You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Where can I dowload all the packages (pkgname.pkg.tar.gz)???
AUR only shows me where to download the source, pkgbuild-file,...
This is very weird...
Offline
For packages in unsupported, that's all that exists - PKGBUILD and related files. We don't make binary packages for those ones.
However, the TUs take certain popular packages into [community], which is a binary repo, and can be enabled in /etc/pacman.conf
Offline
In case you're wondering, "popular" means in the region of 25 votes - so if there's something you'd like to see in community, get voting.
Offline
And if you want to build packages from AUR in a semi-automated fashion, you can use the aurbuild tool... which is in AUR.
Dusty
Offline
You can grab the .pkg.tar.gz files for the binary packages from any of the mirror ftp servers.
Offline
/var/abs/community/system/aurbuild
Just a matter of hours/days and it's even pacman'able.
1000
Offline
/var/abs/community/system/aurbuild
Just a matter of hours/days and it's even pacman'able.
Hm? I thought the TUs as a whole agreed that it wouldn't be going into community due to certain things that have been discussed tons of times... who's adopting this?
Offline
byte wrote:/var/abs/community/system/aurbuild
Just a matter of hours/days and it's even pacman'able.
Hm? I thought the TUs as a whole agreed that it wouldn't be going into community due to certain things that have been discussed tons of times... who's adopting this?
That's also what I thought.
Offline
RCS file: /home/cvs-community/community/system/aurbuild/PKGBUILD,v
Working file: aurbuild/PKGBUILD
head: 1.1
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
CURRENT: 1.1
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 1; selected revisions: 1
description:
----------------------------
revision 1.1
date: 2005/12/28 18:23:55; author: phrakture; state: Exp;
upgpkg: aurbuild 0.9-1
=============================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs-community/community/system/aurbuild/aurbuild.install,v
Working file: aurbuild/aurbuild.install
head: 1.1
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
CURRENT: 1.1
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 1; selected revisions: 1
description:
----------------------------
revision 1.1
date: 2005/12/28 18:23:55; author: phrakture; state: Exp;
upgpkg: aurbuild 0.9-1
=============================================================================
Apparantly phrakture put it in a while ago, but clearly it's not uploaded. Nothing to see here folks...
These are not the droids you're looking for....
Offline
Yes. But today it has been added to the abs tree. So I assume someone has tagged it or ran communitypkg. :?
Offline
i have a Silly question doesnt the bild() make and install the package??
Be yourself, because you are all that you can be
Offline
build() in a PKGBUILD runs .configure, make and make install and makepkg wraps the result up to create a package that you must install yourself.
1000
Offline
build() in a PKGBUILD runs .configure, make and make install and makepkg wraps the result up to create a package that you must install yourself.
and how do u install that??
Be yourself, because you are all that you can be
Offline
pacman -U
1000
Offline
byte wrote:/var/abs/community/system/aurbuild
Just a matter of hours/days and it's even pacman'able.
Hm? I thought the TUs as a whole agreed that it wouldn't be going into community due to certain things that have been discussed tons of times... who's adopting this?
After a fresh abs run, /var/abs/community/system got cleaned again.
1000
Offline
Thanks, I can find my way with the packages now... Start to like arch more and more...
Offline
Cerebral wrote:byte wrote:/var/abs/community/system/aurbuild
Just a matter of hours/days and it's even pacman'able.
Hm? I thought the TUs as a whole agreed that it wouldn't be going into community due to certain things that have been discussed tons of times... who's adopting this?
After a fresh abs run, /var/abs/community/system got cleaned again.
That's because aurbuild (and other packages) had been added to abs by mistake. It has been corrected by a TU.
Offline
Actually, I had to clean up because the update daemon was choking and wimping out on packages that didn't exist ... same thing
The suggestion box only accepts patches.
Offline
Pages: 1