Arch Linux

WiLLiE

Member

From: Sweden

Registered: 2005-02-27

Posts: 135

pyKDE & SIP broken?

I installed Amarok earlier today, and everything went smooth.
Then I found this python script for Amarok I wanted to try.

Requirements: pyQT & pyKDE
So I went along and installed them. (via pacman)

Now, when I try to activate the script in Amarok it says I dont have pyKDE installed.
Runnig the script manually outputs:

> python  desktop.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/home/willie/.kde/share/apps/amarok/scripts/desktop/desktop.py", line 37, in ?
       from kdecore import *
RuntimeError: the sip module supports API v1.0 to v1.0 but the kdecore module requires API v0.2

I'm running Gnome, and installed Amarok with its dependencies via pacman. (I don't have the fullblown KDE pack installed)

Help please?

WiLLiE

Member

From: Sweden

Registered: 2005-02-27

Posts: 135

Re: pyKDE & SIP broken?

no one?

allanon

Member

From: Enschede, The Netherlands

Registered: 2004-02-10

Posts: 52

Re: pyKDE & SIP broken?

I had desktop.py running fine, but a week or two ago something broke it/pykde, and I get the same message. Just searched here for a fix now, so sorry, have no solution either.

IceRAM

Member

From: Bucharest, Romania

Registered: 2004-03-04

Posts: 772

Website

Re: pyKDE & SIP broken?

It might be a KDE bug. Check latest CVS Digest for changes in pyKDE.

(I'm not sure this this the problem though)

---

:: / my web presence

Shofs

Member

From: Central Illinois

Registered: 2004-12-15

Posts: 184

Re: pyKDE & SIP broken?

I am getting a "Missing pyQt error currently.

Any fixes for this?

---

Last.FM

Shofs

Member

From: Central Illinois

Registered: 2004-12-15

Posts: 184

Re: pyKDE & SIP broken?

Bump

---

Last.FM

Lone_Wolf

Administrator

From: Netherlands, Europe

Registered: 2005-10-04

Posts: 13,146

Re: pyKDE & SIP broken?

what does

pacman -Qi pyqt

output ?

---

Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky