You are not logged in.
dude. Linux and BSD's are free!
![]()
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
yeah, free as in free speech not in free beer. But i wasn't that serious, no one looses money if archlinux is not reachable or we couldn't set our avatars ![]()
Anyway, would be interesting to compare the tcos of arch, rh and solaris in a productive webserver environment.
Offline
tco is so ephemeral. I always found it to be a silly thing to try and genericize.
tco is heavily dependent upon your needs, your employee skillset (and the skillset of those managing your network), and pre-existing knowledge. Add to this usability, management, update cycles, security concerns, blah blah blah...
It is so dependent upon the problem domain, and the people using it, that I was always amazed when people can say, "the tco for this product is X, over the course of Y years"
o.O
That being said, I would imagine these 'generated statistics' for archlinux would be much inline with something like slackware. Maybe a hair more expensive, because more people have used slackware and are familiar with it.
tco always seemed silly to me..
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
But that's a problem in business math in general, economics even worse.
You have to create arguments to fortify your decisions. Nevertheless in a given environment you can compare at least in some points. I'm only interested because i like arch, but would'nt use it as a productive server. (and maybe I am wrong in my point of view)
Offline