unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2014-05-06 19:41:12

I found it, WW, thanks. I do not want to build the repo packages for a few days since past experiences show that I will be rebuilding them based on some little thing... I will depend on you guys to test out the ck packages in the AUR which I will upload soon. I just got linux-ck complete and am now working on broadcom-wl-ck and the rest.

EDIT: Seems ok on my test box. Building now. Should be live in a few hours.

Last edited by graysky (2014-05-06 23:13:19)

Perfect Gentleman · 2014-05-07 07:03:26

solved

Last edited by Perfect Gentleman (2014-05-07 07:57:27)

graysky · 2014-05-07 08:57:39

Godaddy sucks. They lock my account when I transfer too many files. In this case, I had to rebuild all packages due to the major version bump so it only allowed my rsync transfer to go until it hit whatever ridiculous limit is there and then reject. Was able to push it again this morning and I believe it went. I cannot check to be sure for a while.

bstaletic · 2014-05-07 09:19:54

Just a report:
I'm currently upgrading kernel, if it boot I'll edit. But graysky's update is up.

P.S. I have a problem downloading packages from cero-ck. First I tried to install linux-ck the download stopped, second try was successful. Today on first try download broke again, second try also broke, and third was successful. Everytime I retry to download it less there is to download, acording to my knowlage this is due to pacman caching the downloaded packages. Another thing: only linux-ck-sandybridge is failing, and other than that package I only use headers for the same kernel.

EDIT: It booted correctly.

Last edited by bstaletic (2014-05-07 09:21:37)

Perfect Gentleman · 2014-05-07 09:24:16

Reporting, linux-ck-haswell, linux-ck-k10, linux-ck-barcelona-x64_86 work fine so far.

eigengrau · 2014-05-07 11:22:27

Hooray for ck-3.14, and many thanks to graysky.
♪┌|°з°|┘♪ └|°ε°|┐♪ ┌|°з°|┘♪

GourdCaptain · 2014-05-07 15:25:51

Having the same issue with downloads being cut off midway through for the kernel package - I'm going to wait a day or so and hope for less congestion on the server.

elfio · 2014-05-07 15:41:04

I'm having issues with linux-ck-core2. Download speed is low and pacman closes the transfer.

Also I've just rebooted after a succesful update (it looked like it was) and got the backlight off. After a suspension it worked again. Could it be related?

Lucky me I saw the screen without backlight

Thank you guys

matthew02 · 2014-05-07 21:56:51

I had some trouble with VMWare, so I needed to downgrade my kernel. The link in the OP did not work for me. I went to http://repo-ck.com/old/ and found what I needed. Just thought this post might help save someone like me a minute and a google-search. Thanks for your awesome work graysky!

graysky · 2014-05-07 22:19:26

For those of you having issues, please try the official arch kernel to rule out the ck1 patch set as the cause of your issues. If other words, is it 3.14.x.

clfarron4 · 2014-05-07 22:31:19

clfarron4 wrote:

Jristz wrote:
Well, probably error will the same, but the next time I will take and screenshoot.
So if someone get one panic, take one too. this for discard architecture specific things. and maybe someone will know something about somepart.
mean where is bfq upstream??? as far I underestood ConColivas (or whatever they name is) is upstream for the schedule bfs only, no??
BFQ Upstream can be found here: http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/
Yeah, I'll need to see if I can get these kernel panics again.

@Jristz: I finally managed to get the kernel panic with my linux-lts package (though I've had it with linux-lqx as well) with BFQ set as default in CONFIG. Here's a screenshot.

EDIT: Even better, I managed to get a kernel panic with the linux-ck-k10 package with BFQ set with elevator=bfq. See Google+ post.

EDIT2: I should say that I am using a LVM on LUKS system. @Jristz, are using an LVM on LUKS system?

Last edited by clfarron4 (2014-05-07 22:57:26)

Miblo · 2014-05-07 22:34:02

Just to let you know that -ck-kx is working beautifully for me. It's only been alive two hours and hasn't done anything strenuous, but all is well so far. Cheers, graysky.

bstaletic · 2014-05-07 22:41:41

There is no problem with downloading official kernel, I upgraded and tried it as soon as it became available in official repo. The problem is only manifesting when I try to donwload linux-ck-sandybridge.

But once the download is finished, everything works as it should, so I assume there's no problem in the package only in internet connection (I have 5Mbps download limit, but it never got that high whilst downloading the aforementioned package).

All in all, great work Graysky.

morlunk · 2014-05-07 23:36:04

Hi, I'm encountering an error trying to update nvidia-ck:

error: nvidia-ck: missing required signature
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/nvidia-ck-337.12-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).

Is the package not signed properly or is it an issue on my end? I've imported your key already.

Thanks!

graysky · 2014-05-08 00:39:38

Download speed issues are related to godaddy shitty hosting. If you have an invalid sig on a tarball, delete it and download again. The sigs are good and it sounds like they are doing what their intended role is to do. Running ck-haswell here without issues.

Last edited by graysky (2014-05-08 00:40:08)

eigengrau · 2014-05-08 07:05:49

graysky wrote:

Download speed issues are related to godaddy shitty hosting. If you have an invalid sig on a tarball, delete it and download again.

I keep having this issue with the nvidia-ck tarball, but redownloading always comes up with the same tarball. It seems there’s no .sig file server-side, could you check if time allows?

elfio · 2014-05-08 09:43:11

I've downgraded linux package to 3.14 and backlight at boot it's working again.
It's a known bug (kernel 3.14, intel graphics): https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76276
They say it's going to be solved in 3.15
Nothing else here.

Thank you guys again, you are the best

FrozenCow · 2014-05-08 10:04:59

eigengrau wrote:

I keep having this issue with the nvidia-ck tarball, but redownloading always comes up with the same tarball. It seems there’s no .sig file server-side, could you check if time allows?

I have the same problem. http://repo-ck.com/x86_64/nvidia-ck-337 … tar.xz.sig does not exist. This only happens for people having their `SigLevel = PackageRequired`, so maybe some others do not run into this problem if they're using `SigLevel = Optional`.

graysky · 2014-05-08 10:41:23

I will check later today. The sig optional is a good temporary work around.

graysky · 2014-05-08 18:51:37

Sure enough, nvidia-ck-337.12-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz was missing a sig. Fixed. Please try now.

FrozenCow · 2014-05-09 00:37:34

graysky wrote:

Sure enough, nvidia-ck-337.12-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz was missing a sig. Fixed. Please try now.

Hmm, I still get the same message. I've deleted the old file from `/var/cache/pacman/pkg/nvidia-ck-*`, used `pacman -Sy`, used `pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C` and installed the package with `pacman -S nvidia-ck`. I get the following message:

error: nvidia-ck: missing required signature
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/nvidia-ck-337.12-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] 
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))

It's strange that it says the package is "missing required signature" whereas http://repo-ck.com/x86_64/nvidia-ck-337 … tar.xz.sig does exist and is downloadable. Any idea? Is the sig's 404 page cached or something?

graysky · 2014-05-09 11:16:01

Try forcing a refresh `pacman -Syy` then try the install. Pacman may offer to delete the old pkg.tar.xz which is fine but will require you to run the install command twice.

mahkoh · 2014-05-09 18:39:55

Today I had to run Syu five times to get the new kernel. I hope you can fix the hosting problems soon but for now I'll switch back to the normal kernel.

graysky · 2014-05-09 19:43:47

Nothing I can do beyond continue to bitch about it to them... unless you would like to offer up a server on a fat pipe?

Jristz · 2014-05-09 22:20:51

@clfarron4 Not not runing LVM not LIKS but with the exeptions of the architecture references and LVM,LUKS refs too all the other look exactly like my panic

Analising you screenshots look like (for me) that not initialized completly, so maybe only maybeee a little delay could do something.

@graysky you are patching using v7r3 or v7r2 for the newer 3.14??

Arch Linux

#1801 2014-05-06 19:41:12

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1802 2014-05-07 07:03:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1803 2014-05-07 08:57:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1804 2014-05-07 09:19:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1805 2014-05-07 09:24:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1806 2014-05-07 11:22:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1807 2014-05-07 15:25:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1808 2014-05-07 15:41:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1809 2014-05-07 21:56:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1810 2014-05-07 22:19:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1811 2014-05-07 22:31:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1812 2014-05-07 22:34:02

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1813 2014-05-07 22:41:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1814 2014-05-07 23:36:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1815 2014-05-08 00:39:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1816 2014-05-08 07:05:49

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1817 2014-05-08 09:43:11

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1818 2014-05-08 10:04:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1819 2014-05-08 10:41:23

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1820 2014-05-08 18:51:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1821 2014-05-09 00:37:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1822 2014-05-09 11:16:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1823 2014-05-09 18:39:55

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1824 2014-05-09 19:43:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#1825 2014-05-09 22:20:51

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer