unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

karol · 2014-11-12 18:12:40

Post the output of 'sudo pacman -Syyu'.

Run

LC_ALL=C <command>

to get the output in English.

nspacestd · 2014-11-12 18:44:16

@Scimmia Nope I'm using a single partition for the whole system.

$ LC_ALL=C sudo pacman -Syyu
[sudo] password for nspacestd: 
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 core                               118.5 KiB   356K/s 00:00 [################################] 100%
 extra                             1716.8 KiB   991K/s 00:02 [################################] 100%
 community                            2.4 MiB   649K/s 00:04 [################################] 100%
 multilib                           121.0 KiB   412K/s 00:00 [################################] 100%
 repo-ck                             45.5 KiB   189K/s 00:00 [################################] 100%
:: Starting full system upgrade...
 there is nothing to do

Scimmia · 2014-11-12 19:30:03

Ah, yeah, I didn't look at your output close enough, just assumed a common problem. Simply looks like the repo hasn't been reindexed yet.

karol · 2014-11-12 19:32:14

I've installed the new linux-ck-core2 3.17.2-1 for i686 just after nspacestd posted https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 8#p1474788

Scimmia · 2014-11-12 19:36:05

There's no update here for my x86_64 machine. So one arch got reindexed, one didn't.

graysky · 2014-11-12 19:56:53

That's crazy,.. the DTS on the db.tar.xz are correct. I just bumped and built nvidia-340xx to match ARCH/upstream and can confirm the DTS on both repos. Please try again, `pacman -Ss linux-ck` returns the correct versions for me.

Last edited by graysky (2014-11-12 19:58:42)

nspacestd · 2014-11-12 19:57:08

EDIT: About the failed sig check: the download from the web interface ended before it was complete, but I didn't notice since I was using Chromium instead of something like wget... My fault here

Last edited by nspacestd (2014-11-12 20:01:59)

graysky · 2014-11-12 19:59:45

You likely just need to sign my key:

# pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C && pacman-key --lsign-key 5EE46C4C

nspacestd · 2014-11-12 20:05:02

graysky wrote:

You likely just need to sign my key:
# pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C && pacman-key --lsign-key 5EE46C4C

Well, turns out that since I was using a browser (Chromium) I didn't notice the download ended in an incomplete transfer... Thanks anyway

rmi · 2014-11-12 21:10:07

Hi,

I just upgraded to 3.17.2-ck (I'm using the linux-ck-ivybridge package):

Linux roman-arch 3.17.2-1-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Nov 11 18:33:23 EST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux

The system boots up fine, but I've seen a few red lines at boot time so I thought I'd investigate.

Nov 12 21:46:21 roman-arch systemd[1]: systemd-modules-load.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Nov 12 21:46:21 roman-arch systemd[1]: Failed to start Load Kernel Modules.
Nov 12 21:46:21 roman-arch systemd[1]: Unit systemd-modules-load.service entered failed state.
Nov 12 21:46:21 roman-arch systemd[1]: systemd-modules-load.service failed.
[...]
Nov 12 21:46:21 roman-arch systemd-modules-load[217]: Failed to find module 'acpi_call'

systemd-modules-load.service - Load Kernel Modules
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-modules-load.service; static)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mi 2014-11-12 21:46:21 CET; 2min 4s ago
Docs: man:systemd-modules-load.service(8)
man:modules-load.d(5)
Process: 218 ExecStart=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-modules-load (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
Main PID: 218 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
Warning: Journal has been rotated since unit was started. Log output is incomplete or unavailable.

The normal (vanilla Arch) kernel does not have this problem. This only happen when booting the -ck kernel. This didn't happen with 3.16-ck either. Did I miss something?

Last edited by rmi (2014-11-12 21:10:53)

Scimmia · 2014-11-12 21:44:35

graysky wrote:

That's crazy,.. the DTS on the db.tar.xz are correct. I just bumped and built nvidia-340xx to match ARCH/upstream and can confirm the DTS on both repos. Please try again, `pacman -Ss linux-ck` returns the correct versions for me.

Yep, works now.

graysky · 2014-11-12 23:20:09

@rmi - you sure about that? I can't find that module under either ck1 or ARCH v3.17.2:

% find /lib/modules -name 'acpi*' | grep call

WorMzy · 2014-11-12 23:32:44

I don't think there has ever been a module called acpi_call in the mainline kernel.

There is this though: https://github.com/mkottman/acpi_call

@rmi: What does 'modinfo acpi_call' tell you when booted into the vanilla Arch kernel?

rmi · 2014-11-13 10:22:27

Hi,

thanks for your answers.

graysky wrote:

@rmi - you sure about that? I can't find that module under either ck1 or ARCH v3.17.2:

Yes, it's reproducible. The vanilla Kernel boots it just fine, 3.17.2-ck doesn't. Some more information with the vanilla kernel:

-> % modinfo acpi_call
filename: /lib/modules/3.17.2-1-ARCH/extramodules/acpi_call.ko.gz
license: GPL
depends:
vermagic: 3.17.0-1-ARCH SMP preempt mod_unload modversions

-> % find /lib/modules -name 'acpi*' | grep call
/lib/modules/extramodules-3.17-ARCH/acpi_call.ko.gz
-> % pacman -Si acpi_call
Repository : community
Name : acpi_call
Version : 1.1.0-14
Description : A linux kernel module that enables calls to ACPI methods through /proc/acpi/call
Architecture : x86_64
URL : http://github.com/mkottman/acpi_call
Licenses : GPL
Groups : None
Provides : None
Depends On : linux>=3.17 linux<3.18
Optional Deps : None
Conflicts With : None
Replaces : None
Download Size : 10.73 KiB
Installed Size : 21.00 KiB
Packager : Evangelos Foutras <evangelos@foutrelis.com>
Build Date : Mon Oct 6 20:37:52 2014
Validated By : MD5 Sum SHA256 Sum Signature

The package/module is required by tlp, a power managament tool for ThinkPads.

graysky · 2014-11-13 10:44:47

There's your problem: an external package built against the ARCH kernel is supplying the module. You need to build it against the headers for -ck in order for it to work. Nothing is wrong with the -ck packages.

Last edited by graysky (2014-11-13 10:45:06)

orschiro · 2014-11-14 10:42:16

@graysky

Can I somehow disable acer_wmi since I am running no Acer machine but a Thinkpad?

I am getting the following error on boot:

Nov 14 10:46:26 thinkpad kernel: acer_wmi: No or unsupported WMI interface, unable to load

Tried blacklisting the following modules but the error remains:

~ cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf 
# acer_wmi: No or unsupported WMI interface, unable to load
blacklist wmi
blacklist acer_wmi

Thanks!

WorMzy · 2014-11-14 10:53:45

@orschiro: Add the modconf hook to your mkinitcpio.conf and update your initramfs.

$ mkinitcpio --hookhelp modconf
==> Help for hook 'modconf':
This hook installs modprobe configuration files from /etc/modprobe.d and
/usr/lib/modprobe.d.

orschiro · 2014-11-14 15:28:16

@WorMzy

The modconf hooks is already added to my mkinitcpio.conf:

$ cat /etc/mkinitcpio.conf 
[...]
HOOKS="base udev autodetect modconf block lvm2 resume filesystems keyboard fsck"

WorMzy · 2014-11-14 15:41:54

Have you rebuilt your initramfs since you modified blacklist.conf?

GourdCaptain · 2014-11-15 19:23:58

Can you apply the patch used in the current 3.17.3 official kernel in testing to fix the bugs on Haswell CPUs with the recent microcode update discussed in this thread? https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=188879&p=2

orschiro · 2014-11-15 19:37:21

WorMzy wrote:

Have you rebuilt your initramfs since you modified blacklist.conf?

Yes, but the error still appears. I will test the default kernel and see if the error occurs there as well.

Thanks for your help.

losko · 2014-11-19 09:58:42

Hi,
I don't know if it's a -ck related issue...

$ dmesg | grep microcode
[    0.000000] CPU0 microcode updated early to revision 0xa4, date = 2010-10-02
[    0.216359] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x6fd, pf=0x1, revision=0xa4
[    0.216368] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x6fd, pf=0x1, revision=0xa1
[    0.216426] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba

Core0 gets updated correctly (revision=0xa4), core1 is not updated (revision=0xa1).
I'm using linux-ck-core2 3.17.3-3. Previous versions since microcode update change, were the same.

clfarron4 · 2014-11-19 11:22:49

losko wrote:

Hi,
I don't know if it's a -ck related issue...
$ dmesg | grep microcode
[    0.000000] CPU0 microcode updated early to revision 0xa4, date = 2010-10-02
[    0.216359] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x6fd, pf=0x1, revision=0xa4
[    0.216368] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x6fd, pf=0x1, revision=0xa1
[    0.216426] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
Core0 gets updated correctly (revision=0xa4), core1 is not updated (revision=0xa1).
I'm using linux-ck-core2 3.17.3-3. Previous versions since microcode update change, were the same.

This thread on microcode might help. Does it happen with the [core] kernel.

losko · 2014-11-19 14:06:53

clfarron4 wrote:

Does it happen with the [core] kernel.

I don't have it, I'm using linux-ck everywhere
This problem happens only on one system...

orschiro · 2014-11-19 15:25:47

Can someone confirm issues loading the uvcvideo module required for integrated webcams?

I executed # modprobe uvcvideo but a # lsmod | grep uvcvideo does not return any output.

Arch Linux

#2026 2014-11-12 18:12:40

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2027 2014-11-12 18:44:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2028 2014-11-12 19:30:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2029 2014-11-12 19:32:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2030 2014-11-12 19:36:05

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2031 2014-11-12 19:56:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2032 2014-11-12 19:57:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2033 2014-11-12 19:59:45

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2034 2014-11-12 20:05:02

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2035 2014-11-12 21:10:07

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2036 2014-11-12 21:44:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2037 2014-11-12 23:20:09

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2038 2014-11-12 23:32:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2039 2014-11-13 10:22:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2040 2014-11-13 10:44:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2041 2014-11-14 10:42:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2042 2014-11-14 10:53:45

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2043 2014-11-14 15:28:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2044 2014-11-14 15:41:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2045 2014-11-15 19:23:58

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2046 2014-11-15 19:37:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2047 2014-11-19 09:58:42

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2048 2014-11-19 11:22:49

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2049 2014-11-19 14:06:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2050 2014-11-19 15:25:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer