You are not logged in.
After I execute `man ps` it shows me the POSIX Programmers Manual and this message
This manual page is part of the POSIX Programmer's Manual.
The Linux implementation of this interface may
Is there a way to install linux manual? Or POSIX manual is still a good one?
Last edited by ojles (2017-12-18 08:33:52)
Offline
`man 1 ps` vs `man 1p ps` ?
procps-ng not installed?
Last edited by Mr.Elendig (2017-12-17 16:27:39)
Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest
Offline
@Mr.Elendig
`man 1 ps` vs `man 1p ps` ?
`man 1 ps` opens PS(1P) page
procps-ng not installed?
Installed and it works. But `man ls` is 'LS(1P) POSIX Programmer's Manual'
It's not that I need the manual for `ls`, but just curious how can I change this to linux manual
Last edited by ojles (2017-12-17 16:41:41)
Offline
No, just edit your first post and prepend "[Solved]" to the thread title. ![]()
EDIT: oh, ninja edit
Last edited by eschwartz (2017-12-17 16:51:13)
Managing AUR repos The Right Way -- aurpublish (now a standalone tool)
Offline
No, just edit your first post and prepend "[Solved]" to the thread title.
Thanks
EDIT: oh, ninja edit
Yep, forgot about it.
Offline
locale issue? Is it the english manpage?
ls.1 is in coreutils, ls.1p in man-pages
man ls
man 1 ls
man 1p ls
LC_ALL=C man lsOffline
locale issue? Is it the english manpage?
ls.1 is in coreutils, ls.1p in man-pagesman ls man 1 ls man 1p ls LC_ALL=C man ls
After installing coreutils man was showing LS(1).
Can you explain me how did you get to this solution?
Offline
How did you go without coreutils? It's a dependency for the kernel packages.
It also provides the ls binary.
=> What OS are actually you running?
It would seem some busybox based?
Offline
How did you go without coreutils? It's a dependency for the kernel packages.
It also provides the ls binary.=> What OS are actually you running?
It would seem some busybox based?
I guess I had busybox installed.
$ uname -a
Linux archlinux 4.13.11-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Nov 2 10:25:56 CET 2017 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Offline
I guess I had busybox installed.
That wasn't the question. I also have busybox installed, but I also have coreutils (I'd love not to, but that's not really possible in arch). So the question is not whether you had busybox in addition to coreutils, but how could you not have coreutils installed?
Note that if you are running a busybox shell (e.g., ash) with a prefer-applets option then `man` is a builtin and is not calling /usr/bin/man, so it may behave quite differently.
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
That wasn't the question. I also have busybox installed, but I also have coreutils (I'd love not to, but that's not really possible in arch). So the question is not whether you had busybox in addition to coreutils, but how could you not have coreutils installed?
To be honest, I don't know. But I found my pacman logs.
[2017-09-14 01:27] [ALPM] installed coreutils (8.28-1)
after that
[2017-12-18 10:27] [PACMAN] Running 'pacman -S coreutils'
[2017-12-18 10:27] [ALPM] transaction started
[2017-12-18 10:27] [ALPM] reinstalled coreutils (8.28-1)
[2017-12-18 10:27] [ALPM] transaction completed
[2017-12-18 10:27] [ALPM] running 'systemd-update.hook'...
[2017-12-18 10:27] [ALPM] running 'texinfo-install.hook'...
EDIT: after this reinstalation man was working
Last edited by ojles (2017-12-18 14:36:10)
Offline