unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

czubek · 2012-08-29 21:56:18

CPU Info

cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 15
model		: 36
model name	: AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology ML-32
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 800.000
cache size	: 512 KB
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 1
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow up rep_good nopl pni lahf_lm
bogomips	: 1595.71
TLB size	: 1024 4K pages
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp tm stc

Some of the output I understood and some I did not. So I went and installed it and it seems to be working.

 ~]$ uname -a
Linux HPDV5K 3.5.3-2-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Aug 27 16:12:22 EDT 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux

SanskritFritz · 2012-08-31 08:49:52

graysky, does the new systemd replacing libsystemd and systemd-tools have any effect on your kernel? IOW, should we wait with the Syu until you upgrade your kernel?

Last edited by SanskritFritz (2012-08-31 08:50:27)

graysky · 2012-08-31 08:57:52

SanskritFritz wrote:

graysky, does the new systemd replacing libsystemd and systemd-tools have any effect on your kernel? IOW, should we wait with the Syu until you upgrade your kernel?

I don't think so; my boxes are running linux-ck flavors just fine and are up-to-date. Is there a reason to think otherwise... have I missed something?

Last edited by graysky (2012-08-31 09:02:35)

SanskritFritz · 2012-08-31 14:20:53

graysky wrote:

my boxes are running linux-ck flavors just fine and are up-to-date. Is there a reason to think otherwise... have I missed something?

Probably not, linux-lts got upgraded the same time with systemd (coincidence as it turned out), it just caught my eyes. Better ask I thought to myself, so I won't be sorry later
Thanks graysky.

MrCode · 2012-08-31 18:54:26

I'm pretty sure the only thing that's happened with systemd replacing libsystemd/systemd-tools is a package merge; there's no change in functionality, just a (more or less) forced installation of the rest of systemd along with udev, etc.

SiD · 2012-09-02 19:21:35

I switched to Systemd and on some bootups Systemd hangs at starting dkms.service for a few seconds and then I get the login prompt on tty
but it should start lxdm. Sometime it wokrs like it should (Systemd doesn't hang and lxdm starts).

With the arch stock kernel this doesn't happen at all.

graysky · 2012-09-02 19:48:14

Running virtualbox? The dkms service will rebuild your vbox modules which takes some time. The ARCH packages provide the prebuilt modules.

SiD · 2012-09-02 19:56:04

Yes virtualbox-bin from AUR it has dkms as dependency

I thought it only builds the modules if a new virtualbox or kernel version is installed, and not at every boot.
And why does the lxdm service / X not start if the "problem" occurs?

With the stock kernel it always works.

EDIT
aren't the prebuild modules from the ARCH packages for the stock kernel only?

Last edited by SiD (2012-09-02 19:58:07)

SiD · 2012-09-02 20:29:56

ok, dkms service is not the Problem, I deactivated it but the problem still occurs?
How could I figure out what's the problem?

litemotiv · 2012-09-02 22:10:38

SiD wrote:

ok, dkms service is not the Problem, I deactivated it but the problem still occurs?
How could I figure out what's the problem?

It doesn't sound like a ck-specific bug, it's probably best to open a dedicated thread for it.

SiD · 2012-09-03 09:22:43

litemotiv wrote:

SiD wrote:
ok, dkms service is not the Problem, I deactivated it but the problem still occurs?
How could I figure out what's the problem?
It doesn't sound like a ck-specific bug, it's probably best to open a dedicated thread for it.

Hm, ok, but with the arch stock kernel it nerver occuerd so far.

litemotiv · 2012-09-03 10:12:32

SiD wrote:

litemotiv wrote:
SiD wrote:
ok, dkms service is not the Problem, I deactivated it but the problem still occurs?
How could I figure out what's the problem?
It doesn't sound like a ck-specific bug, it's probably best to open a dedicated thread for it.
Hm, ok, but with the arch stock kernel it nerver occuerd so far.

Yes i understand, but generally there is very little on the kernel-level that should be of influence in this context. At least a dedicated thread will allow more elaborate investigation without going too much offtopic in this thread.

Last edited by litemotiv (2012-09-03 10:12:50)

graysky · 2012-09-03 11:19:04

litemotiv wrote:

Yes i understand, but generally there is very little on the kernel-level that should be of influence in this context. At least a dedicated thread will allow more elaborate investigation without going too much offtopic in this thread.

Plus, this thread is intended for repo-related issues

ilkyest · 2012-09-04 21:06:53

Graysky., during a -Syyu I receive the message

:: vhba-module-ck: requires linux-ck<=3.5

graysky · 2012-09-04 23:30:40

ilkyest wrote:

Graysky., during a -Syyu I receive the message
:: vhba-module-ck: requires linux-ck<=3.5

You need to flag that package out of date in the aur.

ilkyest · 2012-09-05 01:52:15

how do I do this?

karol · 2012-09-05 01:57:42

ilkyest wrote:

how do I do this?

1. Register an account and log in.
2. Find the package - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34770.
3. Click the 'Flag Out-of date' button.

FYI, it has already been flagged over a week ago.

Last edited by karol (2012-09-05 01:59:06)

ilkyest · 2012-09-05 02:21:46

what means... just wait do do a update?
=========================
off: I can't log in aur... if I use https the browser stays loading, and nothing happens, until appears too much time to answer. Not in firefox, nor chromium

Last edited by ilkyest (2012-09-05 02:27:47)

karol · 2012-09-05 02:26:49

ilkyest wrote:

what means... just wait do do a update?

Or edit the PKGBUILD yourself.

ilkyest · 2012-09-05 02:30:31

Well I'll wait....

I'm trying solve my aur's problems, that I can't go to the https page....
=========
solved, with

ip link set eth0 mtu 1500

from here
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28259
=========

Let's wait, so, to new package

Last edited by ilkyest (2012-09-05 02:35:56)

ummakynes · 2012-09-23 05:50:52

I would like to request a 64bit package for P4. I have a nocona that is 64bit capable.

graysky · 2012-09-23 16:16:29

ummakynes wrote:

I would like to request a 64bit package for P4. I have a nocona that is 64bit capable.

Lemme see what I can do for you...

graysky · 2012-09-23 16:36:15

ummakynes wrote:

I would like to request a 64bit package for P4. I have a nocona that is 64bit capable.

OK... you now have all packages in the p4 flavor for x86_64. Please let me know if problems.
You may install via the 'ck-p4' group or one-by-one, i.e.

$ sudo pacman -Syy && sudo pacman -S ck-p4

$ ssh repo-ck
...
$ ls /data/repo/x86_64 | grep p4
broadcom-wl-ck-p4-5.100.82.112-20-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
broadcom-wl-ck-p4-5.100.82.112-20-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig
linux-ck-p4-3.5.4-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
linux-ck-p4-3.5.4-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig
linux-ck-p4-headers-3.5.4-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
linux-ck-p4-headers-3.5.4-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig
nvidia-ck-p4-304.43-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
nvidia-ck-p4-304.43-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig

Jristz · 2012-09-23 23:45:28

I have an Atom, but I noticed that the corex work too
whatis the real difference in building, or is only a "inperseptible"???

graysky · 2012-09-23 23:54:30

Jristz wrote:

I have an Atom, but I noticed that the corex work too
whatis the real difference in building, or is only a "inperseptible"???

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Repo-ck

CPU-specific optimization are invoked at compilation by selecting the corresponding option under Processor type and features>Processor family or by setting-up the .config file accordingly. These changes setup make specific gcc options including the $CFLAGS. For more, see the following files:
...

Arch Linux

#951 2012-08-29 21:56:18

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#952 2012-08-31 08:49:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#953 2012-08-31 08:57:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#954 2012-08-31 14:20:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#955 2012-08-31 18:54:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#956 2012-09-02 19:21:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#957 2012-09-02 19:48:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#958 2012-09-02 19:56:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#959 2012-09-02 20:29:56

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#960 2012-09-02 22:10:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#961 2012-09-03 09:22:43

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#962 2012-09-03 10:12:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#963 2012-09-03 11:19:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#964 2012-09-04 21:06:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#965 2012-09-04 23:30:40

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#966 2012-09-05 01:52:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#967 2012-09-05 01:57:42

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#968 2012-09-05 02:21:46

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#969 2012-09-05 02:26:49

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#970 2012-09-05 02:30:31

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#971 2012-09-23 05:50:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#972 2012-09-23 16:16:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#973 2012-09-23 16:36:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#974 2012-09-23 23:45:28

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#975 2012-09-23 23:54:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer