You are not logged in.
Remember the research I did into ndevfs a few months ago? Well, the reason that no one uses it is that it's not really good for anything: it can't support more than one layer of folders. ALSA wouldn't work with it, DRI wouldn't work, I'm not even sure if loopback would work.
Is there a reason it's in there? As of right now, there's nothing that it can do that udev can't... :?
Offline
Remember the research I did into ndevfs a few months ago?
nope.
Offline
I can promise you that the patch won´t work with kernel 2.6.15 ;-)
Offline
It's not in there anymore.
[jvinet@earth ~]$ uname -r
2.6.14-ARCH
[jvinet@earth ~]$ cat /proc/filesystems | grep ndevfs
[jvinet@earth ~]$
Offline
Then why is the patch even used in the PKGBUILD?
[proteus@localhost ~]$ ls /var/abs/kernels/kernel26
PKGBUILD kallsyms-compression.patch
acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.7d-2.6.12.patch kernel26.install
acpi-fixup.patch logo_linux_clut224.ppm
config ndevfs.patch
And it's included as a dependency:
source=(ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-$basekernel.tar.bz2
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-$pkgver.bz2
config logo_linux_clut224.ppm
ndevfs.patch
acpi-dsdt-initrd-v0.7d-2.6.12.patch
#ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/$basekernel/acpi-20050902-$basekernel.diff.bz2
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.11/2.6.11-ck1/patches/nvidia_6111-6629_compat2.diff)
Offline
Yup. So is the acpi-dsdt patch and the nvidia one, but they're not in the latest kernel either.
Sometimes its easier to comment out a patch if we think we might need it again in the future. Sometimes we forget (or don't bother) to comment them out in the source array, but it doesn't hurt anything.
Offline
Ah, I get it. Thanks.
Offline