You are not logged in.

#1 2018-02-14 08:22:38

Doron.Behar
Member
Registered: 2016-12-21
Posts: 20

Why the package `syncthing-inotify` was removed?

Title.

If now the normal `syncthing` package provides it it should be added to the `syncthing`'s `PKGBUILD`.

Last edited by Doron.Behar (2018-02-14 08:22:56)

Offline

#2 2018-02-14 11:48:58

WorMzy
Forum Moderator
From: Scotland
Registered: 2010-06-16
Posts: 7,922
Website

Re: Why the package `syncthing-inotify` was removed?

https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/a … 55926.html

This is an odd one, because the packages don't conflict, and syncthing-inotify can continue to be used (according to the github page), so adding a conflict or replaces doesn't seem appropriate.

It may be worth opening a bug report and getting confirmation from the dev whether they have considered this, but it's not uncommon for package maintainers to quietly drop packages from the repositories, and relying on users noticing this while doing maintainence on their systems (such packages are listed by 'pacman -Qm').


Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI X299 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC // Processor: Intel Core i7-7820X 3.6GHz // GFX: nVidia GeForce GTX 970 // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 5x 1TB HDD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD

Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB