You are not logged in.

#1 2006-06-29 08:52:37

varaahan
Member
From: Chennai , India
Registered: 2006-05-29
Posts: 145

udev / devfsd

What is udev and devfsd and what is the difference?
Why pacman asks me to install udev over devfsd ?
Last time when said yes, I could not load my eth0 (8139too).
So I keep avoiding it.


Linux learner and admirer - ALWAYS
Regd Linux User : 431318

Offline

#2 2006-06-29 13:12:19

Gullible Jones
Member
Registered: 2004-12-29
Posts: 4,863

Re: udev / devfsd

Ouch, how long since you last updated? Alright... I assume you have a MOD_AUTOLOAD line in rc.conf, which is set to "yes"? If not, you need to make some updates to rc.conf. If yes, and the autoloader doesn't find your ethernet module, just put it in the module load list.

Offline

#3 2006-06-29 14:56:07

brain0
Developer
From: Aachen - Germany
Registered: 2005-01-03
Posts: 1,382

Re: udev / devfsd

varaahan wrote:

What is udev and devfsd and what is the difference?
Why pacman asks me to install udev over devfsd ?
Last time when said yes, I could not load my eth0 (8139too).
So I keep avoiding it.

devfsd hasn't been used in months anyway. You can safely uninstall it.

Offline

#4 2006-06-29 15:58:45

phrakture
Arch Overlord
From: behind you
Registered: 2003-10-29
Posts: 7,879
Website

Re: udev / devfsd

devfsd isn't even supported by the kernel anymore.

If you're having a problem with 8139too, then it's most likely caused by 8139cp - these two modules both respond to the same device IDs, so are both loaded and they kludge each other.

try using

MODULES=(.....blah blah ... !8139cp)

in rc.conf, to blacklist that module and prevent it from loading.

Offline

#5 2006-06-29 16:11:07

Gullible Jones
Member
Registered: 2004-12-29
Posts: 4,863

Re: udev / devfsd

Or put it on the MOD_BLACKLIST list, the effect is exactly the same IIRC.

Offline

#6 2006-06-29 16:45:21

phrakture
Arch Overlord
From: behind you
Registered: 2003-10-29
Posts: 7,879
Website

Re: udev / devfsd

Gullible Jones wrote:

Or put it on the MOD_BLACKLIST list, the effect is exactly the same IIRC.

Yeah, but I like the ! syntax better.  It makes the array more concise, and follows the rest of the rc.conf arrays.

Offline

#7 2006-06-29 17:20:05

Gullible Jones
Member
Registered: 2004-12-29
Posts: 4,863

Re: udev / devfsd

Perhaps the MOD_BLACKLIST array should be removed from rc.conf?

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB