[SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

padremayi · 2012-07-06 10:06:26

Need libppl.so.11, gcc 4.6.3 is encountering this error:

cc1plus: error while loading shared libraries: libppl.so.11: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Last edited by padremayi (2012-07-14 21:23:07)

Gcool · 2012-07-06 11:53:59

The latest cc1plus is built against libppl.so.12.

So bottomline, upgrade your system and try again.

padremayi · 2012-07-06 16:28:15

Gcool wrote:

The latest cc1plus is built against libppl.so.12.
So bottomline, upgrade your system and try again.

Thanks for reply.
I'm trying to use old gcc version because 4.7.1 fails on narrowing error.
With 4.7.1 I must use NOWERROR=1 option for skip the errors.

With gcc 4.6.3 I receiving libppl.so.11 error.

Is there a way to solve it?

Last edited by padremayi (2012-07-14 21:32:18)

roxas · 2012-07-06 16:33:16

I don't know if this is an aweful decision but as a temporary measure I copied libppl.so.12 as libppl.so.11 with

 sudo cp /usr/lib/libppl.so.12 /usr/lib/libppl.so.11

I needed that library for sage-math (creating a sandbox to be precise) and it worked just fine.

falconindy · 2012-07-06 16:55:18

roxas wrote:

I don't know if this is an aweful decision

I'll just confirm: yes, it is.

roxas · 2012-07-06 17:13:10

Ahahahah. Well, it bought me the time I needed.
Anymore ideas before the problem catches up?

padremayi · 2012-07-06 17:20:54

roxas wrote:

I don't know if this is an aweful decision but as a temporary measure I copied libppl.so.12 as libppl.so.11 with
 sudo cp /usr/lib/libppl.so.12 /usr/lib/libppl.so.11 
I needed that library for sage-math (creating a sandbox to be precise) and it worked just fine.

-_-

Last edited by padremayi (2012-07-14 21:23:36)

SolarBoyMatt · 2012-07-06 17:39:38

No, don't. As falconindy already said, that's a bad decision.

Creating a copy and renaming it, doesn't seem any better than creating a symlink to the library, which is also a bad idea.

roxas · 2012-07-06 18:08:05

SolarBoyMatt wrote:

Creating a copy and renaming it, doesn't seem any better than creating a symlink to the library, which is also a bad idea.

That was my plan B.

No seriously, why did libppl.so.11 suddenly disappeared? Isn't it because libppl.so.12 took its place as Gcool suggested it?

padremayi · 2012-07-06 19:18:39

here

Last edited by padremayi (2012-07-14 21:34:42)

padremayi · 2012-07-06 22:31:26

here

Last edited by padremayi (2012-07-14 21:24:58)

Allan · 2012-07-06 22:38:27

Solved? .... The correct way is to rebuild the old gcc against the new ppl.

padremayi · 2012-07-07 07:16:07

Allan wrote:

Solved? .... The correct way is to rebuild the old gcc against the new ppl.

here

Last edited by padremayi (2012-07-14 21:25:42)

bangkok_manouel · 2012-07-07 08:12:22

padremayi wrote:

Allan wrote:
Solved? .... The correct way is to rebuild the old gcc against the new ppl.
It seems that nobody is interested on this problem, GCC 4.7 always fails.
For me it's SOLVED

it seems that you have no clue what you are doing. Allan told you how to solve your "problem": fully update your system then rebuild gcc46.

padremayi · 2012-07-07 10:26:26

bangkok_manouel wrote:

padremayi wrote:
Allan wrote:
Solved? .... The correct way is to rebuild the old gcc against the new ppl.
It seems that nobody is interested on this problem, GCC 4.7 always fails.
For me it's SOLVED
it seems that you have no clue what you are doing. Allan told you how to solve your "problem": fully update your system then rebuild gcc46.

I downgraded gcc, gcc-libs and ppl and after that I upgraded again. Is it not enough?

How about rebuild? I'm a newbie and Linux expert always uses max 30 letters for his answer!

EDIT: here

Last edited by padremayi (2012-07-14 21:26:44)

bangkok_manouel · 2012-07-07 10:48:50

you should have your machine fully updated so gcc47 which is linked against ppl 1.0 works properly. to build gcc 4.6.3, you can grab it from AUR https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58748. to build a package, you can check the wiki, look for makepkg to begin with. oh and remove libppl.so.11 from your machine of course.

padremayi · 2012-07-07 12:52:00

bangkok_manouel wrote:

you should have your machine fully updated so gcc47 which is linked against ppl 1.0 works properly. to build gcc 4.6.3, you can grab it from AUR https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58748. to build a package, you can check the wiki, look for makepkg to begin with. oh and remove libppl.so.11 from your machine of course.

Try before writing, not so simple :-)
There's a bug but now it works.

Read here

Last edited by padremayi (2012-07-14 21:35:55)

Arch Linux

#1 2012-07-06 10:06:26

[SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#2 2012-07-06 11:53:59

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#3 2012-07-06 16:28:15

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#4 2012-07-06 16:33:16

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#5 2012-07-06 16:55:18

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#6 2012-07-06 17:13:10

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#7 2012-07-06 17:20:54

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#8 2012-07-06 17:39:38

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#9 2012-07-06 18:08:05

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#10 2012-07-06 19:18:39

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#11 2012-07-06 22:31:26

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#12 2012-07-06 22:38:27

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#13 2012-07-07 07:16:07

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#14 2012-07-07 08:12:22

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#15 2012-07-07 10:26:26

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#16 2012-07-07 10:48:50

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

#17 2012-07-07 12:52:00

Re: [SOLVED] need libppl.so.11

Board footer