You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1 2016-01-14 15:31:10
- SmallAndSimple
- Member
- Registered: 2015-11-25
- Posts: 50
OpenOCD 0.9 seems less stable then openOCD 0.7
For some debugging I am using openOCD. I experimented with this tool before and in my experience version 0.7 is currently the best and most stable version. The combination openOCD 0.9 and arm-none-eabi-gdb leads to all sorts of segfaults, disconnected devices and other issues. None of these issues happen with OpenOCD 0.7. But the Arch Repo's are on 0.9, is this a deliberate choice? Or was the choice more like: newer is better? And can I get the 0.7 package from somewhere (maybe the AUR? I cant find it).
Offline
#2 2016-01-14 17:37:48
- Lone_Wolf
- Member
- From: Netherlands, Europe
- Registered: 2005-10-04
- Posts: 11,919
Re: OpenOCD 0.9 seems less stable then openOCD 0.7
But the Arch Repo's are on 0.9, is this a deliberate choice? Or was the choice more like: newer is better?
Arch devs tend to focus on providing the latest stable version,for openOCD that appears to be 0.9.0 .
You can find the final 0.7.0-3 PKGBUILD for OpenOCD here
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
(A works at time B) && (time C > time B ) ≠ (A works at time C)
Offline