You are not logged in.
Attempting to migrate a 32 bit Arch system to 64 bit. I followed the instructions in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mi … hitectures
Everything was going as expected until I got to the installation of the linux package. At first, i ran
#pacman -S linux
as instructed an there was an x86_64 suffix on the package name.
However, I was low on space in my boot partition and the installation failed. I had linux-lts and my own compiled version in the boot directory and was running on my custom 4.9.30 kernel, so I uninstalled linux-lts to free space with a
#pacman -R linux-lts
But when I tried to run
#pacman -S linux
again, it seems to want to install the 32 bit version again (There is no longer a n x86_64 suffix on the package name. I DO have Architecture = x86_64 in /etc/pacman.conf and $arch on all the sites in /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
I also tried
#pacman --arch x86_64 -S linux
with the same results.
Any suggestions on what I'm doing wrong?
Last edited by rossboulet (2017-06-13 13:47:38)
I really hate this damn machine,
I wish that they would sell it.
It never does just what I want,
But only what I tell it. -Anonymous
Offline
Attempting to migrate a 32 bit Arch system to 64 bit. I followed the instructions in https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mi … hitectures
That page presents 2 completely different methods. The rest of your post indicates that you are upgrading from the target system, but please be specific in the future.
But when I tried to run
#pacman -S linux
again, it seems to want to install the 32 bit version again (There is no longer a n x86_64 suffix on the package name)
"Seems" expresses uncertainty. What is the exact output of the command?
My Arch Linux Stuff • Forum Etiquette • Community Ethos - Arch is not for everyone
Offline
Yes, I was using Method 2 (on a running system) on the migration page.
what I saw was:
#pacman -S linux
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
Packages (1) linux-4.11.3-1
Total Installed Size: 80.49 MiB
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
The first time through, that failed because the boot partition was full, there was an "x86_64" added to the package name.
I really hate this damn machine,
I wish that they would sell it.
It never does just what I want,
But only what I tell it. -Anonymous
Offline
You won't see the architecture appended to the package name, just hit 'Y'.
Offline
I see now where I was confused. I did see the "x86_64" the first time through, but it was not when pacman presented the package name, but when it was being downloaded.
#pacman -S linux
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
Packages (1) linux-4.11.3-1
Total Installed Size: 80.49 MiB
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
:: Retrieving packages...
linux-4.11.3-1-x86_64 ...... <<<<<there it is
I knew I saw it the first time, but from then on, it was in my cache so it did not download again. Thus, I never saw the "x86_64" again because pacman didn't need to download it again.
Last edited by rossboulet (2017-06-13 13:48:48)
I really hate this damn machine,
I wish that they would sell it.
It never does just what I want,
But only what I tell it. -Anonymous
Offline