You are not logged in.
So, I'm messing around with some code and at some point started to play with assembly.
I read that you can include
.intel_syntax noprefix
in your code to make AS understand the 'proper'(*ducks*) x86 syntax.
For reference, you can also have gcc output assembly in 'intel' syntax with "-masm=intel", which generates output that can ne assembled with as.
However I can't get this to work properly on more generic examples
It seems to not understand ';' comments, among other things..
Is there anything that I'm just missing, or is this 'support' for the intel_syntax just very flakey?
EDIT:
To be a little more precise:
Is the '.intel' directive meant to enable me to use the gnu assembler to assemble files written in 'intel syntax',
in essence making it a drop-in replacement for nasm? (Disregarding other features/differences)??
Last edited by hungerfish (2016-03-10 11:12:53)
Beetles and bacteria are vastly more successful than humans in terms of survival.
Offline