You are not logged in.

#1 2013-09-30 10:06:43

graysky
Wiki Maintainer
From: :wq
Registered: 2008-12-01
Posts: 10,605
Website

Low power CPU (Intel Atom) to control RAID1 array (mdadm) [solved]

Can anyone comment on the CPU overhead associated with using a low power CPU such as an Intel Atom to function as a NAS running software raid1 (mdadm)?  Will it limit I/O?

Last edited by graysky (2013-10-02 07:32:08)


CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck  • AUR packagesZsh and other configs

Offline

#2 2013-09-30 12:57:42

R00KIE
Forum Fellow
From: Between a computer and a chair
Registered: 2008-09-14
Posts: 4,734

Re: Low power CPU (Intel Atom) to control RAID1 array (mdadm) [solved]

Logic says raid0/raid1 should not be much of a problem since you are splitting/dupplicating data without doing any or almost any math, raid5 or others that need to calculate parity information can be a problem with atom cpus I believe.

Maybe you should check review sites for NAS boxes reviews, most come with atom cpus inside and will probably give you a good idea of how your specific cpu model will perform.


R00KIE
Tm90aGluZyB0byBzZWUgaGVyZSwgbW92ZSBhbG9uZy4K

Offline

#3 2013-09-30 16:21:17

graysky
Wiki Maintainer
From: :wq
Registered: 2008-12-01
Posts: 10,605
Website

Re: Low power CPU (Intel Atom) to control RAID1 array (mdadm) [solved]

Good idea, thanks.


CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck  • AUR packagesZsh and other configs

Offline

#4 2013-10-02 07:34:38

graysky
Wiki Maintainer
From: :wq
Registered: 2008-12-01
Posts: 10,605
Website

Re: Low power CPU (Intel Atom) to control RAID1 array (mdadm) [solved]

Atom 330 works fine when copying over nfs; CPU usage is minimal.


CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck  • AUR packagesZsh and other configs

Offline

#5 2013-10-02 17:22:21

sitquietly
Member
From: On the Wolf River
Registered: 2010-07-12
Posts: 219

Re: Low power CPU (Intel Atom) to control RAID1 array (mdadm) [solved]

graysky wrote:

Atom 330 works fine when copying over nfs; CPU usage is minimal.

I thought so.  I have an Atom 330 system (but not as file server).  As for filesystems, jfs works well with that cpu because it seems to have a lower cpu demand than xfs/ext4.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB