unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Jristz · 2016-05-11 07:57:30

graysky wrote:

@jristz - Perhaps /var/lib/pacman/sync/repo-ck.db has become corrupt. Do this:
1) Comment the repo-ck lines out in /etc/pacman.conf
2) Run `pacman -Syy`
3) Run `pacman -Sc` and answer 'n' to the first question and 'y' to the 2nd question
4) Uncomment the repo-ck lines from 1
5) Repeat 2
Should be fine.

well, that remove the message, but I cant connect to the website, not pacman, not browser.
I will wait a little longer to see if the problem persist but for now I will let it go (I really pick a dictionary up sometimes).

graysky · 2016-05-11 08:32:39

It will delete the current db and download a fresh copy. If you cannot reach the website that is a different error message. It is up for me btw.

Inan · 2016-06-08 07:18:30

CK just release a new patch. You are doing a great job both of you !

Thank you sincerely <3

graysky · 2016-06-08 11:04:37

Thanks, I am on the RSS feed for CK's blog. We still need to wait for Paolo to release a BFQ for 4.6: http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/d … ources.php

kogone · 2016-06-12 03:53:19

warning: linux-ck-4.5.7-1 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...

Packages (1) linux-ck-4.5.7-1

Total Installed Size:   28.94 MiB
Net Upgrade Size:      -50.18 MiB

trimmed a little fat with custom config file

thanks for all your work ck & graysky!

Last edited by kogone (2016-06-12 03:53:49)

keepitsimpleengineer · 2016-06-13 17:36:23

Oops... .. .

error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-ck-sandybridge: installing nvidia-utils (367.18-1) breaks dependency 'nvidia-utils=364.19'

graysky · 2016-06-13 17:38:30

@keepit - It would appear nvidia-ck is out-of-date. In the future, please flag it in the AUR (instant email).

keepitsimpleengineer · 2016-06-13 18:35:26

graysky wrote:

@keepit - It would appear nvidia-ck is out-of-date. In the future, please flag it in the AUR (instant email).

Go it... .. !

Thanks

Inan · 2016-06-14 00:03:26

I just received a message from Paolo on its progress.

Paolo Valente wrote:

Final testing in progress ... Hope to not find problems ...

EDIT :

And... https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic … eUuq4jtZ84

Yay \o/

Last edited by Inan (2016-06-14 20:37:26)

nomorewindows · 2016-06-27 00:57:55

graysky wrote:

@jristz - Perhaps /var/lib/pacman/sync/repo-ck.db has become corrupt. Do this:
1) Comment the repo-ck lines out in /etc/pacman.conf
2) Run `pacman -Syy`
3) Run `pacman -Sc` and answer 'n' to the first question and 'y' to the 2nd question
4) Uncomment the repo-ck lines from 1
5) Repeat 2
Should be fine.

Tried having problems with the graysky signature on linux-ck-kx even after these steps.

graysky · 2016-06-27 05:26:46

@nomorewindows - Do you have my key properly imported? Post the output of your pacman step that's failing.

nomorewindows · 2016-06-27 17:14:44

graysky wrote:

@nomorewindows - Do you have my key properly imported? Post the output of your pacman step that's failing.

error: linux-ck-kx: signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky@archlinux.us>" is invalid.
::File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).  
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n]

I've also run pacman-key --refresh-keys, but yours is not changed.

Last edited by nomorewindows (2016-06-28 21:23:36)

Gregoire · 2016-06-28 20:49:25

Are you able to suspend to ram with 4.6.3-1-ck (I use Ivybridge with the included intel gfx, no other gfx cards) ?
For me it leave at least the CPU's fans active and I can't resume.

GourdCaptain · 2016-06-28 20:51:16

Gregoire wrote:

Are you able to suspend to ram with 4.6.3-1-ck (I use Ivybridge with the included intel gfx, no other gfx cards) ?
For me it leave at least the CPU's fans active and I can't resume.

It's working for me on my systems, but I had a similar issue on 4.5.x on my systems.

EDIT: For reference, my systems are Broadwell and Skylake architectures. Both had problems on 4.5.X-ck, but not on 4.5.X-ARCH, and both work fine on 4.6.X-ck and ARCH.

Last edited by GourdCaptain (2016-06-28 21:16:44)

ooo · 2016-06-28 21:01:01

suspending works for me on 4.6.3-1-ck on nehalem.
did you test if you have the same issue with 4.6.3-1-ARCH?

Gregoire · 2016-06-28 21:18:47

I didn't test 4.6.3-1-ARCH but I will tomorrow : thank for the hint !

Gregoire · 2016-06-29 13:04:36

Under 4.6.3-1-ARCH I can suspend and resume without any trouble.

graysky · 2016-06-29 13:50:13

@Gregoire - Recommend reporting to CK's blog if you believe the bug is unique to his patchset.

nomorewindows · 2016-07-02 12:41:24

It seems to be that linux-ck-kx is the only package that it has trouble with the signature. It is the only one that pacman is asking whether I want to delete it or not. linux-ck-kx-headers and nvidia-304xx-ck-kx don't complain about the signature, but ofc won't install without linux-ck-kx.

graysky · 2016-07-02 12:46:54

Hmmm... delete the package and redownload?

% pacman-key -v linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig                               :(
==> Checking linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig...
gpg: assuming signed data in 'linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz'
gpg: Signature made Sat 25 Jun 2016 04:29:14 PM EDT using RSA key ID 88A032865EE46C4C
gpg: Note: trustdb not writable
gpg: Good signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky AT archlinux DOT us>" [full]
gpg:                 aka "[jpeg image of size 5969]" [full]

Last edited by graysky (2016-07-02 12:47:21)

nomorewindows · 2016-07-02 13:07:35

graysky wrote:

Hmmm... delete the package and redownload?

% pacman-key -v linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig                               :(
==> Checking linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig...
gpg: assuming signed data in 'linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz'
gpg: Signature made Sat 25 Jun 2016 04:29:14 PM EDT using RSA key ID 88A032865EE46C4C
gpg: Note: trustdb not writable
gpg: Good signature from "graysky (used to sign repo-ck packages) <graysky AT archlinux DOT us>" [full]
gpg:                 aka "[jpeg image of size 5969]" [full]

Ofc I don't have the sig file, but when I do pacman -S(y)u I get the error. I have deleted the file and redownloaded. And then when I use pacman -U linux-ck-kx linux-ck-kx-headers nvidia-304xx-ck-kx then the kernel image gets errors, but my dkms (regardless of linux-ck) keeps giving me errors on

error: /usr/bin/dkms: line xxxx: echo: write error: Broken pipe

Dkms is not the reason why I'm getting kernel build errors though:
The first image:

ERROR: module not found: `crc-itu-t'

The fallback image:

ERROR: module not found `lz4_compress'
ERROR: module not found `libceph'
ERROR: module not found `lru_cache'
ERROR: module not found `libcrc32c'
ERROR: module not found `crc-itu-t'
ERROR: module not found `crc-itu-t'
ERROR: module not found `crc7'
ERROR: module not found `snd'
ERROR: module not found `snd-rawmidi'

Then when it gets down to nvidia:

cat: /usr/lib/modules/extramodules-4.6-ck/version: No such file or directory
depmod: ERROR: could not open directory /lib/modules/4.5.7-1-ck: No such file or directory
depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory
error: command failed to execute correctly

Wait...4.5.7-1-ck?

graysky · 2016-07-02 19:31:40

@nomorewindows - Download the image and install manually (to avoid any sig checking). Ie:

wget http://repo-ck.com/x86_64/linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
pacman -U linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz

Dunno what to tell you about your dkms stuff; personally, I never liked dkms... are you certain that your system is updated and using an updated mirror?

nomorewindows · 2016-07-02 20:05:12

graysky wrote:

@nomorewindows - Download the image and install manually (to avoid any sig checking). Ie:
wget http://repo-ck.com/x86_64/linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
pacman -U linux-ck-kx-4.6.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
Dunno what to tell you about your dkms stuff; personally, I never liked dkms... are you certain that your system is updated and using an updated mirror?

Not sure what's going on here. Redownloaded linux-ck-kx, but still no dice, all modules can't be found to make the initramfs image. Reinstalled dkms, now messages about:

No kernel 4.5.7-1-ck headers.  You must install them to use DKMS!

followed by

No kernel 4.6.3-1-ck modules.  You must install them to use DKMS!

on rolling back to 4.5.7-1-ck along with

warning: could not get file information for usr/lib/modules/4.6.3-1-ck/kernel/xxxxxxx.ko.gz

on removing dkms modules.

Last edited by nomorewindows (2016-07-02 20:05:51)

graysky · 2016-07-02 20:09:10

Can you try the generic package and report back?

nomorewindows · 2016-07-02 20:17:42

graysky wrote:

Can you try the generic package and report back?

Same problems with linux-ck also. Looks like I may have gotten dkms to straighten up by reinstalling it.

Last edited by nomorewindows (2016-07-02 20:20:01)

Arch Linux

#2726 2016-05-11 07:57:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2727 2016-05-11 08:32:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2728 2016-06-08 07:18:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2729 2016-06-08 11:04:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2730 2016-06-12 03:53:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2731 2016-06-13 17:36:23

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2732 2016-06-13 17:38:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2733 2016-06-13 18:35:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2734 2016-06-14 00:03:26

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2735 2016-06-27 00:57:55

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2736 2016-06-27 05:26:46

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2737 2016-06-27 17:14:44

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2738 2016-06-28 20:49:25

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2739 2016-06-28 20:51:16

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2740 2016-06-28 21:01:01

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2741 2016-06-28 21:18:47

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2742 2016-06-29 13:04:36

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2743 2016-06-29 13:50:13

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2744 2016-07-02 12:41:24

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2745 2016-07-02 12:46:54

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2746 2016-07-02 13:07:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2747 2016-07-02 19:31:40

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2748 2016-07-02 20:05:12

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2749 2016-07-02 20:09:10

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#2750 2016-07-02 20:17:42

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer