You are not logged in.

#1 2004-01-03 05:00:01

dp
Member
From: Zürich, Switzerland
Registered: 2003-05-27
Posts: 3,378
Website

gcc: --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc

--enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc

-> just added f77

... and now i would suggest that the official gcc has fortran included, please  (i do not want to have my own gcc-f77-patched the whole time ... and fortran is something very usefull wink so please maintainers, gods, include it)


The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.

Offline

#2 2004-01-10 19:19:43

sarah31
Member
From: Middle of Canada
Registered: 2002-08-20
Posts: 2,975
Website

Re: gcc: --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc

yes i agree it is time to enable more language support in gcc


AKA uknowme

I am not your friend

Offline

#3 2004-01-11 13:54:30

dp
Member
From: Zürich, Switzerland
Registered: 2003-05-27
Posts: 3,378
Website

Re: gcc: --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc

sarah31 wrote:

yes i agree it is time to enable more language support in gcc

thanx for this +itive feedback :-) ... i tried the intel fortran compiler (thanx andy), but the target is to use gcc and not 80MB of external compiler for fortran, that exists "native" in gcc


The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.

Offline

#4 2004-01-11 22:15:17

andy
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2002-10-11
Posts: 374

Re: gcc: --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc

You're welcome :-) (and there is a new release waiting ... and another 80Megs .... ;-) ... )

Of course, the Intel compiler is Fortran95, while g77 is Fortran77 .... but I still support g77 in gcc

Offline

#5 2004-01-12 09:34:49

dp
Member
From: Zürich, Switzerland
Registered: 2003-05-27
Posts: 3,378
Website

Re: gcc: --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc

andy wrote:

You're welcome :-) (and there is a new release waiting ... and another   80Megs .... ;-) ... )

hilfe! ... for the one release it took me 2 nights to download :::! (the server was so slow --- my site accepts to 33kb/s down but this was about 1-2kb/s transfer speed)

can someone bring arguments up why not including it in gcc?


The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB