You are not logged in.
cower depends on curl which depends on openssl. The bits of calls to openssl in cower are a direct result of using curl, so not having an explicit dependency on openssl is not wrong either. Maybe libcurl should provide an api to set mutex allocation and lock callbacks?
cower links directly to libcrypto, therefore it should depend on curl. It doesn't matter why -- the dependency is absolutely there.
Adding locking callbacks to libcurl has been discussed on the mailing list several times. They won't exist until someone is motivated to add them.
Offline
What is the date format for %a (last modified) and %s (submission date)? Am i missing another option to convert the date? Does Sun 13 Apr 2014 02:40:18 PM MDT = 1397421618?
m177er ~ $ cower -i zukitwo-themes
Repository : aur
Name : zukitwo-themes [installed]
Version : 20140413-1
URL : http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Zukitwo?content=140562
AUR Page : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zukitwo-themes
Category : gnome
License : GPL3
Votes : 448
Out of Date : No
Maintainer : OmeGa
Submitted : Fri 27 May 2011 09:24:42 AM MDT
Last Modified : Sun 13 Apr 2014 02:40:18 PM MDT
Description : A theme for GTK3, GTK2, Metacity, xfwm4, Gnome Shell and Unity.
m177er ~ $ cower -i --format %a zukitwo-themes
1397421618
Thanks.
Offline
It looks like the number of seconds, epoch, standard stuff: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_time
Edit:
$ date -d 2014-04-13 +%s
1397340000
$ date -d @1397340000
Sun Apr 13 00:00:00 CEST 2014
$ date -d @$(cower -i --format %a zukitwo-themes)
Sun Apr 13 22:40:18 CEST 2014
Edit 2: Is your cower up to date?
Last edited by karol (2014-04-14 14:59:27)
Offline
Thanks karol.
It looks like the number of seconds, epoch, standard stuff: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_time
Edit:
$ date -d 2014-04-13 +%s 1397340000 $ date -d @1397340000 Sun Apr 13 00:00:00 CEST 2014
$ date -d @$(cower -i --format %a zukitwo-themes) Sun Apr 13 22:40:18 CEST 2014
Edit 2: Is your cower up to date?
Cower is up to date, I just installed it last night. I'll try this when I get home:
$ date -d @$(cower -i --format %a zukitwo-themes)
Edit
--------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for the info. I had just installed cower, was testing the different commands and was wondering if I was missing something when use the date options.
m177er ~ $ sudo pacman -Qm cower
cower 11-3
m177er ~ $ date -d @$(cower -i --format %a zukitwo-themes)
Sun Apr 13 14:40:18 MDT 2014
Last edited by M177ER (2014-04-15 01:09:28)
Offline
First of all thanks for your contribution falconindy.
Unless I miss something, neither the --ignore parameter nor the IgnorePkg variable in config works
~/.config/cower $ cower --debug -uv --ignore z600
debug: ignoring package: z600
debug: found config option: IgnorePkg => dep_build
debug: ignoring package: dep_build
debug: initializing curl
debug: initializing alpm
debug: registering alpm db: core
debug: registering alpm db: extra
debug: registering alpm db: community
debug: registering alpm db: multilib
debug: registering alpm db: aur
:: Checking cower for updates...
:: Checking z600 for updates...
debug: [cower]: curl_easy_perform https://aur.archlinux.org/rpc.php?type=info&arg=cower
:: Checking dep_build for updates...
debug: [z600]: curl_easy_perform https://aur.archlinux.org/rpc.php?type=info&arg=z600
debug: [dep_build]: curl_easy_perform https://aur.archlinux.org/rpc.php?type=info&arg=dep_build
debug: [dep_build]: server responded with 200
debug: [z600]: server responded with 200
debug: [cower]: server responded with 200
debug: releasing curl
debug: releasing alpm
Offline
I'm not sure what you mean, alphe.
I have moc-svn in IgnorePkg.
$ cower -uv --ignore rxvt-unicode-multi_display-256xresources
<snip>
:: Checking penguin-command for updates...
warning: moc-svn [ignored] 2526-1 -> 2536-1
:: Checking rmlint-git for updates...
<snip>
warning: rxvt-unicode-multi_display-256xresources [ignored] 9.19-1 -> 9.20-1
:: Checking weatherman for updates...
<snip>
Offline
I assumed that with ignore* cower will ignore this package at all.
From your example I understand that does not update these packages. Just like pacman.
I have a few local packages. Some of them exist in aur but I have modified them so I do want these packages to be handled by cower.
Either way it is (almost) the same.
Thanks karol.
Offline
If you don't want the warning in the output, you have to use the '-q' switch
$ cower -uq --ignore rxvt-unicode-multi_display-256xresources
$
as just dropping '-v' is not enough:
$ cower -u --ignore rxvt-unicode-multi_display-256xresources
warning: moc-svn [ignored] 2526-1 -> 2536-1
warning: rxvt-unicode-multi_display-256xresources [ignored] 9.19-1 -> 9.20-1
Nothing gets updated either way.
Offline
Is it possible to list every package from AUR? I want to grep the output to find every package in specified category.
Offline
Is it possible to search exact name?
Offline
IIRC, pacman used to print package description at the bottom, but now it's near the top:
$ pacman -Si firefox
Repository : extra
Name : firefox
Version : 30.0-1
Description : Standalone web browser from mozilla.org
<snip>
Do you want to keep the package descriptions at the bottom in cower?
$ cower -i wine-wow64-git
Repository : aur
Name : wine-wow64-git
Version : 20120216-1
<snip>
Description : A compatibility layer for running Windows programs (both 32-bit and 64-bit; from git)
Offline
Any plans to update for libalpm.so.9?
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
Any plans to update for libalpm.so.9?
Not sure what you mean, but cower-git works with pacman 4.2:
$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libalpm.so.9
/usr/lib/libalpm.so.9 is owned by pacman 4.2.0-2
$ cower --version
12
\
\
,__, | |
(oo)\| |___
(__)\| | )\_
U | |_w | \
| | || *
Cower....
Offline
Maybe is talking about take adventage of new features only present in the new pacman?
Well, I suppose that this is somekind of signature, no?
Offline
ngoonee wrote:Any plans to update for libalpm.so.9?
Not sure what you mean, but cower-git works with pacman 4.2:
$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libalpm.so.9 /usr/lib/libalpm.so.9 is owned by pacman 4.2.0-2 $ cower --version 12 \ \ ,__, | | (oo)\| |___ (__)\| | )\_ U | |_w | \ | | || * Cower....
I meant a new release of cower, sorry for being unclear
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
I was trying to isntall cower and encountered the following error:
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
cower-12.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 1EB2638FF56C0C53)
==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
And I got around it following the steps described in https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=152337. It did work, though as that post is already more than 2 years old, I was wondering if this was the best way to solve the issue or if there's a better way?
Offline
Offline
Thanks for the info. Still, it looks to me that the fix I posted above pointed makepkg to pacman's signed keys, instead of individually signing the key of that specific package.
Offline
Trying to build cower got this error message:
==> Iniciando build()…
cc -pthread -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro cower.o aur.o package.o -lcurl -lalpm -lyajl -larchive -lcrypto -o cower
collect2: error: ld devolvió el estado de salida 1
make: *** [<integrado>: cower] Error 1
==> ERROR: Se produjo un fallo en build().
I have no idea how to solve it. Anyone does?
[SOLVED] it was the stupidest mistake. I'd ran out of space on my /tmp partition.
Last edited by jmontano (2016-07-12 16:12:26)
Offline
Offline
a question on this beautiful tools : is it possible to deal with github (API) account with the --domain option?
Offline