You are not logged in.

#1 2013-09-11 15:16:59

mamamia88
Member
Registered: 2012-08-29
Posts: 483

Minitube Upgrade Appears to be Same Version

I just upgraded minitube via pacman to 2.1.1 but in the about section it still says 2.0 and the new subscription feature isn't present.  This is even after a reboot.  Is it possible the arch developers accidently named the package wrong?

Offline

#2 2013-09-11 15:28:07

karol
Archivist
Registered: 2009-05-06
Posts: 25,440

Re: Minitube Upgrade Appears to be Same Version

Maybe it's related to https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 2#p1303452 ?


http://flavio.tordini.org/forums/topic/ … ource-code
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … e5f4388898 - no idea where did they get the source from

Last edited by karol (2013-09-11 15:31:27)

Offline

#3 2013-09-11 15:48:36

mamamia88
Member
Registered: 2012-08-29
Posts: 483

Re: Minitube Upgrade Appears to be Same Version

I honestly have no idea where they got the sources from. But they released an update this morning so obviously they either did or made a naming mistake.   Did anyone else upgrade this package to confirm I'm not crazy?

Last edited by mamamia88 (2013-09-11 15:49:30)

Offline

#4 2013-09-11 16:20:13

karol
Archivist
Registered: 2009-05-06
Posts: 25,440

Re: Minitube Upgrade Appears to be Same Version

mamamia88 wrote:

Did anyone else upgrade this package to confirm I'm not crazy?

I can't find the new subscription feature and the version in the 'About' window says 2.0, even though I've installed minitube 2.1-1.

This means you're not crazy and you have to go to school / work tomorrow.

Offline

#5 2013-09-11 20:02:57

Barthalion
Forum Fellow
From: Poland
Registered: 2010-02-26
Posts: 111

Re: Minitube Upgrade Appears to be Same Version

You got me, I'm crazy. Unfortunately I still have to go to work.

This is how upgrading packages without contact with the maintainer ends. Not sure yet if I will use epoch for that or we will wait for a real 2.1 release.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB