gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

quasifilmie · 2012-04-16 19:16:21

Vena wrote:

I know this question doesn't exactly belong here, but I don't know where else to ask and googling this doesn't help.
What does it mean "Gnome 3.4.1 stable tarballs due"? I mean the "tarballs due" part. Does it have something to do with i18n (or more precisely l10n)?

I am pretty sure it means upstream makes the sources available for packagers. At that point, the only bugs that are fixed are that of compilation errors. You can think of it as a final release candidate. It sorts of like how wonder puts firefox sometimes in testing before it's official release.

kjell · 2012-04-16 20:56:03

wavded wrote:

Also, I can't click on any links in the preview pane in the HTML emails... - running evolution 3.4.1-1

I've had that problem since I installed 3.4 ..its random at best, sometimes double clicking works, sometimes nothing, sometimes single click works. It's not only the preview pane, same with an open mail window.

Last edited by kjell (2012-04-16 20:56:30)

wonder · 2012-04-16 21:17:25

kjell wrote:

wavded wrote:
Also, I can't click on any links in the preview pane in the HTML emails... - running evolution 3.4.1-1

I've had that problem since I installed 3.4 ..its random at best, sometimes double clicking works, sometimes nothing, sometimes single click works. It's not only the preview pane, same with an open mail window.

stuff will remained unfixed until somebody reports it upstream. i believe that is a bug in gtkhtml

emmanuelux · 2012-04-17 23:37:22

an other 'old' problem in evolution and calendar alert : when the alert window is displayed, we need to click twice into the window alert to close it, one time to get focus in it I think, and the second time to click to the close button.

Last edited by emmanuelux (2012-04-17 23:38:04)

jackgu1988 · 2012-04-17 23:42:58

emmanuelux wrote:

an other 'old' problem in evolution and calendar alert : when the alert window is displayed, we need to click twice into the window alert to close it, one time to get focus in it I think, and the second time to click to the close button.

I don't think this is arch specific. Please report upstream if not already reported.

Anyone tried 3.4.1? How does it feel?

fredbezies · 2012-04-18 03:26:32

Just wondering : could it be possible in order to fix the mirrored screenshot bug to add until new cogl is released patch from https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673137 ?

It was added to git version on 2 april...

Thanks for your answer.

fredbezies · 2012-04-18 13:52:19

Planning display works in gnome shell 3.4.1. Only remaining weird crashes. So https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673474 (duplicate of https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673610) is now "dead".

Another bug bites the dust

mpnordland · 2012-04-18 17:15:53

Hey, I'm just wondering when 3.4.1 will arrive in [extra], whether it'll be today or tomorrow.

wonder · 2012-04-18 17:19:25

mpnordland wrote:

Hey, I'm just wondering when 3.4.1 will arrive in [extra], whether it'll be today or tomorrow.

in weekend.

flamelab · 2012-04-18 19:10:25

No news for complete 3.4 support for Cinnamon yet, huh ?

ephan · 2012-04-18 19:17:51

wonder wrote:

mpnordland wrote:
Hey, I'm just wondering when 3.4.1 will arrive in [extra], whether it'll be today or tomorrow.
in weekend.

Any ideas when it'll be in stable? Thank you.

wonder · 2012-04-18 19:18:24

ephan wrote:

wonder wrote:
mpnordland wrote:
Hey, I'm just wondering when 3.4.1 will arrive in [extra], whether it'll be today or tomorrow.
in weekend.
Any ideas when it'll be in stable? Thank you.

you just quoted me. the date is in there

ephan · 2012-04-18 19:48:48

wonder wrote:

ephan wrote:
wonder wrote:
in weekend.
Any ideas when it'll be in stable? Thank you.
you just quoted me. the date is in there

Sorry, I thought []'s meaned testing

KanocX · 2012-04-18 21:11:22

wonder wrote:

mpnordland wrote:
Hey, I'm just wondering when 3.4.1 will arrive in [extra], whether it'll be today or tomorrow.
in weekend.

Yes, that sounds awesome Thx wonder

Taylor001 · 2012-04-18 22:42:26

epiphany-3.4.1-1-i686
crashes few seconds after start (SIGILL).

kjell · 2012-04-18 23:46:33

Taylor001 wrote:

epiphany-3.4.1-1-i686
crashes few seconds after start (SIGILL).

No problem here with Epiphany that I've noticed.... you using flash by chance or any other plugins?

Btw, clock panel works. Getting my calendar events...awesome. Now if only contacts gets fixed

Thanks

Last edited by kjell (2012-04-19 08:58:19)

mpnordland · 2012-04-19 02:56:23

OK, now I can end my repeated pacman -Syu 's, I know when

rat4 · 2012-04-19 07:15:54

Please rebuild gnome-system-monitor with systemd support, it requires explicit --enable-systemd when configuring.

Taylor001 · 2012-04-19 09:00:53

kjell wrote:

Taylor001 wrote:
epiphany-3.4.1-1-i686
crashes few seconds after start (SIGILL).
No problem here with Epiphany that I've noticed.... you using flash by chance or any other plugins?

Btw, clock panel works. Getting my calendar events...awesome. Now if only contacts gets fixed
Thanks

Nothing at all.

camp · 2012-04-19 13:00:02

I'm little disappointed. one day ago gnome released 3.4.1 and on arch is still not stable 3.4.0!

wonder · 2012-04-19 13:23:37

camp wrote:

I'm little disappointed. one day ago gnome released 3.4.1 and on arch is still not stable 3.4.0!

I'm very disapointed as well because you don't know how to look.

kjell · 2012-04-19 13:55:23

Unless I missed something, the media extension "breaks" in 3.4.1. It's quite easy to fix, just add 3.4.1 to the array in

~/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/mediaplayer@patapon.info/metadata.json

"shell-version": [
"3.3.5",
"3.3.90",
"3.3.91",
"3.3.92",
"3.4.0",
"3.4.1"
],

...restart shell.

camp · 2012-04-19 22:15:02

wonder wrote:

camp wrote:
I'm little disappointed. one day ago gnome released 3.4.1 and on arch is still not stable 3.4.0!
I'm very disapointed as well because you don't know how to look.

I don't really understand what you mean by how do I look. But when I ask here. I got answer like this: When 3.4.1 is released 3.4.0 become stable. Don't give me wrong but I don't see it in standard Arch repository. You and may be others thinks that I'm just another stupid user because I act like one. But over the years I have been using linux I saw many of distributions and projects that get down because of people like you who just talk and don't doing any income for project itself. Then next time before you answer think twice that you may be talking to person who is twice of your age and have even some experience. When developers say it's gonna be done by some date it should be done! That's how it's use to work!

Last edited by camp (2012-04-19 22:16:36)

wonder · 2012-04-19 22:40:36

Well, you didn't get me right, I didn't said anything about your appearance. I just said about looking for what version of gnome we have in testing.
As I said multiple times, gnome 3.4.x will move in [extra] when 3.4.1 is released. Now that 3.4.1 is released and already in [testing] i will move 3.4.1 in [extra] in weekend.

you just have to understand that real life is more important than packaging. we are not paid to do anything in arch, we are donating our free time for the community.
if you want to have it in the day of the announcement in "standard" repos, then send me a paycheck and it will be done.

Last edited by wonder (2012-04-19 22:41:27)

kjell · 2012-04-19 22:45:42

camp wrote:

wonder wrote:
camp wrote:
I'm little disappointed. one day ago gnome released 3.4.1 and on arch is still not stable 3.4.0!
I'm very disapointed as well because you don't know how to look.
I don't really understand what you mean by how do I look. But when I ask here. I got answer like this: When 3.4.1 is released 3.4.0 become stable. Don't give me wrong but I don't see it in standard Arch repository. You and may be others thinks that I'm just another stupid user because I act like one. But over the years I have been using linux I saw many of distributions and projects that get down because of people like you who just talk and don't doing any income for project itself. Then next time before you answer think twice that you may be talking to person who is twice of your age and have even some experience. When developers say it's gonna be done by some date it should be done! That's how it's use to work!

Why would you want 3.4.0 anyway..its quite buggy.

Arch Linux

#326 2012-04-16 19:16:21

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#327 2012-04-16 20:56:03

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#328 2012-04-16 21:17:25

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#329 2012-04-17 23:37:22

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#330 2012-04-17 23:42:58

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#331 2012-04-18 03:26:32

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#332 2012-04-18 13:52:19

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#333 2012-04-18 17:15:53

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#334 2012-04-18 17:19:25

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#335 2012-04-18 19:10:25

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#336 2012-04-18 19:17:51

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#337 2012-04-18 19:18:24

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#338 2012-04-18 19:48:48

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#339 2012-04-18 21:11:22

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#340 2012-04-18 22:42:26

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#341 2012-04-18 23:46:33

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#342 2012-04-19 02:56:23

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#343 2012-04-19 07:15:54

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#344 2012-04-19 09:00:53

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#345 2012-04-19 13:00:02

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#346 2012-04-19 13:23:37

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#347 2012-04-19 13:55:23

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#348 2012-04-19 22:15:02

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#349 2012-04-19 22:40:36

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

#350 2012-04-19 22:45:42

Re: gnome 3.4beta2 in gnome-unstable

Board footer