You are not logged in.
patch acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.bz2 dont works correctly,
...
patching file arch/ia64/Kconfig
Hunk #3 FAILED at 353.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED
...
patching file drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 986 (offset -33 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1362 (offset -33 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1484 (offset -33 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 2062.
Offline
A bit of detail on what you're trying to achieve would be helpful. Are you aware that the current kernel26 package already includes that acpi patch?
Offline
i install the kernel by myself (custom kernel)
from here : http://archlinux.org/packages.php?id=4198
downloading and uncompressing linux-2.6.13.tar.bz2
patching it with the listened patches
compiling and installing it.
but the acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.bz2 patch dont works correctly
Offline
Have you applied the 2.6.13.4 patch before attempting the acpi patch?
Offline
yeah like listened
Offline
you need the acpi-fixup.patch else it will not work
Offline
this is not the first time i install the kernel that way, it was working corectly many times bevore, now the "kernel26 2.6.13.4-3" package is broken and need to be fixed.
>you need the acpi-fixup.patch else it will not work
if so, then it need to be include in the package like the other patches, and without a url this info is quite useless
Offline
now the "kernel26 2.6.13.4-3" package is broken and need to be fixed.
No, the package is working fine, and many Archers have it installed and in use. You are not using the package - you are building your own kernel using the same sources.
If you use ABS, you will see that tpowa's answer isn't as useless as you think.
Offline
yeah i install it from EXACT the same sources like listened in the package
and it dont works, patch report Hunks errors, sounds like broken to me.
Maybe the maker of the package dont have checked the patch output as he build it.
Offline
tpowa has pointed you towards the answer. As you seem to have ignored my previous suggestion regarding ABS, and as you haven't been around here long, I'll give you one more pointer - go here, and click on "View CVS Entries".
Offline
acpi-fixup.patch should be included in the kernel sources array of the PKGBUILD
So, you are both right - as tomk says the info you need is thereif you know where to look for it and it is not "broken" but the PKGBUILD is "wrong" as it doesn't include all the sources used to fix it - I would submit a bug report - but I think tpowa will see this thread ok
Offline
the kernel packages is alright, if someone does decide not to look at the cvs or just simple, use abs to grab the files, then i can't help much.
(this was just to state the the PKGBUILD is alright)
greetings
tpowa
Offline
well until now i have only use the ABS patches like listened and it was working.
Ok i have take a look at the CSV entries and see the patches.
How i need applied then, ABS/CSV and what order ?
1. uncompressing linux-2.6.13.tar.bz2
2. patch xyz ?
3... ?
Offline
For the patch ordering, check out the official PKGBUILD.
Offline
ok, got it, thx
Offline
acpi-fixup.patch should be included in the kernel sources array of the PKGBUILD
So, you are both right - as tomk says the info you need is thereif you know where to look for it and it is not "broken" but the PKGBUILD is "wrong" as it doesn't include all the sources used to fix it - I would submit a bug report - but I think tpowa will see this thread ok
Eh? Ah. Sorry tpowa. Why are the local sources not listed in the sources section on the pkg page?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages.php?id=4197
I just assumed that because they weren't there they were not listed in the PKGBUILD. Does the AUR and "official" interface work differently in this respect?
Offline