CVSCedega problems

Aphelion · 2006-01-23 19:05:13

http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cvscedega

"In your home folder enter .WineCVS/sources/cvscedega/winex/tools/ In here you should find two folders named wrc and widl. In both of these you should find a file named ppl.l. In these files you have to remove the big comments at the top."

...now, what's a "big comment"?

pressh · 2006-01-23 19:54:45

I would say this is quite a big comment:

# GDM Configuration file.  You can use gdmsetup program to graphically
# edit this, or you can optionally just edit this file by hand.  Note that
# gdmsetup does not tweak every option here, just the ones most users
# would care about.  Rest is for special setups and distro specific
# tweaks.  If you edit this file, you should send the HUP or USR1 signal to
# the daemon so that it restarts: (Assuming you have not changed PidFile)
#   kill -USR1 `cat /var/run/gdm.pid`
# (HUP will make gdm restart immediately while USR1 will make gdm not kill
# existing sessions and will only restart gdm after all users log out)
#
# You can also use the gdm-restart and gdm-safe-restart scripts which just
# do the above for you.
#
# For full reference documentation see the gnome help browser under
# GNOME|System category.  You can also find the docs in HTML form on
# http://www.gnome.org/projects/gdm/
#
# NOTE: Some of these are commented out but still show their default values.
# If you wish to change them you must remove the '#' from the beginning of
# the line.  The commented out lines are lines where the default might
# change in the future, so set them one way or another if you feel
# strongly about it.
#
# Have fun! - George

but of course it depends on your definition of 'big'

btw, why don't you use the PKGBUILD so you can handle cedega with pacman?

Aphelion · 2006-01-23 20:17:54

I'll give it a shot...

Gullible Jones · 2006-01-23 20:18:27

Eh? I thought that comments were... Well, comments... You know, ignored. :?

BTW, have you tried Wine from the Extra repo? That's got good Direct X support.

Aphelion · 2006-01-23 20:34:50

pressh wrote:

btw, why don't you use the PKGBUILD so you can handle cedega with pacman?

So, how do I do that? I need to get the Cedega code via cvs, right? The .tgz on their website doesn't contain source code...

Aphelion · 2006-01-23 21:12:04

Or, does anyone know exactly WHAT to uncomment in these two files?

:?

test1000 · 2006-01-23 22:40:06

why would anyone want the old cedega anymore? (the one in cvs is aaaaages old). By now, wine should be able to run almost anything better than winex... am i right?

postlogic · 2006-01-24 13:03:47

What Aphelion wants to do is have a PKGBUILD for his subscribed Cedega binaries, with point2play, but the PKGBUILD in AUR is outdated.

Anyone willing to give it a shot?

iphitus · 2006-01-24 13:42:34

test1000 wrote:

why would anyone want the old cedega anymore? (the one in cvs is aaaaages old). By now, wine should be able to run almost anything better than winex... am i right?

No, and .. no.

Wine still lacks the copy protection support that Cedega has, which causes a lot of games to break.

Wine's implementation of DX is still weak compared to Cedega, whether a game works, is much more hit and miss, and certainly involves a lot more work.

iphitus

tlilja · 2006-01-24 14:13:17

postlogic wrote:

What Aphelion wants to do is have a PKGBUILD for his subscribed Cedega binaries, with point2play, but the PKGBUILD in AUR is outdated.
Anyone willing to give it a shot?

Shouldn't be much of a hassle to edit the one in AUR since Point2play is integrated in the Cedega binary nowadays. I have a _very_ basic PKGBUILD somewhere I made for 5.0.1 release.

postlogic · 2006-01-24 23:18:50

Well does it work?

test1000 · 2006-02-27 23:15:00

Wine still lacks the copy protection support that Cedega has, which causes a lot of games to break.
Wine's implementation of DX is still weak compared to Cedega, whether a game works, is much more hit and miss, and certainly involves a lot more work.
iphitus

yes, yes.. but i was talking about the one that are "free for grabs"; the one that everyone can download directly from some transgaming public cvs; Isn't that one really just the old winex, you know the release that were branched from wine before the license change!!?

that one doesn't really have much advantages to wine except perhaps the cp support does it?

i know the new cedega is better in some ways to newest wine.

vililikku · 2006-12-05 19:08:41

When i try compile cvs cedega with this guide: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cvscedega Method 2, i get this error:

./parser.y:285.8-14: warning: symbol tSTRING redeclared
./parser.y:285.16-21: warning: symbol tIDENT redeclared
./parser.y:285.23-30: warning: symbol tRAWDATA redeclared
conflicts: 2 shift/reduce
gcc -MMD -c  -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include  -march=athlon-xp -mmmx -m3dnow -msse -O2 -pipe -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fno-keep-static-consts -D__const=const -fno-strict-aliasing -Wa,--execstack -D__int8=char -D__int16=short -D__int32=int "-D__int64=long long" -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT  -o y.tab.o y.tab.c
flex -Cf  -d -8 ./parser.l
gcc -MMD -c  -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include  -march=athlon-xp -mmmx -m3dnow -msse -O2 -pipe -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fno-keep-static-consts -D__const=const -fno-strict-aliasing -Wa,--execstack -D__int8=char -D__int16=short -D__int32=int "-D__int64=long long" -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT  -o lex.yy.o lex.yy.c
lex.yy.c:7630: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before numeric constant
make[2]: *** [lex.yy.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/cvscedega/src/winex-build/tools/wrc'
make[1]: *** [wrc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/cvscedega/src/winex-build/tools'
make: *** [tools] Error 2
==> ERROR: Build Failed.  Aborting..

What can i do?

Arch Linux

#1 2006-01-23 19:05:13

CVSCedega problems

#2 2006-01-23 19:54:45

Re: CVSCedega problems

#3 2006-01-23 20:17:54

Re: CVSCedega problems

#4 2006-01-23 20:18:27

Re: CVSCedega problems

#5 2006-01-23 20:34:50

Re: CVSCedega problems

#6 2006-01-23 21:12:04

Re: CVSCedega problems

#7 2006-01-23 22:40:06

Re: CVSCedega problems

#8 2006-01-24 13:03:47

Re: CVSCedega problems

#9 2006-01-24 13:42:34

Re: CVSCedega problems

#10 2006-01-24 14:13:17

Re: CVSCedega problems

#11 2006-01-24 23:18:50

Re: CVSCedega problems

#12 2006-02-27 23:15:00

Re: CVSCedega problems

#13 2006-12-05 19:08:41

Re: CVSCedega problems

Board footer