Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

mnyak · 2013-07-28 21:57:49

Hi,

When I try to do something with svn, I get the error below;

svn: error while loading shared libraries: libsasl2.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

I removed and reinstalled subversion by pacman, but the problem still remains..

Is there any idea to solve this problem?

Thank you for all spending time to read this..

ewaller · 2013-07-28 22:22:46

Before I do any research, is your system fully up to date?

Please do a pacman -Syu and try again.

Edit: Oh, and welcome to the Arch Linux forums

Last edited by ewaller (2013-07-28 22:23:22)

mnyak · 2013-07-28 23:54:56

First of all thank you, I am glad to be here

I did pacman -Syu, but whenever I do it, after synchronising package databases, it asks for some lines of replacement and then it finds some conflicts to ask for removing them. Then I say remove those conflicts and pacman gives me the error below;

error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: lib32-qt: requires qt
:: package-query: requires pacman<4.1

Error at the first post is occured after I did steps above..

karol · 2013-07-29 00:29:11

I don't know where did you get lib32-qt from, but package-query is not in the official repos, so you should either use an unofficial repo that provides it or remove it, update your system and reinstall package-query from the AUR.
What do you need lib32-qt for? Is it a dependency for some other package?

mnyak · 2013-07-29 00:48:38

It must be a dependency for some other package, I don't remember that I installed it especially.

karol · 2013-07-29 00:51:20

You can check it with 'pacman -Qi lib32-qt'.

cfr · 2013-07-29 01:00:00

Welcome to the forums.

mnyak wrote:

I did pacman -Syu, but whenever I do it, after synchronising package databases, it asks for some lines of replacement and then it finds some conflicts to ask for removing them. Then I say remove those conflicts and pacman gives me the error below;
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: lib32-qt: requires qt
:: package-query: requires pacman<4.1
Error at the first post is occured after I did steps above..

This really is the sort of thing which should have been in your first post. Not being able to update your system is a serious issue and likely to be the cause of all kinds of issues. In fact, this is what should be your primary concern!

Note that lib32-qt4 IS a package in the main repos. How long have you been unable to update your system for? lib32-qt4 replaced lib32-qt.

Last edited by cfr (2013-07-29 01:03:40)

mnyak · 2013-07-29 01:12:41

I had some hard courses in the university, so I couldn't find enough time to care of my system.

Now I deleted lib32-qt. I found lib32-qt4 if I can use it instead, but I can not install lib32-qt4 because it is in conflict with qt.

This is the current error;

error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: package-query: requires pacman<4.1

Last edited by mnyak (2013-07-29 01:16:00)

karol · 2013-07-29 01:20:10

As I said, remove package-query, update your system, install package-query back.
package-query is not an official package, so you, the user, have to take care of updating it.

cfr · 2013-07-29 01:21:14

It is not a question of needing to delete it. pacman should have replaced it. However, provided you removed it normally (e.g. pacman -R lib32-qt) all should be fine.

As for package-query, karol already told you what you need to do to deal with that.

EDIT: The Archivist is too quick for me .

When did you last successfully run pacman -Syu?

Have you been doing partial updates as your earlier posts suggest?

I'm asking because depending on what you've done or not done it is going to be more or less difficult to upgrade successfully. So the advice people give you is going to depend on the answers. It would therefore be really helpful (to you) if you could give us a sense of when you last updated successfully and whether you have done partial upgrades since.

Last edited by cfr (2013-07-29 01:23:13)

mnyak · 2013-07-29 01:32:21

I am not sure but most probably it must be in last february or march that I run pacman -Syu. Is there any file like log files that I can look for it? By the way, I don't remember that I did partial upgrades.

It has been a few mounts since I last cared of my system and actually my system seems like a mess for me. Is it better to reinstall Arch?

Last edited by mnyak (2013-07-29 01:36:54)

cfr · 2013-07-29 01:37:53

Well you did a failed pacman -Syu followed by pacman -R subversion and pacman -S subversion. So that is a partial update. Of course, if that is all, it won't be a problem.

You can look in /var/log/pacman.log to see what you've done. This will also tell you if you've done partial updates e.g. using pacman -Sy <pkg> or pacman -Sy and then pacman -S <pkg>. Sounds like maybe not, though, so that will make things a bit easier.

You are going to need to read the News back to the point where you last upgraded so that you can follow the instructions required to navigate the various changes in Arch. Most recently, the changes to filesystem require manual intervention.

EDIT: Looks like qt4 replaced qt at the beginning of March (judging by the News) so your last update must have been prior to St. David's Day (1st March).

EDIT EDIT: On the basis of what you've told us, there should be no need to reinstall Arch. If you were current prior to March, there's probably one major upheaval to take care of and that's the recent move of all binaries to /usr/bin and the update to the filesystem package. But that's not a good reason to reinstall. In what way in your system a mess? I mean, is there something besides it just being out of date?

Last edited by cfr (2013-07-29 01:46:39)

ewaller · 2013-07-29 02:25:24

Sorry, I was off working in the yard and having some dinner. I see that the issue does seem to be one of partial updates. You are updating an old system. BE AWARE of a really nasty one that bit many Archers; The infamous file system upgrade. Please, please read this news item closely. If you don't, I will make you read all thirty three pages of this thread as penance.

Last edited by ewaller (2013-07-29 02:25:59)

cfr · 2013-07-29 02:30:09

ewaller wrote:

I will make you read all thirty three pages of this thread as penance.

How?

In any case, if the OP fails to heed your advice, there will be plenty of penance regardless.

Last edited by cfr (2013-07-29 02:32:12)

jasonwryan · 2013-07-29 02:40:25

cfr wrote:

ewaller wrote:
I will make you read all thirty three pages of this thread as penance.
How?

There is a little known, and sadly underused, function on the forums that, once implemented, means that any designated account must click through a stipulated series of pages--with a minimum time set per page.

I have been advocating tirelessly for the activation of said feature for months now but the mods have been deadlocked. Until now. It looks as though ewaller has just tipped the balance and we will be able to roll this out...

ewaller · 2013-07-29 02:54:04

Sorry about that

Arch Linux

#1 2013-07-28 21:57:49

Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#2 2013-07-28 22:22:46

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#3 2013-07-28 23:54:56

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#4 2013-07-29 00:29:11

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#5 2013-07-29 00:48:38

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#6 2013-07-29 00:51:20

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#7 2013-07-29 01:00:00

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#8 2013-07-29 01:12:41

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#9 2013-07-29 01:20:10

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#10 2013-07-29 01:21:14

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#11 2013-07-29 01:32:21

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#12 2013-07-29 01:37:53

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#13 2013-07-29 02:25:24

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#14 2013-07-29 02:30:09

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#15 2013-07-29 02:40:25

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

#16 2013-07-29 02:54:04

Re: Svn : libsasl2.so.2 not found

Board footer