unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2015-05-04 07:11:40

Miblo wrote:

Is this with the most recent patch? I'm on UEFI here and having no problems at all. graysky's linux-ck-4.0.1-3 is still going strong.

I am glad to hear that 4.0.1-3 is working. This helps to narrow down the possible causes. In what I hope to be the final attempt, can you guys please try one more build and look for panics? Take a guess, 4.0.1-4

Option 1 (roll your own):

http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-4.0.1-4.src.tar.gz

Option 2 (my builds):

pacman -U http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-4.0.1-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

and optional headers

pacman -U http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-headers-4.0.1-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

Last edited by graysky (2015-05-04 07:11:56)

mauritiusdadd · 2015-05-04 07:59:33

graysky wrote:

I am glad to hear that 4.0.1-3 is working. This helps to narrow down the possible causes. In what I hope to be the final attempt, can you guys please try one more build and look for panics? Take a guess, 4.0.1-4

I can confirm that 4.0.1-3 works (I let the system run for about 12h without any problem). 4.0.1-4 seems to work too.

friendofarch · 2015-05-04 09:38:29

runical wrote:

yochaigal wrote:
Everything is working great, but went to do pacman -Syu today and got:
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: linux-ck-sandybridge: local (4.0-1) is newer than repo-ck (3.19.6-1)
warning: linux-ck-sandybridge-headers: local (4.0-1) is newer than repo-ck (3.19.6-1)
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: acpi_call-ck: requires linux-ck>=4.0
Running 64bit Arch with 4.0.0-1-ck kernel on a Lenovo X1 Carbon (sandybridge).
Graysky mentioned earlier that he would downgrade the packages because of the crashes. If you get crashes, you can downgrade using pacman -Syyuu.

I have the same situation here, but pacman -Syyuu doesn't change a thing! I just get the same feedback as with pacman -Syu!

graysky · 2015-05-04 09:50:57

You can downgrade by just installing the group name or package name you wish to have and paceman will pull down the 3.19.x series for you.

graysky · 2015-05-04 09:53:53

mauritiusdadd wrote:

graysky wrote:
I am glad to hear that 4.0.1-3 is working. This helps to narrow down the possible causes. In what I hope to be the final attempt, can you guys please try one more build and look for panics? Take a guess, 4.0.1-4
I can confirm that 4.0.1-3 works (I let the system run for about 12h without any problem). 4.0.1-4 seems to work too.

4.0.1-3 uses ck1 and Alfred's patch and has NUMA enabled.
4.0.1-4 uses ck1 and has NUMA enabled but is otherwise unmodified.

I'd like to hear from other users who have experienced panics if 4.0.1-4 solves it for them. This is much cleaner since no extra patches are applied.

Last edited by graysky (2015-05-04 09:55:31)

Buddlespit · 2015-05-04 11:11:50

OK, my promised morning report. No dmesg errors, no journal error messages concerning the kernel or nvidia driver, no panics and no lock ups or freezes. It hasn't been quite 24hrs, but I think I'm good with the patch.

edit: this is 4.0.1-3-ck. gonna test -4 now
edit2: installed 4.0.1-4-ck kernel and headers, removed and re-installed purpose-built nvidia-ck for kernel 4.0, rebuilt kernel image (mkinitcpio) and nvidia says it has a problem with the symbols (per journal). Tried removing, re-installing nvidia-ck 2 times (from cli, no gui because nvidia doesn't want to play well). Ended up downgrading to 4.0.1-3-ck, removing and re-installing nvidia-ck and rebuilding the image. System now works. I have to go to work today, so I'll look deeper into this once I get home.
journalctl error:

May 04 07:27:27 PatsMain kernel: nvidia: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout

Last edited by Buddlespit (2015-05-04 11:47:16)

friendofarch · 2015-05-04 12:09:31

graysky wrote:

You can downgrade by just installing the group name or package name you wish to have and paceman will pull down the 3.19.x series for you.

friendofarch ~ # pacman -S linux-ck
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
:: linux-ck and linux-ck-sandybridge are in conflict. Remove linux-ck-sandybridge? [y/N] y
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: bbswitch-ck: requires linux-ck>=4.0
:: linux-ck-sandybridge-headers: requires linux-ck-sandybridge
:: nvidia-ck-sandybridge: requires linux-ck-sandybridge>=4.0
:: nvidia-ck-sandybridge: requires linux-ck-sandybridge<4.1

friendofarch ~ # pacman -S nvidia-ck
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
:: nvidia-ck and nvidia-ck-sandybridge are in conflict. Remove nvidia-ck-sandybridge? [y/N] y
:: linux-ck and linux-ck-sandybridge are in conflict. Remove linux-ck-sandybridge? [y/N] y
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: bbswitch-ck: requires linux-ck>=4.0
:: linux-ck-sandybridge-headers: requires linux-ck-sandybridge

Either not as simple as that or I don't understand how to do it;)

Maybe I rather wait until ck-repo gets updated, since Kernel 4.0 runs mostly fine (except for some flickering on login-screen). All the other updates will have to wait then...

Thanks anyway!

Xabre · 2015-05-04 12:25:58

pacman -S linux-ck bbswitch-ck linux-ck-headers nvidia-ck

all at once, and don't mix sandybridge with generic packages.

Buddlespit · 2015-05-04 12:27:29

friendofarch wrote:

graysky wrote:
You can downgrade by just installing the group name or package name you wish to have and paceman will pull down the 3.19.x series for you.
Either not as simple as that or I don't understand how to do it;)
Maybe I rather wait until ck-repo gets updated, since Kernel 4.0 runs mostly fine (except for some flickering on login-screen). All the other updates will have to wait then...
Thanks anyway!

sudo pacman -S linux-ck nvidia-ck bbswitch-ck

Keep adding onto that line until you have no more errors

Miblo · 2015-05-04 13:07:30

graysky wrote:

Option 2 (my builds):

pacman -U http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-4.0.1-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

4.0.1-3 ran calmly for 17½ hours and linux-ck-4.0.1-4 has booted up, shutdown and is now currently running without issue. This is with BFQ, incidentally.

For full disclosure, although my panic with linux-ck-haswell 4.0-1 went away for a while, it (or a different panic) came back after wpa_supplicant 1:2.3-1 arrived, so I'd been back on linux-ck-haswell 3.19.6-1 until yesterday.

eaufavor · 2015-05-04 18:32:30

i7-3770, Radeon HD 7570
linux-ck-4.0.1-4 just booted up. BFQ enabled. No more crashes.

graysky · 2015-05-04 18:43:08

eaufavor wrote:

i7-3770, Radeon HD 7570
linux-ck-4.0.1-4 just booted up. BFQ enabled. No more crashes.

This is good to hear. Can some others who have experienced panics in the past please try 4.0.1-4 from here and report back:

graysky wrote:

Option 1 (roll your own):

http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-4.0.1-4.src.tar.gz

Option 2 (my builds):

pacman -U http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-4.0.1-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
pacman -U http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-headers-4.0.1-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

inglor · 2015-05-04 22:30:26

Just tried 4.0.1-4 (binaries) and boot normally - no kernel panic! hooray!

paneless · 2015-05-04 22:56:04

+1) 4.0.1-4 with BFQ enabled working fine here with AthlonII.

Last edited by paneless (2015-05-05 13:30:27)

Buddlespit · 2015-05-05 02:06:39

Tried the 4.0.1-4 binaries posted. Still having nvidia issues, won't start SDDM. See my above post, #2331. I can log into tty2, tho.

Scimmia · 2015-05-05 02:11:23

Buddlespit wrote:

Tried the 4.0.1-4 binaries posted. Still having nvidia issues, won't start SDDM. See my above post, #2331. I can log into tty2, tho.

That error just means that nvidia needs built against the new kernel. Since graysky isn't providing nvidia packages for the testing kernels, that's on you.

Buddlespit · 2015-05-05 02:49:26

Scimmia wrote:

Buddlespit wrote:
Tried the 4.0.1-4 binaries posted. Still having nvidia issues, won't start SDDM. See my above post, #2331. I can log into tty2, tho.
That error just means that nvidia needs built against the new kernel. Since graysky isn't providing nvidia packages for the testing kernels, that's on you.

I concur.
Unfortunately, unless I'm doing something horribly wrong, it's not working. I can install a purpose built nvidia-ck on 4.0.1-3-ck, but not on 4.0.1-4-ck. Or, I can build and install it, but it's just not working. Not really an issue, tbh. I can continue to run 4.0.1-3-ck until regular ck packages resume. Just to be clear, I boot into 4.0.1-4-ck, switch to tty2 (I'm on Plasma 5, SDDM has tty1), go to my build dir and makepkg -csi on a nvidia-ck 349.16-2 PKBUILD released when 4.0-ck first came out, then mkinitcpio -p linux-ck, then reboot and stare at tty1 for about a minute before deciding to switch to tty2 and back to 4.0.1-3.

graysky · 2015-05-05 04:37:46

OK gang, CK does not believe that simply disabling NUMA would affect this issue despite several of you running 4.0.1-4 without panics. I trust his opinion CK has released a new patch[1] which he would like those of you who have experienced a panic to test and to provide feedback.

As such, I have incorporated this patch into 4.0.1-5 and have re-disabled NUMA as I have done for linux-ck for over the past 3 years. Please test 4.0.1-5.

Option 1 (roll your own):

http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-4.0.1-5.src.tar.gz

Option 2 (my builds):

pacman -U http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-4.0.1-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

and optional headers

pacman -U http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-headers-4.0.1-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

1. http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2015/04/bfs … 5033665328

mauritiusdadd · 2015-05-05 05:23:59

Well, 4.0.1-5 does not work, regardless of the IO scheduler used (bfq, deadline, etc.). Just installed and already got several kernel panics.

Last edited by mauritiusdadd (2015-05-05 05:25:06)

paneless · 2015-05-05 13:29:50

Installed 4.0.1.5 this morning, booted three times without issue. Fourth boot gave kernel panic, switched off and on again and rebooted five or six times without problem. BFQ enabled throughout.

Miblo · 2015-05-05 13:32:33

graysky wrote:

Option 2 (my builds):

pacman -U http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/testing/linux-ck-4.0.1-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

Hmm… different experience from mauritiusdadd here:

Reboot out of linux-ck-4.0.1-4 (successfully, like normal)
Boot linux-ck-4.0.1-5 successfully, with BFQ
Poweroff to panic!
Boot successfully, with BFQ
Poweroff successfully
Boot successfully, with BFQ
- Still live…

That first panic must be undesirable behaviour, mustn't it, but it seems to have settled down now. Any tips for stressing the system / anything in particular that'd be useful to test?

eaufavor · 2015-05-05 14:42:19

linux-ck-4.0.1-5 (binary) boot panic!

eaufavor wrote:

i7-3770, Radeon HD 7570
linux-ck-4.0.1-4 just booted up. BFQ enabled. No more crashes.

mauritiusdadd · 2015-05-05 16:48:11

Just for the record, I used ABS to download the PKGBUILD for the current stock kernel and rebuilt it disabling NUMA as in linux-ck. I rebooted several times without having any problem and the system is still running... so the problem is definitely NUMA=off + BFS.

Last edited by mauritiusdadd (2015-05-05 16:49:31)

inglor · 2015-05-05 19:13:22

My experiences are like Miblo with 4.0.1-5-ck (binaries):
- Boot success with 4.0.1-5-ck
- Power-off is a panic
- Boot on panic, hard reboot
- Boot on panic, hard reboot
Keeps doing that.

BFQ enabled on all tests, nouveau drivers.

So it's definitely not stable.

graysky · 2015-05-05 19:19:16

@all - Thanks for the testing of 4.0.1-5-ck. I will update ck's blogs with your results and reference this thread. Let's see what CK thinks.

Arch Linux

#2326 2015-05-04 07:11:40

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2327 2015-05-04 07:59:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2328 2015-05-04 09:38:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2329 2015-05-04 09:50:57

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2330 2015-05-04 09:53:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2331 2015-05-04 11:11:50

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2332 2015-05-04 12:09:31

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2333 2015-05-04 12:25:58

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2334 2015-05-04 12:27:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2335 2015-05-04 13:07:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2336 2015-05-04 18:32:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2337 2015-05-04 18:43:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2338 2015-05-04 22:30:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2339 2015-05-04 22:56:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2340 2015-05-05 02:06:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2341 2015-05-05 02:11:23

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2342 2015-05-05 02:49:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2343 2015-05-05 04:37:46

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2344 2015-05-05 05:23:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2345 2015-05-05 13:29:50

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2346 2015-05-05 13:32:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2347 2015-05-05 14:42:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2348 2015-05-05 16:48:11

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2349 2015-05-05 19:13:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2350 2015-05-05 19:19:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer