You are not logged in.
http://www.blend4web.com/apps/embed/emb … scene.json
link blow is the application which render with a wrong result.
http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=74275the render result what i see.
http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=74276the right render result.
the graphic card i own is amd hd5450 with xf86-video-ati driver.
desktop environment is gnome.
i'm a newer user of archlinux. in ubuntu with the same conditions, the render result is correct.
i can't find what's wrong with it.
i hope help here to solve it. i'll be grateful.
Moderator edit (ewaller) Changed img tags to over sized pictures to url tags
Last edited by NightCandle (2014-07-23 16:09:04)
Offline
Welcome to Arch Linux. Be sure to read our policies, notably those related to the pasting of pictures. Some of our members are on metered or slow connections, so we limit the size of pictures.
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
The shortest way to ruin a country is to give power to demagogues.— Dionysius of Halicarnassus
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
thanks. i'll pay attention on it.
Offline
same results here with mesa-r* git .
Note
For Linux users - due to incomplete OpenGL implementation in open source drivers at the moment it is recommended to use current versions of proprietary drivers for Nvidia and AMD video cards.
are you certain you used the open source drivers on ubuntu ?
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
same results here with mesa-r* git .
blend4web wrote:Note
For Linux users - due to incomplete OpenGL implementation in open source drivers at the moment it is recommended to use current versions of proprietary drivers for Nvidia and AMD video cards.
are you certain you used the open source drivers on ubuntu ?
yes i use the open source drivers on ubuntu.
On archlinux. I try my best to install catalyst. But it to hard to deploy successfully.
Offline
Then there's either a regression in the open source driver, or ubuntu uses different settings then archlinux.
What version of mesa / xf86-video-ati do you use on ubuntu ?
By downgrading to the same versions on arch, we could verify if this a regression error or not.
As for catalyst :
the wiki has good instructions, and Vi0L0 unofficial repos appear to be best way to get them working.
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
Then there's either a regression in the open source driver, or ubuntu uses different settings then archlinux.
What version of mesa / xf86-video-ati do you use on ubuntu ?
By downgrading to the same versions on arch, we could verify if this a regression error or not.As for catalyst :
the wiki has good instructions, and Vi0L0 unofficial repos appear to be best way to get them working.
so grateful. i konw how to solve it.
thanks.
Offline
i failed on install catalyst once again. so i‘ll try other way to solve it.
I have know the reason why it error is enough.
The packages’s relation between xorg, gdm, graphic driver and gnome is too complicated to understand.
Offline