You are not logged in.
Hi,
When I go to some pages (for example github), I see those pages with ugly fonts in firefox while with good fonts in Chromium. I have the defaults settings.
Can you look at this and see what I say (zoom it).
Any hints?
Thanks in advance,
Last edited by xanb (2015-03-11 14:45:19)
Owning one OpenRC (artoo way) and other three systemd machines
Offline
That's as meaningful as "Nvidia gives me good graphics, AMD doesn't". Please provide some detail: GPU+drivers, recent updates, desktop environment or lack thereof, font settings and packages, DPI and monitor, wiki articles you have followed, and so on.
Last edited by Alad (2015-03-11 12:52:10)
Mods are just community members who have the occasionally necessary option to move threads around and edit posts. -- Trilby
Offline
There are a number of threads on the forums dealing with firefox, github, and fonts. Just search for those three terms.
Offline
I found it here the same problem. The solution disable bitmap fonts:
$ sudo ln -s /etc/fonts/conf.avail/70-no-bitmaps.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/
Why this section is removed in new versions of Firefox Wiki page?
Owning one OpenRC (artoo way) and other three systemd machines
Offline
Why this section is removed in new versions of Firefox Wiki page?
Offline
The changelog says that Firefox instructions are put in Fonts Page. But in the Fonts page there is no tricky for the Firefox. Perhaps in the "Disable bitmap fonts" section we should refer to Firefox problems, don't we?
Owning one OpenRC (artoo way) and other three systemd machines
Offline
You could add a sentence to the Firefox article linking to Font configuration.
It would be better though if that sentence would include an actual reason why Firefox struggles with bitmap fonts, compared to Chrome (40+?) - "It can happen that" is not really statisfactory.
Mods are just community members who have the occasionally necessary option to move threads around and edit posts. -- Trilby
Offline
You could add a sentence to the Firefox article linking to Font configuration.
It would be better though if that sentence would include an actual reason why Firefox struggles with bitmap fonts, compared to Chrome (40+?) - "It can happen that" is not really statisfactory.
Better if you do. Perhaps you know the reasons of bad behaviour of Firefox. I don't
Owning one OpenRC (artoo way) and other three systemd machines
Offline
I'm not sure I understand. Are you sure it's a firefox-exclusive issue? If not, it belongs to a fonts article.
D you want to post a hint in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fi … eaks#Fonts with a link directly to
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fo … tmap_fonts ?
Offline
Done: firefox tricks...
Owning one OpenRC (artoo way) and other three systemd machines
Offline
ugly fonts in firefox while with good fonts in Chromium. I have the defaults settings.
It's chrome that is naughty.
Do your eyes a favour - install Infinality's rendering via bohoomil's packages
And yes, bitmap fonts should be *disabled*, e.g. in the fontconfig rules:
<!-- Prevent Gnome from using embedded bitmaps in fonts like Calibri -->
<match target="font">
<edit name="embeddedbitmap" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
</match>
<!-- Reject bitmap fonts in favour of Truetype, Postscript, etc. -->
<selectfont><rejectfont><pattern>
<patelt name="scalable"><bool>false</bool></patelt>
</pattern></rejectfont></selectfont>
<!-- Substitute truetype fonts for bitmap ones -->
<match target="font">
<edit name="prefer_outline"><bool>true</bool></edit>
</match>
Offline
xanb wrote:ugly fonts in firefox while with good fonts in Chromium. I have the defaults settings.
It's chrome that is naughty.
See, that's what I meant with reasoning. You'd rather include a note in the Chromium article explaining why the browser won't behave WRT fonts.
Last edited by Alad (2015-03-13 15:42:34)
Mods are just community members who have the occasionally necessary option to move threads around and edit posts. -- Trilby
Offline