Arch Linux

wain

Member

From: France

Registered: 2005-05-01

Posts: 289

Website

Re: Fedora Core vs. Arch Linux (not a flame war...)

Kdelibs are noted in the following paragraph (where I suggest GnomeBaker or Graveman as GTK based alternative to K3B).

You're right. This is why I use graveman since already a long time.  8)

---

s/pacman/yaourt/g
http://archlinux.fr/

JGC

Developer

Registered: 2003-12-03

Posts: 1,664

Re: Fedora Core vs. Arch Linux (not a flame war...)

nerolinux vs. k3b:
http://www.flexbeta.net/main/articles.p … &pagenum=1

you might change your mind of preferring nero to k3b after reading that comparison.

K3B depends on cdparanoia, cdrdao, cdrtools, ffmpeg, flac, hal, id3lib, kdelibs :twisted:, libid3tag,libmpcdec,libsamplerate, musicbrainz, normalize, readline, sox, taglib, xvidcore

Nero just depends on gtk  :!: 

I'd rather have K3B and a ton of KDE libs on my gnome system than use nero. I used nero a lot on the windows platform, when I switched to linux, I only used cdrecord, cdrdao and burncd from commandline, which worked fine for me always. X-CDRoast was a shitty application that never worked good for me, so I used commandline tools. After a while I saw K3B and was amazed. This single application, just like Amarok, is the main reason to have kde libraries on your system