You are not logged in.
Hi,
Is it reasonable for a package from a higher order reposeitory to depend on a package from a lower order repository?
For example networkmanager from extra depends on libnewt from community.
Or evolution from extra depends on gtkspell3 from community.
So if we disable community then some packages from extra would have unresolvable dependencies.
Thanks
Last edited by zharf (2014-08-03 20:33:45)
Offline
Have you noticed this with anything not related to GNOME?
Offline
In https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38227
It has been well established that we do not much care about the repo hierarchy.
Offline
zharf,
if you're interested in these issues, check the arch-dev-public mailinglist.
integrity reports like these https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail … 26504.html are made regularly.
Most of the time people seem to ignore them.
Last edited by Lone_Wolf (2014-08-04 10:31:37)
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Online
Hi,
In https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38227
Allan wrote:It has been well established that we do not much care about the repo hierarchy.
So why community or AUR exist and why not let trusted users maintain packages in core and extra?
IMO obeying the law is mandatory for the ruler.
Thanks
Offline
So why community or AUR exist and why not let trusted users maintain packages in core and extra?
Nothing in the repos depends on the AUR. And only 33 packages (out of >3000) in [extra] depends on [community] packages.
IMO obeying the law is mandatory for the ruler.
There is no law... it is more a guideline...
Offline