You are not logged in.

#26 2006-04-27 15:55:33

hypermegachi
Member
Registered: 2004-07-25
Posts: 311

Re: why is there only one kernel by default?

marmotte wrote:

If you are afraid of kernel update, you can add in /etc/pacman.conf

NoUpgrade=/boot/vmlinuz26

So that it will create a /boot/vmlinuz26.pacnew next time you update your kernel smile

interesting big_smile
what happens if a vmlinuz26.pacnew already exists?  does the pacnew get overwritten?

Offline

#27 2006-04-27 16:10:22

sebcactus
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2005-01-27
Posts: 277

Re: why is there only one kernel by default?

mmm probably. But I am not sure though.
One hold kernel is enough I think.

The vmlinuz26.pacnew is the new kernel by the way. The old one is still vmlinuz26

Offline

#28 2006-04-27 23:04:44

iphitus
Forum Fellow
From: Melbourne, Australia
Registered: 2004-10-09
Posts: 4,927

Re: why is there only one kernel by default?

tomk wrote:

The log does not record post-install messages.

always assumed it did sad

Offline

#29 2006-04-28 00:19:59

codemac
Member
From: Cliche Tech Place
Registered: 2005-05-13
Posts: 794
Website

Re: why is there only one kernel by default?

or you could always just do

pacman -Syu

then type n.  This is so you know what's updating.

yes | pacman -Syu > upgrage.log

and you can run

tail -F upgrade.log

in another term to follow the upgrade's process.  Then review upgrade.log to your liking.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB