You are not logged in.
Hello,
I got much problem with flashplugin, its never working (piece of crap) i'm looking for some application to watch movies on youtube. You have any ideas for that ?
Offline
Offline
What problems?
Have you tried pepper instead of flashplugin?
Offline
Can you recommend something?
What problems?
Have you tried pepper instead of flashplugin?
no i have not. problem is with twin view and fullscreen on firefox. I was trying to edit hex, trying around 100 plugins and not working.
Last edited by McQueenNewbie (2013-06-22 11:34:58)
Offline
Hard to say without knowing what you want/run.
You can run youtube videos using gnash from [community]
For some videos you can view in html5 via the youtube html5 trial link
If you'd rather watch on your own application then you can use minitube or smplayer. youtube-dl to download and watch later. Personally I use smplayer with smtube to find youtube videos
edit: Don't know of many gtk versions, as I've ran KDE for years
Last edited by SS4 (2013-06-22 11:40:26)
Rauchen verboten
Offline
Well i wanna use some program to watching movies on youtube (not by firefox) i spent 2 days to trying repair my flashplugit but it didnt help.
I got 2 monitors, i wanna watch fullscreen on one and work on 2nd one but when i make full screen and go to my 2nd monitor fullscreen is closed.
(i'm very apologise for my english i know it sux hard but i'm doing my best).
Offline
There are many different ways, my preference is to grab the URL of the YT video and then play it with mpv. A typical occasion of doing this would involve seeing what formats are available with quvi - so for me I'd be doing something like;
$ quvi --query-format <youtube-url-foo>
fmt05_240p|fmt17_144p|fmt18_360p|fmt22_720p|fmt34_360p|fmt35_480p|fmt36_240p|fmt43_360p|fmt44_480p|fmt45_720p : <youtube-url-foo>
$ mpv --quvi-format=fmt22_720p <youtube-url-foo> >/dev/null &
Everyone will have their own preferred methods to watch/stream/dump YT videos et al, I find this the most clutter free.
Offline
I dont think youtube needs flash I have no flash or substitute and I can watch youtube in my browser think it has something to do with html5. that said I like youtube-viewer(no ads, comercials) which is a cli program that shows different views like todays top videos etc... and uses mplayer to watch.
--------------------------------------
alcoves wonder creates the wonder unto the ages; never lose that.
Offline
At this point, I need to bring up Youtube's Terms of Service and would like to bring your attention to paragraph 4C. As moderator, I may be obliged to limit the discussion on this thread as the intent is to circumvent that TOS paragraph. Can we wrap it up please?
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
The shortest way to ruin a country is to give power to demagogues.— Dionysius of Halicarnassus
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
Yikes. While I advocate for FOSS, I am also a strong supporter of any content author's rights to protect their content in any way they see fit. But I find that link disturbing. Not the content/restrictions of it - but the fact that (they claim that) anyone who simply views their website is subject to that agreement.
I am subject to a publishers restrictions when I buy one of their products or enter into any form of contract with them. I am not bound by a publishers rules though when I simply walk by their offices!
(EDIT: this is OT, and not relevant to the discussion at hand, as downloading/copying something off of someone's site certainly should make you subject to their restrictions: you are copying their content. I'm just disturbed that they think they can impose rules on people for simply viewing their website.)
*off to blacklist youtube from all of my browsers*
Last edited by Trilby (2013-06-22 14:19:20)
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
Yikes. While I advocate for FOSS, I am also a strong supporter of any content author's rights to protect their content in any way they see fit.
And how. My philosophy is a strange mix of hacker influenced "Data and programs are meant to be free" tempered with the legal realities surrounding most of the projects I have been involved with throughout my professional career. As moderator here, I have to balance the hacker ethic versus drawing undesired attention to Arch Linux from entities that may feel the need to protect their interests. It can be a PITA.
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
The shortest way to ruin a country is to give power to demagogues.— Dionysius of Halicarnassus
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
@ewaller - This is a sticky issue seeing how [community] contains software that can violate paragraph 4C, (youtube-dl for example).
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
@ewaller - This is a sticky issue seeing how [community] contains software that can violate paragraph 4C, (youtube-dl for example).
That is not my department. (ewaller sticks his head back into the sand)
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
The shortest way to ruin a country is to give power to demagogues.— Dionysius of Halicarnassus
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
I an extremist on both ends: I *prefer* open source licensing practices, but I will defend even the most puritanical license. However, just because a company claims certain rights doesn't mean they ever had the authority to do so.
I have a website - not that it gets much traffic yet - but if I were to bury a terms of service document somewhere on my website that said in clear terms that anyone who visited my website was obligated to forget everything they had seen or send me $100 ... well, it's clearly an absurd claim. There is no legal basis to make such claims. I can place restrictions on how someone uses content they download from my site (provided I wrote it in the first place) but I cannot dictate someones behavior simply because they viewed my site.
I support youtube's right to restrict use of their content in any way they see fit (which is why I'll now avoid their site entirely). But to say I am subject to their rules simply because I typed their url in my browser - that's absurd. I'm subject to their rules if/when I copy any of their content.
Last edited by Trilby (2013-06-22 14:45:41)
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
Good point Trilby.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
Hmm, I'm actually thinking I can support these tools that download the videos (but I'm not a lawyer!). The terms of service make it clear that whomever *posts* a video to youtube retains full ownership of the video for copyright purposes.
If I were to download any html content produced by youtube, then I would be subject to youtube's restrictions. But if I download only the video itself, I have not downloaded nor copied *any* content that youtube owns or hold a copyright on. So their restrictions are irrelevant. They can no more restrict me from using someone else's content (only the copyright holder can), than they can restrict me from reading a book I checked out at the library: it's not their material, which they admit in their own terms of service.
Last edited by Trilby (2013-06-22 14:56:48)
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
OP - Have you solved your problem?
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
well still loking for some program to watch yt i agree with paragraph 4C but i CANT using flash / firefox to watch movies properly so i'm looking for some advice or tips how i can watch yt from program.
Offline
Try html5 or pepper-based flash, as already have been suggested.
Offline
Well html5 can work with some movies on youtbe, but not at all, also i'm watching movies from other site where html5 is not supported so i cant use it.
About paper-based flash is for chromium how i guess ?
/add
btw HTML5 got same problem with fullscreen like flashplugin its not working on twin view displays
Last edited by McQueenNewbie (2013-06-22 16:08:14)
Offline
About paper-based flash is for chromium how i guess ?
Yup, at least chrome & chromium.
Offline
i cant find any information about paper-based flash its some kind of plugin for chromium ?
Offline
i cant find any information about paper-based flash its some kind of plugin for chromium ?
Offline
yep 4c is pretty explicit and just means I wont use their service.
well still loking for some program to watch yt smile i agree with paragraph 4C but i CANT using flash / firefox to watch movies properly so i'm looking for some advice or tips how i can watch yt from program.
if you are to comply with there terms of service you can not use any program(outside of a web browser) to access their content.
so do other web site have to now get permission to create embedded links on their sites, blogs and whatnot. I understand this is them pertecting their cash cow with ads but I wonder when someone posts a video on thier site do they no forfiet the ownership of the original video.6c
Last edited by dag (2013-06-22 17:11:15)
--------------------------------------
alcoves wonder creates the wonder unto the ages; never lose that.
Offline
so i see i need to back to damn windows to watch movies in flash properly ?
btw
paper-flash fullscreen on dual screen is not working same like flashplugin on ff or chrome
Last edited by McQueenNewbie (2013-06-22 16:53:43)
Offline