You are not logged in.
$ cat .local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log | curl -F c=@- https://ptpb.pw
$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | curl -F c=@- https://ptpb.pw
Last edited by Technicus (2016-10-26 14:57:57)
Offline
?
Last edited by Technicus (2016-10-26 14:58:25)
Offline
You can use
ls -l /var/log/Xorg.0.log ~/.local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log
to figure out which one is the youngest and post only that one.
remove xf86-video-ati , you don't need it and at best it clutters up the log.
re-start X and post fresh xorg log .
How are your monitors connected ?
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
$ ls -l /var/log/Xorg.0.log ~/.local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 technician technician 47692 Oct 27 08:49 /home/technician/.local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68278 Oct 27 08:48 /var/log/Xorg.0.log
$ cat .local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log | curl -F c=@- https://ptpb.pw
date: 2016-10-27T13:52:02.409000+00:00
digest: e8fc691ee6d1d07cfd0b97ee3adbc8d615d6f939
long: AOj8aR7m0dB8_QuX7jrbyNYV1vk5
short: 1vk5
size: 47692
url: https://ptpb.pw/1vk5
$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | curl -F c=@- https://ptpb.pw
date: 2016-10-27T13:54:26.599314+00:00
digest: 9237ec4e7733a1e31ed27f28f0f19cfd5dc1006a
long: AJI37E53M6HjHtJ_KPDxnP1dwQBq
short: wQBq
size: 68278
status: created
url: https://ptpb.pw/wQBq
uuid: e89c8a1e-63eb-4077-8308-39603b52602e
2 monitors are connected to a 4 port display-port hub, one monitor is connected to a DVI port.
The monitors on the hub are mirrored, however one monitor I turn off because it does not support the resolution of the other.
I do not know how to configure, or if it is possible, the monitors to have different resolutions on the hub.
But surely there must be a way because Jason Graves did it.
I have been ignoring this for now because they span to the monitor on the DVI connection.
Ideally I would like to have all connected to the display-port hub and spanned across all three with different resolutions.
Last edited by Technicus (2016-10-27 14:03:53)
Offline
Keep in mind Jason Graves used enterprise/workstation class Nvidia cards with nvidia proprietary drivers.
looking at both xorg logs, I think you boot into a display manager, then login to a console ?
If so, switch back to multi-user.target for now , https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sy … _boot_into
power down the system, power on alll 3 monitors.
boot , start x , post log .
power down, connect all 3 monitors to the hub .
boot, start x, post log .
With a bit of luck those two logs will clarify how linux / X see those monitors on the display port hub.
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
Not connected to hub:
$ cat .local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log | curl -F c=@- https://ptpb.pw
date: 2016-10-27T22:31:54.838606+00:00
digest: dc2a293ef2607da091d42061167e27e218d67c7f
long: ANwqKT7yYH2gkdQgYRZ-J-IY1nx_
short: 1nx_
size: 44548
status: created
url: https://ptpb.pw/1nx_
uuid: e51b77b5-5cdb-4c1a-a8f2-4758df3ca6cb
$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | curl -F c=@- https://ptpb.pw
cat: /var/log/Xorg.0.log: No such file or directory
date: 2015-03-03T00:05:42.457000+00:00
digest: da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
long: ANo5o-5ea0sNMlW_75VgGJCv2AcJ
short: 2AcJ
size: 0
status: already exists
url: https://ptpb.pw/2AcJ
All monitors connected to hub:
*They will all work if the resolution is 1280 x 1024.
$ cat .local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log | curl -F c=@- https://ptpb.pw
date: 2016-10-27T22:40:37.393357+00:00
digest: 36ee9fe31be981ffd996c6ff6095406e60e7cebe
long: ADbun-Mb6YH_2ZbG_2CVQG5g586-
short: 586-
size: 41248
status: created
url: https://ptpb.pw/586-
uuid: ae103d6b-67da-4653-96df-e8dcd0df7b68
$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | curl -F c=@- https://ptpb.pw
cat: /var/log/Xorg.0.log: No such file or directory
date: 2015-03-03T00:05:42.457000+00:00
digest: da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
long: ANo5o-5ea0sNMlW_75VgGJCv2AcJ
short: 2AcJ
size: 0
status: already exists
url: https://ptpb.pw/2AcJ
It looks like in the log that only one monitor is detected by the hub. The LG Ultra wide, as for the Acer AL1717d and HP Compaq LA1751g . . . nothing. Maybe they lack the necessary features.
Last edited by Technicus (2016-10-27 22:59:30)
Offline
This technology appears to need monitors that support Display Port 1.2 .
DP1.2 was introduced in dec 2009, are the acer and hp monitors young enough to support that ?
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
It looks like neither of them meet the specifications:
Too bad. I plan on getting new monitors anyway. When I do, I'll make sure they are up to par with the displayport requirements. I'll let you know how it goes. Might be a while though.
Last edited by Technicus (2016-10-28 17:37:46)
Offline
Update, I am trying this again.
Same video card,
The 3-Port Multi Monitor Display Port MST HUB
model: MSTDP123DP
https://www.startech.com/AV/Displayport … MSTDP123DP
1 Dynex - 19" Class / 720p / 60Hz / LCD HDTV - Multi
Model: DX-19L150A11
https://www.dynexproducts.com/pdp/DX-19L150A11/9602913
2 23" B2330H Series 30 Monitor
Model: B2330H
http://www.samsung.com/africa_en/consum … PUHKFV/XA/
The best I can do is three monitors with the same screen.
Offline
how does xrandr see these monitors, as HDMI-screens or as DP-screens ?
Note DisplayPort 1.2 with MST+HBR2 support from the GPU is required for independent display output
No idea what MST & HBR2 are, but maybe someone else knows and can verify if the RX 460 supports it .
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
MST = Multi-Stream Transport.
Iirc, the card in question is DisplayPort 1.4 compatible. The card in question should have no problem with MST.
HBR2 = High Bit Rate 2
This is basically doubling of the bit rate supported by DisplayPort. Iirc originally introduced with DP1.2 so the card should also support that since it's DP1.4 compatible.
I personally think the problem is with your last configurations (assuming the hub isn't broken).
EDIT: For reference, from the AMD site (http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graph … eon-rx-480)
AMD EYEFINITY TECHNOLOGY (MAXIMUM DISPLAYS)*: Up to 6 displays with DisplayPort MST hub
*: AMD Eyefinity technology supports multiple monitors on an enabled graphics card. Supported display quantity, type and resolution vary by model and board design; confirm specifications with manufacturer before purchase. To enable more than two displays, or multiple displays from a single output, additional hardware such as DisplayPort™-ready monitors or DisplayPort 1.2 MST-enabled hubs may be required. A maximum of two active adapters is recommended for consumer systems. See www.amd.com/eyefinityfaq for full details.
Since EyeFinity consists of unique displays, not cloned ones, I'm pretty sure it must be a configuration problem at this point.
Last edited by Omar007 (2017-02-17 12:40:12)
Offline