You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I've already whined about it years ago https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=111448 , I wonder how other people are dealing with the strikethroughs that denote closed tasks. Browsing through e.g.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?string=intel&project=0&search_name=&type[]=&sev[]=&pri[]=&due[]=&reported[]=&cat[]=&status[]=&percent[]=&opened=&dev=&closed=&duedatefrom=&duedateto=&changedfrom=&changedto=&openedfrom=&openedto=&closedfrom=&closedto=&do=index
makes my eyes bleed, unless I'm using:
@-moz-document domain("bugs.archlinux.org") {
del { text-decoration: underline !important; }
a { text-decoration: none !important; }
}
in my userContent.css (I use firefox).
What are you using? You don't search through closed tasks at all? You don't mind the strikethoughs?
Offline
the strikethrough in the ID is readable for me (it only has numbers) , the summary is very hard to read .
Usually when checking closed bugs i do so for a specific package (those are not strikethrough-ed) , and just open them in separate tabs.
The strikethrough of the summary does seem unneccessary.
Maybe bugtracker should switch to using strikethrough for ID only ?
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
(A works at time B) && (time C > time B ) ≠ (A works at time C)
Offline
Looks fine to me, but I don't look through closed bugs that often.
Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD
Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.
Offline
I can read that with no extra effort, although I mistook "boot" for "beet" for like 1/4 of a second.
I wouldn't mind it. Then again I rarely go to the bug tracker, and never to closed bugs.
Offline
Pages: 1