You are not logged in.
I would like to see which popular packages haven’t made it into AUR4 yet.
Last edited by Markus00000 (2015-08-11 13:10:59)
Offline
Not sure if comments or votes from aur3 have been preserved for the packages that haven't been migrated.
Any reason why you haven't done it a week ago?
Offline
Lack of foresight. I had the idea only after the switch.
(Thanks for posting 25.000 times. Your posts were helpful time after time.)
Offline
Thanks for posting 25.000 times. Your posts were helpful time after time.
Oh, wow. Thanks!
There's https://web.archive.org/web/20140908024 … ckages.php but it's from a year ago.
Offline
There's https://web.archive.org/web/20140908024 … ckages.php but it's from a year ago.
Great idea, that’s a start. Thanks.
Offline
Here’s roughly what I did:
Get a list of all 72335 AUR4 packages. (Seems like the mirror is slightly out of date but that shouldn’t have much of an effect.)
Get a list of all 6774 AUR3 packages with 15 or more votes. (Retrieved from archive.org so the data is not perfect as the snapshots are scattered over time and obviously from the past.)
Remove all AUR4 packages from the AUR3 list.
Search for all remaining packages in the current AUR4 and remove those found. (As mentioned above the mirror is slightly out of date, so checking the live AUR4 removed some more.)
Look up the votes for the remaining packages.
And if I didn’t make any mistakes, these are the most popular AUR3 packages missing from AUR4:
234 backintime-gtk
234 backintime-gnome
219 android-ndk64
219 android-ndk32
182 padevchooser
171 bin32-wine-snapshot
170 tintwizard-svn
170 gtk-theme-shiki-colors
169 fbsplash-themes-arch-banner
164 foo2zjs
164 avant-window-navigator-bzr
163 tupac
157 fbsplash-theme-arch-black-extras
84 kernel-netbook-headers
55 systemd-git-sysvcompat
55 libsystemd-git
46 arm-linux-gnueabi-binutils-ldscripts
31 transmission-qt-svn
31 transmission-gtk-svn
28 opentk-docs
26 maltego-doc
23 zeroc-ice-python2
23 zeroc-ice-python
I expected a longer list. If anyone feels like checking this result or looking at packages with fewer than 15 votes, that would be great.
Offline
If you need a PKGBUILD for foo and it's not in the repos, not in the AUR, not in the mirror of the old AUR, then read the wiki and try creating one yourself or as for help on the forum.
What do you need the list of packages that used to be popular for?
Offline
Who cares what used to be popular? I used to be popular in high school. That's not geting me any dates now.
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
What do you need the list of packages that used to be popular for?
I wanted to know how complete the transition to AUR4 was and whether any popular packages were left behind.
Who cares what used to be popular? I used to be popular in high school. That's not geting me any dates now.
Most packages that were popular in AUR3 are still going to be popular today. I didn’t care about the popularity in particular, I was curious about the AUR4 transition of popular AUR3 packages.
Offline
The number of votes a package had at the time of migration is not an accurate measure of how popular it is. Votes do not expire (except possibly when dead accounts are purged from the AUR), so the majority of the votes could be from 2011, when $package received a lot of attention.
If it's not been transferred over to AUR4, then it's clearly not popular enough for someone to step up and maintain it.
Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD
Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.
Online
Popularity metric in AUR4 works in a different manner, so it may be interesting to see how it changes in the coming year i.e. top 100 popular packages now v. top 100 popular packages in mid-2016.
Offline