unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2013-07-18 18:40:07

@Thaodan - Which patch is effective? There seems to be mixed comments in the bug report. Perhaps I can include once they recommend a final fix and commit/close the bug report. I tend to follow the lead of the Arch devs with regard fix patches.

Last edited by graysky (2013-07-18 18:40:36)

Thaodan · 2013-07-18 20:23:27

graysky wrote:

@Thaodan - Which patch is effective? There seems to be mixed comments in the bug report. Perhaps I can include once they recommend a final fix and commit/close the bug report. I tend to follow the lead of the Arch devs with regard fix patches.

I should fix image corruption with intel hd gpus after suspend.
EDIT: I tested it a bit wotks for me currently (intel 3rd gen).
EDIT2:
Status changed see:

Ok, I think this is the real fix (since I've gotten other confirmations on irc, too). Patch merged to drm-intel-fixes, will get forwarded soon and then trickle back to stable trees:
commit 94a335dba34ff47cad3d6d0c29b452d43a1be3c8
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Wed Jul 17 14:51:28 2013 +0200
drm/i915: correctly restore fences with objects attached
Thanks everyone for reporting this issue and testing stuff.

Last edited by Thaodan (2013-07-18 22:30:57)

graysky · 2013-07-21 07:47:11

@Thaodan - Please open a bug report against [core]/linux as soon as possible so tpowa and the others devs can see this and can decide if it is important enough to add ahead of upstream since it is still out-of-tree.

graysky · 2013-07-21 07:50:37

Just as an FYI - I just built the final stable upstream release in the 3.9 series: 3.9.11-1-ck. It resides in the archive section for those not yet wanting to jump to the 3.10 series. Remember that this section is not indexed so you will have to manually install packages from it and use an IgnoreGroup = ck-xxx in /etc/pacman.conf to keep them in place.

Thaodan · 2013-07-21 13:55:19

graysky wrote:

@Thaodan - Please open a bug report against [core]/linux as soon as possible so tpowa and the others devs can see this and can decide if it is important enough to add ahead of upstream since it is still out-of-tree.

There already an bugreport: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36107 is this enough or should I open a new task?

graysky · 2013-07-21 15:03:02

@Thaodan - Nope, perfect!

Last edited by graysky (2013-07-21 16:02:43)

graysky · 2013-07-21 16:02:51

I will add the committed patch[1] you referenced to 3.10.2-1-ck when upstream code is officially released. I have been running 3.10.2rc2-ck-1 without problems for >24 h now. The lkml announcment by Greg KH indicated that 'Sun Jul 21 05:25:08 UTC 2013' was the deadline so the patch should come out any time now. Note that 3.9.11 came out about 14 h ago.

1. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm … d43a1be3c8

Last edited by graysky (2013-07-21 16:04:09)

Thaodan · 2013-07-21 20:38:43

Yes I added it too,

graysky · 2013-07-22 21:39:26

I am building 3.10.2-1-ck for the repo now. It includes the aforementioned patch reported to fix this graphical corruption for Intel HD4000 users. Please let me know if it solves the problem.

Roberth · 2013-07-23 10:53:19

It doesn't fix it for me, I have HD2000, it is greatly reduces it through for me.

Last edited by Roberth (2013-07-23 10:53:31)

MrCode · 2013-07-23 17:58:38

I dunno if this has been the case for anyone else, but repo-ck has been going pretty slow for me the last couple updates. I'm getting ~20 KiB/s as I write this post downloading the latest linux-ck-nehalem. Is there something going on on the ISP end or such?

WonderWoofy · 2013-07-23 19:13:11

@MrCode, I have experienced ups and downs from graysky's repo in terms of speed. Sometimes it does go super slow, like you are seeing, other times I get 4MB/s, and sometimes it fluctuates between super fast and super slow.

Unfortunately, when I have asked graysky about this in the past, he has told me that godaddy just kind of sucks.

graysky · 2013-07-23 20:09:20

Yeah, godaddy sucks. If you guys don't mind, please send a email to them complaining of slow xfer rates to the domain repo-ck.com which is a hosted server by godaddy. Email addy should be webmaster@godaddy.com

ar17787ar17787 · 2013-07-24 02:53:56

Hi I've been following the suspend issue now for about a week. I was hoping the 3.10.2 kernel would fix it for me I want to run the ck core2 kernel but currently can't suspend.

not looking for a fix it will probably come through upstream just thought I would post there is an issue here with these specs for others
Processor = Core2Quad Q6600
Video = Nvidia 650ti

I'm pretty sure it's not the intel graphics for me because well obviously I don't use intel graphics.

the current Arch core repo suspends fine... just doesn't boot as quickly.

Should also point out I am new to Arch and have never played with it's kernel before but I followed the Wiki to the letter. The ck kernel boots fine it just refuses to wake from suspend to RAM. So I don't think it's a user issue but I may be wrong.

sorry if this belongs somewhere else

Cheers,

AR

graysky · 2013-07-24 08:50:26

I believe the recent patch only fixes the problem for intel folks. I suggest posting to ck's blog if this issue is related to his patchset.

ar17787ar17787 · 2013-07-24 09:49:54

I've already had a look there and someone with similar (not same) specs to mine i.e intel chip with nvidia graphics is having the issue as well.

There are some patches I should try but I am lazy and will just wait.

Thanks!

Konstantin_hu · 2013-07-27 10:18:36

What about to include tuxonice? Currently I am using uswsusp, but it always hangs up when resuming.

graysky · 2013-07-27 10:44:27

Konstantin_hu wrote:

What about to include tuxonice? Currently I am using uswsusp, but it always hangs up when resuming.

I have no plans to include it but you are welcome to modify the PKGBUILD to add whatever you wish.

Thaodan · 2013-07-28 14:18:22

graysky wrote:

Konstantin_hu wrote:
What about to include tuxonice? Currently I am using uswsusp, but it always hangs up when resuming.
I have no plans to include it but you are welcome to modify the PKGBUILD to add whatever you wish.

Or just use Linux with pf patch-set eg- linux-pf it includes linux-ck patches and tuxonice.

Konstantin_hu · 2013-07-28 15:28:30

I see, but the compilation from source consumes a lot of time. It is more convenient to install pre-compiled packages.

WonderWoofy · 2013-07-28 15:43:34

@Konstantin_hu, this page will get you what you want.

graysky · 2013-07-28 16:04:40

Konstantin_hu wrote:

I see, but the compilation from source consumes a lot of time. It is more convenient to install pre-compiled packages.

@Kon - I compile 28 different package sets for repo-ck (kernel, headers, nvidia, nvidia-304xx, and broadcom). It take ~4 h to compile a full set of kernel packages for the repo. You'll have to use another package from another unofficial repo or compile up a modd'ed version of linux-ck yourself.

3.10.3-1
linux-ck-generic-i686 built in 0h:8m:36s
linux-ck-atom-i686 built in 0h:8m:26s
linux-ck-core2-i686 built in 0h:8m:26s
linux-ck-nehalem-i686 built in 0h:8m:30s
linux-ck-sandybridge-i686 built in 0h:8m:28s
linux-ck-ivybridge-i686 built in 0h:8m:26s
linux-ck-p4-i686 built in 0h:8m:24s
linux-ck-pentm-i686 built in 0h:8m:31s
linux-ck-kx-i686 built in 0h:8m:27s
linux-ck-k10-i686 built in 0h:8m:26s
linux-ck-barcelona-i686 built in 0h:8m:24s
linux-ck-bobcat-i686 built in 0h:8m:24s
linux-ck-bulldozer-i686 built in 0h:8m:29s
linux-ck-piledriver-i686 built in 0h:8m:25s
linux-ck-generic-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:35s
linux-ck-atom-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:36s
linux-ck-core2-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:34s
linux-ck-nehalem-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:36s
linux-ck-sandybridge-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:46s
linux-ck-ivybridge-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:44s
linux-ck-haswell-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:41s
linux-ck-p4-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:27s
linux-ck-kx-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:35s
linux-ck-k10-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:36s
linux-ck-barcelona-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:37s
linux-ck-bobcat-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:34s
linux-ck-bulldozer-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:37s
linux-ck-piledriver-x86_64 built in 0h:8m:34s

Konstantin_hu · 2013-07-28 17:08:52

My PC is rather old, 2.4 gHz Pentium 4, 2 GB RAM.

Konstantin_hu · 2013-07-29 12:57:51

WonderWoofy wrote:

@Konstantin_hu, this page will get you what you want.

Thx, I have tried linux-pf-p4 with TuxOnIce and after some configuration hibernation now seems to be working.

MrCode · 2013-08-06 20:08:47

I'm not sure if this is affecting anyone else, but it seems that the latest nvidia-ck package isn't working for me (Xorg gives me "no screens found"). Is it possible that this version doesn't compile against the current kernel, or is it just a faux-pas on my end (or possibly a repo sync problem)?

For now I'm sticking with 319.32-4.

Arch Linux

#1451 2013-07-18 18:40:07

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1452 2013-07-18 20:23:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1453 2013-07-21 07:47:11

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1454 2013-07-21 07:50:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1455 2013-07-21 13:55:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1456 2013-07-21 15:03:02

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1457 2013-07-21 16:02:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1458 2013-07-21 20:38:43

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1459 2013-07-22 21:39:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1460 2013-07-23 10:53:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1461 2013-07-23 17:58:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1462 2013-07-23 19:13:11

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1463 2013-07-23 20:09:20

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1464 2013-07-24 02:53:56

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1465 2013-07-24 08:50:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1466 2013-07-24 09:49:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1467 2013-07-27 10:18:36

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1468 2013-07-27 10:44:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1469 2013-07-28 14:18:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1470 2013-07-28 15:28:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1471 2013-07-28 15:43:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1472 2013-07-28 16:04:40

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1473 2013-07-28 17:08:52

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1474 2013-07-29 12:57:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1475 2013-08-06 20:08:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer