You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Installing Arch on my laptop takes about 10 to 15 minutes (with XFCE DE).
Below are my specs:
Type: Lenovo ideapad 320-15ABR date: 05/22/2017
CPU: Quad Core AMD A10-9620P RADEON R5 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G (-MCP-) speed/min/max: 1425/1300/2500 MHz
Mem: 11458.5 MiB
Storage: 931.51 GiB
HDD Rotation Rate: 5400 rpm
The other day I wanted to install Debian buster, but for some reason it took more than 1 hour to complete the entire installation (XFCE included).
Even the base installation took about 20 to 30 minutes
So what is the reason for Arch's superior speed? Does it handle resources more efficiently?
I know pacman is great, but is apt from Debian really that slow?
Failure is success in progress.
A.E.
Offline
chrisdb wrote:I know pacman is great, but is apt from Debian really that slow?
Speaking out of personal experience?
Failure is success in progress.
A.E.
Offline
Did you follow the link and read the article?
Inofficial first vice president of the Rust Evangelism Strike Force
Offline
There is a typo in article name. The correct name should be "How i measured the speed of popular Linux distributions mirrors"
Their:
% docker run -t -i archlinux/base
[root@9604e4ae2367 /]# time (pacman -Sy && pacman -S --noconfirm qemu)
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core 132.2 KiB 751K/s 00:00
extra 1629.6 KiB 3.04M/s 00:01
community 4.9 MiB 6.16M/s 00:01
[…]
Total Download Size: 123.20 MiB
Total Installed Size: 587.84 MiB
[…]
real 1m2.475s
user 0m9.272s
sys 0m2.458s
My:
time (pacman -Syy && pacman -S --noconfirm qemu)
:: Synchronizing package databases...
shared 109.7 KiB 0.00B/s 00:00 [####################################################################] 100%
core 132.4 KiB 0.00B/s 00:00 [####################################################################] 100%
extra 1706.5 KiB 167M/s 00:00 [####################################################################] 100%
community 4.9 MiB 97.1M/s 00:00 [####################################################################] 100%
multilib 169.6 KiB 16.6M/s 00:00 [####################################################################] 100%
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
Package (1) New Version Net Change
extra/qemu 4.1.0-1 29.24 MiB
Total Installed Size: 29.24 MiB
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
(1/1) checking keys in keyring [####################################################################] 100%
(1/1) checking package integrity [####################################################################] 100%
(1/1) loading package files [####################################################################] 100%
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [####################################################################] 100%
(1/1) checking available disk space [####################################################################] 100%
:: Processing package changes...
(1/1) installing qemu [####################################################################] 100%
Optional dependencies for qemu
qemu-arch-extra: extra architectures support [installed]
samba: SMB/CIFS server support [installed]
qemu-block-iscsi: iSCSI block support [installed]
qemu-block-rbd: RBD block support
qemu-block-gluster: glusterfs block support
:: Running post-transaction hooks...
(1/4) Updating icon theme caches...
(2/4) Reloading device manager configuration...
(3/4) Arming ConditionNeedsUpdate...
(4/4) Updating the desktop file MIME type cache...
real 0m1.502s
user 0m1.251s
sys 0m0.144s
Funny benchmark..
Last edited by edacval (2019-09-03 11:07:46)
Offline
Did you follow the link and read the article?
I didn't see it at first
Failure is success in progress.
A.E.
Offline
Pages: 1