Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

Lockheed · 2012-07-15 20:12:08

After a long and strenuous fight, I finally upgraded glibc. However, now I am running into this problem when running yaourt -S

==> Validating source files with md5sums...
    tp_smapi-0.41.tar.gz ... Passed
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    tp_smapi-0.41.tar.gz ... Passed
==> Extracting Sources...
  -> Extracting tp_smapi-0.41.tar.gz with bsdtar
==> Starting build()...
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/modules/3.3.8-1-ARCH/build', needed by `modules'.  Stop.
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build tp_smapi.
==> Restart building tp_smapi ? [y/N]
==> ---------------------------------

Zamboniman · 2012-07-15 20:17:16

Are you running the currently installed kernel?

lifeafter2am · 2012-07-15 20:18:12

At the very least he isn't updated to the newest kernel.

Lone_Wolf · 2012-07-15 20:20:56

latest version 0.41-2 builds fine here with makepkg , did you do a complete pacman -Syu before building ?

This line

make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/modules/3.3.8-1-ARCH/build', needed by `modules'.  Stop.

suggests you haven't done a full update as current kernel version is 3.4.4 .

Lockheed · 2012-07-15 20:30:20

Yes, I did full update, except the kernel. Kernels above 3.3 require nvidia 3xx which breaks resume for me.

jasonwryan · 2012-07-15 20:52:27

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … nsupported

cfr · 2012-07-15 22:42:33

Why not try the LTS kernel?

Lockheed · 2012-07-15 23:00:37

It's too old.

cfr · 2012-07-15 23:45:12

jasonwryan wrote:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … nsupported

Lockheed · 2012-07-16 08:59:03

cfr wrote:

jasonwryan wrote:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … nsupported

You mean unsupported, or forbidden? If you don't want to help, then just don't answer in this thread.

jasonwryan · 2012-07-16 09:09:06

Lockheed wrote:

cfr wrote:
jasonwryan wrote:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … nsupported
You mean unsupported, or forbidden? If you don't want to help, then just don't answer in this thread.

Unsupported as in not suported -- in this thread or any other.

Gusar · 2012-07-16 09:16:00

Lockheed wrote:

Kernels above 3.3 require nvidia 3xx

Why would the kernel care about the nvidia driver? It's the other way around, the nvidia driver needs to take care that it support a specific kernel. And all current nvidia drivers (295xx long-lived branch, 302xx stable, 304xx beta, 173xx legacy) support all released kernels.

Lockheed · 2012-07-16 09:20:23

I was not able to install 2xx drivers on 3.4 kernels. Maybe I need to compile them myself.
But also 3.4 kernels brake automounting of USB devices.

tomk · 2012-07-16 09:31:29

So fundamentally your issue has nothing to with AUR install issues, and everything to do with alleged kernel issues. Invstigate your automount and nvidia issues - I can assure you that automount is working fine for me with 3.4.4., and although I don't use nvidia myself, I think there would be quite a lot of noise around here if the arch nvidia package did not work with the arch kernel package.

Lockheed · 2012-07-16 09:46:28

tomk wrote:

So fundamentally your issue has nothing to with AUR install issues, and everything to do with alleged kernel issues. Invstigate your automount and nvidia issues - I can assure you that automount is working fine for me with 3.4.4., and although I don't use nvidia myself, I think there would be quite a lot of noise around here if the arch nvidia package did not work with the arch kernel package.

My current issue IS about installing a package from AUR. Kernel issues is another matter. And I did investigate it to no avail, so the only thing i could do is downgrade the kernel.

Here's the nvidia in more detail: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 9#p1121839

tomk · 2012-07-16 10:10:41

"Maybe it is connected to newest nvidia driver?" ... you have an odd definition of the phrase "in more detail".

Anyway, good luck, clearly you're not prepared to put in any serious effort here.

Roken · 2012-07-16 11:26:40

If you still have the kernel in the pacman cache (/var/cache/pacman/pkg) couldn't you reinstall the current kernel from there and see if it fixes the AUR issue?

Lockheed · 2012-07-16 13:59:21

I just installed newest linux-pf kernel, and the error persists. At least USB automounting is gone, and when I installed nvidia drivers 295 manually, the suspend problem is gone as well.

tomk · 2012-07-16 15:48:00

The exact same error? "/blah/blah/3.3.8-1-ARCH/blah"? that means you didn't reboot into the new kernel.

OTOH, if it's the same error except with the pf kernel version, make sure you installed the headers.

davethepresident · 2012-07-16 17:45:12

I have similar problem to:
I'm the owner of the Asus Aspire One netbook with pretty rubbish graphic chip onboard - Intel gma500. I know there are open source driver in the kernel works out of the box, but preformance is far from ideal.
An option can be emgd driver but xorg 1.10 and kernel 3.3 are required for proper work, so during last glibc update i had to update xorg and kernel for the latest version and obviously after that I got unworked Xorg.
Then I downgraded xorg and kernel, but I couldnt install emgd driver anymore, because symlink "build" in /etc/lib/modules/3.3.8-1-ARCH was broken.
So I deleted symlink "build" in /etc/lib/modules/3.3.8-1-ARCH and manualy recreated it to the /usr/src/3.3.8-1-ARCH.
After that emgd driver was installed prefectly and now I have perfectly working xorg again.
I know this is not the rightest solution, but it helped me and may be it will be usefull for others.

Arch Linux

#1 2012-07-15 20:12:08

Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#2 2012-07-15 20:17:16

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#3 2012-07-15 20:18:12

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#4 2012-07-15 20:20:56

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#5 2012-07-15 20:30:20

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#6 2012-07-15 20:52:27

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#7 2012-07-15 22:42:33

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#8 2012-07-15 23:00:37

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#9 2012-07-15 23:45:12

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#10 2012-07-16 08:59:03

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#11 2012-07-16 09:09:06

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#12 2012-07-16 09:16:00

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#13 2012-07-16 09:20:23

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#14 2012-07-16 09:31:29

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#15 2012-07-16 09:46:28

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#16 2012-07-16 10:10:41

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#17 2012-07-16 11:26:40

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#18 2012-07-16 13:59:21

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#19 2012-07-16 15:48:00

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

#20 2012-07-16 17:45:12

Re: Problem with AUR package installation after glibc upgrade

Board footer