You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2012-08-23 07:11:09
- ebal
- Member
- From: Athens, Greece
- Registered: 2009-05-26
- Posts: 224
- Website
systemd new section
How about creating a new section for systemd ?
https://balaskas.gr
Linux System Engineer - Registered Linux User #420129
Offline
#2 2012-08-23 07:16:37
- litemotiv
- Forum Fellow
- Registered: 2008-08-01
- Posts: 5,026
Re: systemd new section
You mean to replace the sysvinit BSD-style section? 
Last edited by litemotiv (2012-08-23 07:19:08)
ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ
Offline
#3 2012-08-23 08:24:50
- ngoonee
- Forum Fellow
- From: Between Thailand and Singapore
- Registered: 2009-03-17
- Posts: 7,358
Re: systemd new section
Assuming you're talking about the forums - not happening. There's not that many (valid) threads about systemd anyway, and the questions are already dying down (I recall the systemd conversation being MUCH more active months ago).
Its okay to suggest such things, but some justification would be good, else you're just wasting everyone's time.
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
Pages: 1