Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

fouinix · 2005-10-13 08:38:36

It is necessary that you continuous to provide the packages of e17, users update e17 with your repositary.
I am simply disappointed that we do not have to speak together. The Arch community is small, we can easily speak.
2 repositary will not simplify the things, it's this which obstructs me. Continue what you do, it's good
Excuse me

shadowhand · 2005-10-13 22:46:46

Repo update:

- Removed all E17 packages (I'm going to Xfce)

fouinix: you might find the following script useful if you use versionpkg (from the AUR). I used it to build my E17 packages with a single command. I'm sure you can figure out what all the options are.

#!/bin/bash

repopkgdir=/mnt/station/arch_pkg/archpkg/shadowhand
repoabsdir=/mnt/station/arch_pkg/archpkg/pkgbuild

export _BEGINDIR=`pwd`

if [ -e builtlog ] ; then
  rm builtlog
fi
touch builtlog

for dir in `ls`; do
    ## Take me back to the top level
    cd $_BEGINDIR

    if [ -d "$dir" ]; then
        cd $dir
        
        BUILD_DATE=`date +%Y%m%d`
        CURRENT_PKG=`pwd | xargs basename`
        
        echo -n "Building $CURRENT_PKG, version $BUILD_DATE... "
        
        versionpkg >/dev/null 2>&1
        
        cp /home/packages/$CURRENT_PKG-$BUILD_DATE* $repopkgdir >/dev/null 2>&1
        if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
          cp PKGBUILD $repoabsdir/$CURRENT_PKG >/dev/null 2>&1
          echo "$CURRENT_PKG was built on $BUILD_DATE" >> $_BEGINDIR/builtlog
          echo "done."
        else
          echo "Build of $CURRENT_PKG failed on $BUILD_DATE" >> $_BEGINDIR/builtlog
          echo "failed."
        fi
          
    else
        /bin/true
    fi
    
done

/bin/grep -v builtlog failed >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -ne 1 ] ; then
    echo -n "Some packages failed to build. "
else
    echo -n "All packages built sucsessfully! "
fi

echo "Check builtlog for details."

exit 0

nightfrost · 2005-10-13 23:35:11

- Removed all E17 packages (I'm going to Xfce)

Too bad. Have you removed the pkgbuilds as well? If you don't mind, I'd like to use them to build my own packages (at least when I have the time).

shadowhand · 2005-10-14 03:04:08

nightfrost wrote:

- Removed all E17 packages (I'm going to Xfce)
Too bad. Have you removed the pkgbuilds as well? If you don't mind, I'd like to use them to build my own packages (at least when I have the time).

All E17 PKGBUILDS, with my build-e17.sh script:
http://archpkg.wgilk.com/pkgbuild/sh_e17-cvs.tar.gz

fouinix · 2005-10-14 09:40:53

It's very bad for the users of your repo
I did not wish that !!!

nightfrost · 2005-10-14 10:39:39

shadowhand wrote:

nightfrost wrote:
- Removed all E17 packages (I'm going to Xfce)
Too bad. Have you removed the pkgbuilds as well? If you don't mind, I'd like to use them to build my own packages (at least when I have the time).
All E17 PKGBUILDS, with my build-e17.sh script:
http://archpkg.wgilk.com/pkgbuild/sh_e17-cvs.tar.gz

Thanks.

But honestly; are you doing this because of fouinix's remarks? Cause if you are, he really really doesn't seem to have meant it in the vein it sounded like when he made his first comment...

On the other hand, if you did it just because you don't use e17 anymore, then that's alright of course.

Blind · 2005-10-14 13:54:24

...I am looking forward to your XFCE bleeding edge package, though

Anyhow, I think people should lighten up a bit. After all, we all do this for the fun of it.

Cheers,
Blind

dtw · 2005-10-14 14:05:40

Blind wrote:

I think people should lighten up a bit. After all, we all do this for the fun of it.

Having various versions in various repos does confuse things badly - if founix is doing the same as Shadowhand then one should keep doing it. If Shadowhand swicthes to XFCE bleeding edge builds (which is a "free" market" then surely that is better for everyone?! So good on Shadowhand for stepping down

zba78 · 2005-10-14 15:45:08

Either way I think you both should be applauded for the great work you've done for the community

Blind · 2005-10-14 19:23:00

zba78 wrote:

Either way I think you both should be applauded for the great work you've done for the community

Indeed!

@dibble:
I agree with you.

Nevertheless: I always thought that the AUR is also there to encourage collaboration. Obviously both had their reasons not to put their PKBUILDS into AUR (something which I don't really understand). So each can do whatever they want.
I guess all that I want to say is: making your own package (and letting others know about it), even though it is in the repo of somebody else, IMHO is not something to get all fussy about. It would be a little different, if the package had been in one of the official repos or AUR.

If you add whoevers repo to your pacman conf file, you better know what you are doing - and be sure, that they don't conflict with each other.
Personally, I get the PKGBUILD and build the things on my own. I enjoyed doing this with a couple of yours

I am having a beer now

Cheers,
Blind

sabrewolf · 2005-10-14 20:44:34

problems with beagle(stupid mono):

/usr/bin/beagled: line 105: exec: mono: not found

mono is installed(with pacman)

fouinix · 2005-10-14 21:19:33

I agree with dibblethewrecker

I think that e17 needs a serious repo (which does not change every 2 months) and regularly updated.
I made a remark to shadowhand, but it was not to make evil and it was only for the good of the Arch community and e17 users.

However, I am not a coder, I have a family with 2 childrens and a house which I have just bought and which I must renovate. I am not certain to be able to update every 2 or 3 days the e17 packages and I would not like to injure the users of E17 because I pushed shadowhand to stop his e17 repo.

I have only e17 on my repo, therefore shadowhand, if you really wish to maintain seriously the e17 packages, I think that it would be more reasonable to close my repo or to announce in the newsletter that the official e17-cvs repo is maintained by shadowhand.

(Excuse me for my bad english, i hope that you have understand my thoughts)

shadowhand · 2005-10-14 22:38:34

sabrewolf wrote:

problems with beagle(stupid mono):
/usr/bin/beagled: line 105: exec: mono: not found
mono is installed(with pacman)

Log out and back in, or

source /etc/profile.d/* && source ~/.bashrc

That should fix it.

@fouinix: I have no desire to continue building E17 at the moment. I had been thinking about using something else for a while, and your comments just made it happen. If I decide to change my mind at some point, I will let you know.

sabrewolf · 2005-10-15 00:18:58

shadowhand wrote:

sabrewolf wrote:
problems with beagle(stupid mono):
/usr/bin/beagled: line 105: exec: mono: not found
mono is installed(with pacman)
Log out and back in, or
source /etc/profile.d/* && source ~/.bashrc
That should fix it.
@fouinix: I have no desire to continue building E17 at the moment. I had been thinking about using something else for a while, and your comments just made it happen. If I decide to change my mind at some point, I will let you know.

thankz, i try that.

Blind · 2005-10-15 03:34:43

All is good then.
Cheers,
Blind

nightfrost · 2005-10-15 12:40:26

Shadowhand, if it's alright, I'd like to ask something about your PKGBUILDs. I'm trying to use some of them and I'm having a problem with entrance, particularly. The source array lists three files; "entrance.rc.d", "arch_entrance.sh" and "entrance.pam.d", but none of them are present. Do you have these files somewhere for download? or should I just change the PKGBUILD? Thanks in advance.

TomE · 2005-10-15 12:55:21

nightfrost wrote:

Shadowhand, if it's alright, I'd like to ask something about your PKGBUILDs. I'm trying to use some of them and I'm having a problem with entrance, particularly. The source array lists three files; "entrance.rc.d", "arch_entrance.sh" and "entrance.pam.d", but none of them are present. Do you have these files somewhere for download? or should I just change the PKGBUILD? Thanks in advance.

if you have Shadowhands pkg install try:
slocate file name

nightfrost · 2005-10-15 13:09:30

thanks. But it seems like one of the files, arch_entrance.sh, is supposed to be run. So it's nowhere to be found on the system.

shadowhand · 2005-10-15 18:24:56

nightfrost wrote:

Shadowhand, if it's alright, I'd like to ask something about your PKGBUILDs. I'm trying to use some of them and I'm having a problem with entrance, particularly. The source array lists three files; "entrance.rc.d", "arch_entrance.sh" and "entrance.pam.d", but none of them are present. Do you have these files somewhere for download? or should I just change the PKGBUILD? Thanks in advance.

Sorry about that. Entrance was something that I never got fully working the way I wanted, but feel free to keep playing with it. I guess I never copied those files because it never worked right... Here's what you need: http://archpkg.wgilk.com/pkgbuild/entrance.tar.gz .

shadowhand · 2005-10-16 01:38:35

Repo updated.

+ Added xfce-svn group:
    exo-svn gtk-xfce-engine-svn libxfce4mcs-svn libxfcegui4-svn thunar-svn 
    xfburn-svn xfcalendar-svn xfce-mcs-manager-svn xfce-mcs-plugins-svn 
    xfce-utils-svn xfce4-appfinder-svn xfce4-icon-theme-svn 
    xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-svn xfce4-panel-svn xfce4-session-svn 
    xfce4-terminal-svn xfdesktop-svn xfmedia-svn xfprint-svn xfwm4-svn 
    xfwm4-themes-svn

Blind · 2005-10-16 04:14:43

Hi Shadowhand,

I dare make a couple remarks ...
- thunar needs fam
- thunar crashes (when clicking on a text file) because:
Gtk-WARNING **: Could not find the icon 'gnome-settings-default-applications'. The 'hicolor' theme
was not found either, perhaps you need to install it.
You can get a copy from:
http://icon-theme.freedesktop.org/releases
aborting...
Aborted
- xfprint conflicts with xfce-panel-svn? That renders the xfce-svn group install problematic
- xfmedia throws this error:
xfmedia: error while loading shared libraries: libtag_c.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

But other than that: Great work!!!!
Love it already (althoug it seems to start slower than the 4.2.2 version)

Greetings,
Blind

nightfrost · 2005-10-16 11:14:23

shadowhand wrote:

Sorry about that. Entrance was something that I never got fully working the way I wanted, but feel free to keep playing with it. I guess I never copied those files because it never worked right... Here's what you need: http://archpkg.wgilk.com/pkgbuild/entrance.tar.gz .

Thanks alot. I'll play around with this to see what I can do..

Blind · 2005-10-17 03:18:13

Sorry to bother again

checking package integrity...
error: archive gtk-xfce-engine-svn-15930-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive libxfce4mcs-svn-17691-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive libxfcegui4-svn-18279-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfburn-svn-18206-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfcalendar-svn-18298-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce-mcs-manager-svn-18287-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce-mcs-plugins-svn-18296-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce-utils-svn-18275-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce4-appfinder-svn-18300-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce4-icon-theme-svn-18289-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-svn-18301-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce4-panel-svn-18299-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce4-session-svn-18237-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfce4-terminal-svn-14417-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfdesktop-svn-18296-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfprint-svn-18292-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfwm4-svn-18296-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
error: archive xfwm4-themes-svn-14367-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted

I saw that you updated a great deal. Thank you very much for this.
Blind

shadowhand · 2005-10-17 05:00:38

Yeah, I fixed lots of things in various packages, but some of the versions are the same, so remove all those packages from your cache (/var/pacman/pkg/cache) and try again.

Sorry for forgetting to change the revision number...

Blind · 2005-10-17 16:24:15

Hey Shadowhand,
I did that, and I also removed your repository from /var/lib/pacman/ to completely renew the entries - still the same errors. It seems as if the md5sums dont fit, or something - I am not sure. Maybe I will just get your PKGBUILDs and try building myself.
Cheers,
Blind

Update: just checked:
Its not the md5sums!
What the heck did I do?

Update2:
It IS the md5sums (doh, of course I checked a file that was _not listed as corrupted ):
[root@chucks pkg]# md5sum xfce4-terminal-svn-14417-1.pkg.tar.gz
b27343f53ca9a346ffa5c70b7bbaa3dd xfce4-terminal-svn-14417-1.pkg.tar.gz
[root@chucks pkg]# cat /var/lib/pacman/shadowhand/xfce4-terminal-svn-14417-1/desc
blah blah

%MD5SUM%
f5e62cb9d3bd30d1642b0b08af050d2f

blah

Arch Linux

#76 2005-10-13 08:38:36

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#77 2005-10-13 22:46:46

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#78 2005-10-13 23:35:11

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#79 2005-10-14 03:04:08

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#80 2005-10-14 09:40:53

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#81 2005-10-14 10:39:39

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#82 2005-10-14 13:54:24

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#83 2005-10-14 14:05:40

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#84 2005-10-14 15:45:08

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#85 2005-10-14 19:23:00

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#86 2005-10-14 20:44:34

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#87 2005-10-14 21:19:33

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#88 2005-10-14 22:38:34

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#89 2005-10-15 00:18:58

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#90 2005-10-15 03:34:43

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#91 2005-10-15 12:40:26

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#92 2005-10-15 12:55:21

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#93 2005-10-15 13:09:30

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#94 2005-10-15 18:24:56

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#95 2005-10-16 01:38:35

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#96 2005-10-16 04:14:43

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#97 2005-10-16 11:14:23

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#98 2005-10-17 03:18:13

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#99 2005-10-17 05:00:38

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

#100 2005-10-17 16:24:15

Re: Shadowhand's Devel Repo (Firefox, Gaim, Xfce, etc)

Board footer