You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I tried pacman -S openoffice-base and it's telling me file corrupted.
ideally I would like to install openoffice 2. However, I tried pacman -S openoffice2'
... and it just came up with #...
also, I downloaded rox but I can't get it to exec. I'm using enlightenment and not too sure how to add it to the app. menu which I imagine would be the easiest option (all the help guides on this talk about files which don't seem to exist in arch so I'm getting a bit lost...)
thanks-o!
Offline
Afaik, the openoffice packages are broken or some parts have been removed, I don't really know. As oo2 rc is in testing, you could fetch it there. Tpowa announced he would finish replacing 1.x with 2 soon after it is officially released, what will happen the next days.
Sorry, I can't help you with enlightenment.
Frumpus ♥ addict
[mu'.krum.pus], [frum.pus]
Offline
okay i got rox running- but only in root (i presume this is okay?)
so it's just the pacman -S command for installing open office 2 please!
Offline
As for Open Office 2, it's still in the testing repo until it moves from the Release Candidate to a final version. If you want to use it before then, you'll have to uncomment the testing repo in <code>/etc/pacman.conf</code> and then do something like:
# pacman -Sy testing/openoffice-base
Once that's installed, you can go back and comment out the testing repo in <code>/etc/pacman.conf</code> once again.
The rox issue, I'm not so sure about...I have it running just fine through Xfce and just have to use the command <code>rox</code> to launch it; my paths have apparently been taken care of properly...
Offline
pacman -S testing/packagename
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … n++testing
and furthermore
http://bbs.archlinux.org/search.php
PS: had some Wasabi Green Beans today?
Frumpus ♥ addict
[mu'.krum.pus], [frum.pus]
Offline
I'm pretty much a new Arch user but I have pretty much gotten use to pacman. I have the same prob with the openoffice-base from the extras repo. I get this
:: Retrieving packages from extra...
openoffice-base-2.0.1-1 [################] 100% 107665K 312.9K/s 00:01:28
checking package integrity...
error: archive openoffice-base-2.0.1-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted
Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong because it seems to be working for everyone else? I've been trying it for the last two days. I thought it was actually a corrupt package but I must have been wrong.
Offline
I also tried:
pacman -S -c -c
to clean the packages off my machine so I could re-download them.
Offline
try switching mirrors in /etc/pacman.d/* by moving one up on the list.
Offline
thanks man....that's something i've never messed with....i'll give it a try....again thanks
Offline
I didn't realize i could choose between all those mirrors actually (in extra)
Offline
after commenting out all but one repo...i still have the same prob....i've tried this with three different repos
Offline
Make sure you remove the file from /var/cache/packman/pkg/ before you try again. If pacman sees it there, it won't download it again from the server, keeping the corrupt one for the install.
Offline
yeah i rm'd it and I also tried pacman -S -c -c
it must be something in the gzip crc check
I'm the only one having this prob. It's the only file i have this prob with too. weird
Offline
Well I did get this worked out. I just now remembered to come back to post what I did to resolve this issue. I thought my prob was with FTP repos. Gzip's site said that 90% of crc errors were from ftp transfers in ascii. This should be binary. I fixed this by using only an http repo in the "extra" file. I still don't know how to fix the actual prob though. Why does pacman on my machine have a prob with using binary on FTP repos? Or how do I change it to do so?
Offline
You could try to download the packages with wget instead of pacman's internal downloader. To do so, uncomment the XferCommand line in your pacman.conf. And install wget if it's not on your system.
Offline
I think what he's noticed about rox is that you can run it as a user, but rox actually has administrator privileges over files. Does seem a little weird.
Offline
Pages: 1