You are not logged in.
I have a very old and stuborn gateway solo 5300 laptop that refuses to boot form the disk I burned for arch linux, as well it refuses to boot from the usb disk I made with dd acording to Usb Flash Installation Media on the wiki
I also tryed UNetbootin: Install Arch Linux Without a CD From FTP.
It currently boots to windows xp, has two partitions and I wish to overwrite the entire hardrive. Do you have any sugestions?
Last edited by meschael (2014-06-27 02:03:56)
Offline
Are you trying using a 32 bit iso? I think all Celerons prior to about 2005 were 32 bits. A quick look indicated that machine is a teenager.
Worse, it appears your machine probably has 128MB of RAM. That won't do it. Even a fully loaded machine (512MB) would be of little (if any) use
Last edited by ewaller (2014-06-22 22:57:32)
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
As an aside, should you still want to put Arch on that laptop, see if it will do a PXE or Network boot-up. Some laptops need to enable this in their BIOS. I'm pretty sure the wiki covers this somewhere ... ah, here we go!
Offline
I agree the machine is very old to say the least, I only want to mostly fool around in a terminal and will be using my quad core desktop to do my real stuff. This is just for learning archlinux and determining if I will replace ubuntu with it in the future.
I was not sure how to get the 32bit version of archlinux but I can say the iso says i686 and I got it from https://www.archlinux.org/download using the torrent link.
I would be ok if it can't handle a window manager or desktop environment, though it is able to launch chrome in xp, with alot of lag of cource. I hope that I can find a way somehow to install it.
Offline
Thanks MoonSwan, I do have a pxe boot option in the bios and I have looked at that part of the wiki a few times but feared causing problems in my working ubuntu os, But I think that I am ready to try that option as it seems to be the only thing left for me to try.
Offline
Can I suggest you look at puppy or DSL (Damn Small Linux)? You might have more luck with those minimalist distros on that machine.
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
... Even a fully loaded machine (512MB) would be of little (if any) use
Really? I have a netbook with a total of 1G, and I never get anywhere close to using even half of that. Certainly this depends on the programs used - but for terminal only, 512MB would be more than enough IMHO. On my 1GB, I boot into X with a simple WM, and can use lightweight (but fully functional graphical) web browsers like luakit and dwb without getting anywhere near half RAM use.
If it is just 128MB, I agree that may be more of a problem. I wonder if Slitaz is still going - that was my favorite "micro" distro, but I have not kept track of the development in some time.
As for the main problem of the thread, I've reread your OP a couple of times, but I'm not sure I'm fully clear on your steps. First, unetbootin is expected to not work for arch. Have you made an iso using `dd`? Can you boot other live cds or usbs on the machine? In other words, is it a limitation of your hardware, or have the isos you've tried for arch just not worked yet?
Last edited by Trilby (2014-06-22 23:41:36)
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
[Update] Thanks for everyones support, I have given up the idea of installing archlinux on the laptop and will install it to a virtualmachine instead.
I did have some success in that the laptop found my server and tryed to load a configuration file which it could not find. After some investigation
I decided this was too much of a hassle for the old laptop.
Thanks.
Last edited by meschael (2014-06-23 00:10:53)
Offline
[Update] Thanks for everyones support, I have given up the idea of installing archlinux on the laptop and will install it to a virtualmachine instead....
I decided this was too much of a hassle for the old laptop.Thanks.
Wait, not so fast. Sometimes, my mind is like a sieve. I checked the beginner's guide, and it states that 64MB is the minimum. it should work.
But, I would be reluctant to do anything with less than 1GB
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
You could actually run your system from PXE, not just use PXE to install.
Last edited by nomorewindows (2014-06-23 13:15:02)
I may have to CONSOLE you about your usage of ridiculously easy graphical interfaces...
Look ma, no mouse.
Offline
No wories my friends, I decided to put the laptop away and then I deleted my windows 7 from a spare drive on my quad core desktop, so now Im trying to get archlinux working on that, with 4G of ram to work with and 4 cores I should be able to run at least a browser right
Now if I can only get this lxde problem solved, (another thread)
Offline
If you want to still install Arch on that other machine, and you have a means of attaching that old HDD to your quad-core machine, then you could simply install from your existing Arch. Then just boot the fallback initramfs on the old machine.
There is a guy on IRC who continually goes on and on about how old his machines are. He has some old Thinkpads, one of which is a Pentium2 I think with 128MB RAM. So it would seem that you probably could get it running...
Offline