You are not logged in.
Any reason to use one over another?
Thank you for your help.
Last edited by jaume (2017-08-13 18:58:42)
I'm Catalan from Mallorca, I love Barcelona & Catalan Countries
Offline
No AUR helpers are officially supported, see the matrix in the end of this page and decide for your self.
I possess a device, in my pocket, that is capable of accessing the entirety of information known to man.
I use it to look at funny pictures of cats and to argue with strangers.
Offline
Thank you for you help!
I'm Catalan from Mallorca, I love Barcelona & Catalan Countries
Offline
After reading the title, I expected to see some commands in your post ... but there aren't any. So what are you asking: are yaourt and pacaur the same? Of course not. I mean I don't know what your definition of "same" is, but clearly they are not identical. They both - along with countless other tools - fill a similar general niche, but asking if they are the same is like asking if vim and emacs are the same.
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
Excuse me I'll try to explain
For my vim it is easier to handle because I know many commands
For my Emacs it is more complicated to use because I do not dominate the commands but I know it is more free software than vi.
Yaourt has more packages than pacaur? Or do they have the same packages?
Is pacaur more free software than yaourt or is it the same?
Thanks in advance and excuse my English!
I'm Catalan from Mallorca, I love Barcelona & Catalan Countries
Offline
Yaourt has more packages than pacaur? Or do they have the same packages?
Could you explain what you mean by more packages? Where do you believe yaourt and pacaur obtain packages from?
Offline
Here (*) i found the explanation i was looking for yaourt vs pacaur
(*) Why I Use Pacaur Instead of Yaourt
(*) https://cubethethird.wordpress.com/2017 … of-yaourt/
Thank you for your help and excuse my English!
I'm Catalan from Mallorca, I love Barcelona & Catalan Countries
Offline
For my Emacs it is more complicated to use because I do not dominate the commands but I know it is more free software than vi.
Er, no.
Offline
What sport, eh!
Offline
jaume wrote:For my Emacs it is more complicated to use because I do not dominate the commands but I know it is more free software than vi.
Er, no.
Perhaps jaume is equating emacs being under the GPL3 as being more free than vi being under a BSD style license but this does seem to be going off topic.
Offline
jasonwryan wrote:jaume wrote:For my Emacs it is more complicated to use because I do not dominate the commands but I know it is more free software than vi.
Er, no.
Perhaps jaume is equating emacs being under the GPL3 as being more free than vi being under a BSD style license but this does seem to be going off topic.
If you forgive! It's off topic
Thank you for your help
I'm Catalan from Mallorca, I love Barcelona & Catalan Countries
Offline