unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

sxe · 2013-07-10 21:07:06

Thanks graysky!

graysky · 2013-07-11 01:05:37

graysky wrote:

... I want to hold off building these for the repo for a few days while I run linux-ck on my own machine looking for obvious show stoppers...

I have power cycled two machines over a dozen time now with the ck kernel and not a single freeze. I will push the 3.10 series to the repo now. Plz report any problems in the AUR; this thread is for issues related to the repo only, not the packages themselves.

As always, the previous 2-pt release and related packages (in this case 3.9.10-1-ck) are available in the archive section of repo-ck.com for manual download if need be.

Last edited by graysky (2013-07-16 00:55:16)

bwat47 · 2013-07-11 19:37:14

Noticed two big issues when upgrading from 3.9.9 ck to 3.10 ck, but they both appear to be upstream bugs

1. total gabrage on screen when resume from suspend: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60530

2. At random resume from suspend is just totally hung, black screen, no busy cursor or anything. Not sure what it was since I couldn't get logs, but think it might have been: http://seife.kernalert.de/blog/2013/07/ … linux-310/

Last edited by bwat47 (2013-07-11 19:37:26)

fsckd · 2013-07-13 04:18:15

mod action: Split Haswell issue back to its own thread.

graysky · 2013-07-13 21:17:47

@ bwat47 - 3.10.1 was just released. Wait 4 h and d/l it from the repo or build yourself from the AUR to see if either of the issues you mentioned are fixed. Upstream changelog: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/13/115

bwat47 · 2013-07-13 23:01:54

graysky wrote:

@ bwat47 - 3.10.1 was just released. Wait 4 h and d/l it from the repo or build yourself from the AUR to see if either of the issues you mentioned are fixed. Upstream changelog: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/13/115

cool, i'll check it out

Last edited by bwat47 (2013-07-13 23:02:51)

BahbGTR · 2013-07-14 02:01:06

Graysky, you rock! The newest release fixed my problems!

graysky · 2013-07-14 02:02:19

Upstream fixed your problems, I just package/host ;p Glad you're up and running 100 %.

Last edited by graysky (2013-07-14 02:02:34)

BahbGTR · 2013-07-14 02:04:13

Regardless, thanks for the packaging! After this, I'm sold on Arch. Goodbye, Gentoo!

bwat47 · 2013-07-14 03:04:21

graphical artifacts seem to be fixed, but suspend hang still happens .

I think its this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour … ug/1196155

@graysky Would is be possible for you to build linux-ck with: CONFIG_INTEL_MEI*=m, so I we can blacklist the mei module and avoid this bug?

EDIT: Nope, after a few more suspends graphics corruption bug still there, guess they haven't fixed it in the kernel yet.

Last edited by bwat47 (2013-07-14 05:07:39)

graysky · 2013-07-14 10:18:13

@bwat - I saw your flyspray on this issue. Are you saying that you compiled from the AUR switching it to a module that you blacklisted and tested? When you edited your post at 1:07 AM, are you then stating that even under this condition, your problem remains?

bwat47 · 2013-07-14 12:21:18

They are two separate issues. The MEI issue is what I thought caused the total suspend hangs. I just finished compiling from the aur with it as a module and blacklisting it, but unfortunately the issue seemed to remain (suspend was still hanging), so maybe it is a different bug than I thought it was (although that was the only linux 3.10 bug I found via google that sounded like my issue).

The graphics corruption bug is a different one. I thought it was fixed in 3.10.1, but after a few more suspend/resumes I saw it again, so I guess it just hasn't been fixed in 3.10.1

Last edited by bwat47 (2013-07-14 12:22:05)

graysky · 2013-07-14 14:40:03

Sorry to hear it. For what it's worth, if you read through the Ubuntu bug report you found and referenced in your flyspray, they committed the hard-code --> module. Anyway, to keep this thread on topic in the future, plz make a new thread for issue with the packages themselves. This thread is really for issues with the repo itself.

tekstryder · 2013-07-15 14:19:22

Hi Graysky. Thanks for your work in maintaining the CK patchset! I've been happily using your nehalem builds without issues for a long time now, up until kernel 3.9.

Throughout the ck-3.9.x series, and now continuing into 3.10.1-2, I've been having what sounds like the same issue as bwat47 regarding failure to suspend properly. The details are described in the kernel thread:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=165922

I'll create a separate thread to track this issue if you'd like, but it's already been discussed here (OT), and in the linked thread. Didn't want to make more noise than necessary.

graysky · 2013-07-15 19:44:40

I replied in your thread; let's keep this one focused down on issues related to the repo/my packages only.

graysky · 2013-07-16 00:56:13

Just as an FYI - I just built the (I think) last stable upstream release in the 3.9 series: 3.9.10-1-ck. It resides in the archive section for those not yet wanting to jump to the 3.10 series.

EDIT: Nope, now 3.9.11 has officially been announced as the final release in the 3.9 series. It has been built and resides in the archive section for those not yet wanting to jump to the 3.10 series.

Last edited by graysky (2013-07-21 07:48:50)

enihcam · 2013-07-17 04:14:21

graysky. Thanks for maintaining the CK patchset! However, it also brought me worries about when you might retire from this work. Will you have a backup/successor? Or do you have instructions in building/maintaining the repository?

cpatrick08 · 2013-07-17 05:36:16

I installed the linux-ck-sandybridge-3.10.1-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz & /linux-ck-sandybridge-headers-3.10.1-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz but when I rebooted I did not find the kernel in the grub menu. When I got back to desktop i reinstalled then them ran sudo grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg rebooted and still did not find the kernel in grub menu

graysky · 2013-07-17 08:52:56

Enihcam - no plans to stop but I'm sure that if I do, I will seek out someone to keep it up.

Cpatrick08 - not sure what to tell you... Did mkinitcpio run and generate images? Was your /boot mounted at the time?

cpatrick08 · 2013-07-17 17:07:20

graysky wrote:

Cpatrick08 - not sure what to tell you... Did mkinitcpio run and generate images? Was your /boot mounted at the time?

I guess it did not because when I ran sudo mkinitcpio -p linux-ck and then ran sudo grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg and rebooted it showed up

graysky · 2013-07-17 17:40:50

No idea why it didn't work for you. Can you do me a favor? Remove the packages, and reinstall them. Did the images get auto generated for you? Works on my boxes.

WonderWoofy · 2013-07-17 17:53:41

I don't think you even need to uninstall them. Just reinstall the package (ie. "pacman -S linux-ck").

graysky · 2013-07-17 19:23:59

@WonderW - You are correct I think... I am too lazy to look into mkinitcpio to see if it doesn't build am image if there is already one on the filesystem.

WonderWoofy · 2013-07-17 19:34:32

You don't have to look into mkinitcpio, just use pacscripts to look at the install script for your package. In the case of reinstallation, it will simply run the post_install() again, which means that (in the case of the ARCH kernel), it will run "mkinitcpio -p linux${KERNEL_NAME}" again. If you were to simply run "mkinitpcio -p linux-ck" on the CLI, then it would rebuild/replace the existing initramfs'.

Thaodan · 2013-07-18 14:54:50

Do you applied the patch from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60530 to your builds to fix suspend on systems using intel hd gpus?

Arch Linux

#1426 2013-07-10 21:07:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1427 2013-07-11 01:05:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1428 2013-07-11 19:37:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1429 2013-07-13 04:18:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1430 2013-07-13 21:17:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1431 2013-07-13 23:01:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1432 2013-07-14 02:01:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1433 2013-07-14 02:02:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1434 2013-07-14 02:04:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1435 2013-07-14 03:04:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1436 2013-07-14 10:18:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1437 2013-07-14 12:21:18

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1438 2013-07-14 14:40:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1439 2013-07-15 14:19:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1440 2013-07-15 19:44:40

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1441 2013-07-16 00:56:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1442 2013-07-17 04:14:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1443 2013-07-17 05:36:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1444 2013-07-17 08:52:56

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1445 2013-07-17 17:07:20

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1446 2013-07-17 17:40:50

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1447 2013-07-17 17:53:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1448 2013-07-17 19:23:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1449 2013-07-17 19:34:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1450 2013-07-18 14:54:50

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer