You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#26 2006-06-11 21:55:35
- Cerebral
- Forum Fellow
- From: Waterloo, ON, CA
- Registered: 2005-04-08
- Posts: 3,108
- Website
Re: how to deal with x86_64 and AUR
dtw wrote:
That oversight is that TUs were never supposed to confirm that every pkg in the AUR actually built. The "flag safe" is purely to confirm that there is no malicious code or otherwise involved.
neotuli wrote:
Someone around here agrees with my definition of "safe".
That's always the way I've done it - I certainly don't build every app I flag.
Offline
#27 2006-06-12 14:56:23
- dtw
- Forum Fellow
- From: UK
- Registered: 2004-08-03
- Posts: 4,439
- Website
Re: how to deal with x86_64 and AUR
I very much doubt any TU does but I think some people might think that we do 
Offline
#28 2006-06-12 16:41:05
- neotuli
- Lazy Developer
- From: London, UK
- Registered: 2004-07-06
- Posts: 1,204
- Website
Re: how to deal with x86_64 and AUR
I didn't say it was a TU that yelled at me
The suggestion box only accepts patches.
Offline
#29 2006-06-12 20:01:04
- dtw
- Forum Fellow
- From: UK
- Registered: 2004-08-03
- Posts: 4,439
- Website
Re: how to deal with x86_64 and AUR
neotuli wrote:
and neither did I 
Offline
#30 2006-08-15 14:09:13
- sebcactus
- Member
- From: Germany
- Registered: 2005-01-27
- Posts: 277
Re: how to deal with x86_64 and AUR
Maybe, just add a comment.
Offline