unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

graysky · 2019-11-03 13:00:37

It's fine, glad your system is working.

dobie2564 · 2019-11-06 14:39:43

Hello, After updating I find that I'm having a similar problem to the last poster. When I boot the linux-ck kernel I'm getting /lib/modules/5.3.8-4-ck-haswell/modules.devname not found. I've verified that it is there. My mkinitcpio is at 27.

The stock kernel boots OK. Any suggestions as to what to look for? Thanks.

berturion · 2019-11-08 04:34:09

dobie2564 wrote:

Hello, After updating I find that I'm having a similar problem to the last poster. When I boot the linux-ck kernel I'm getting /lib/modules/5.3.8-4-ck-haswell/modules.devname not found. I've verified that it is there. My mkinitcpio is at 27.
The stock kernel boots OK. Any suggestions as to what to look for? Thanks.

I also have this issue after having manually downloaded and installed linux-ck-skylake-5.3.9-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst with headers. I have done that because I had 404 errors for the version before (5.3.8) when pacman tried to download them. I think something is out of sync or broken right now with the repo-ck.

:: Procéder à l’installation ? [O/n]
:: Récupération des paquets…
erreur : échec de récupération du fichier « linux-ck-skylake-5.3.8-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst » depuis repo-ck.com : The requested URL returned error: 404
avertissement : erreur lors de la récupération de certains fichiers
erreur : échec de récupération du fichier « linux-ck-skylake-headers-5.3.8-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst » depuis repo-ck.com : The requested URL returned error: 404
avertissement : erreur lors de la récupération de certains fichiers
erreur : la validation de la transaction a échoué (échec de récupération de certains fichiers)
Des erreurs se sont produites, aucun paquet n’a été mis à jour.
Error installing repo packages

EDIT : add console output

Last edited by berturion (2019-11-08 04:45:53)

graysky · 2019-11-08 12:01:22

@berturion - Fixed thanks.

dobie2564 · 2019-11-08 15:20:59

Thanks for the fix. I've gotten past that problem, but linux-ck-haswell is not detecting the nvidia card, and I end up with a blank screen. It has worked previously on this machine with no issue and the stock kernel books OK. Can you give a suggestion about that? Thanks.

graysky · 2019-11-08 15:26:27

Are you using the nvidia-dkms package and do you have the corresponding headers for haswell install?

berturion · 2019-11-08 16:10:35

graysky wrote:

@berturion - Fixed thanks.

Thank you @graysky !

dobie2564 · 2019-11-09 01:44:45

graysky wrote:

Are you using the nvidia-dkms package and do you have the corresponding headers for haswell install?

I don't have the nvidia-dkms package installed. Is it a new requirement?

Edit: I read back a few pages and saw the discussion of nvidia-dkms. I don't quite follow all of it. Is it correct to say that if you use the package nvidia-ck-haswell that nvidia-dkms is now a pre-req?

Last edited by dobie2564 (2019-11-09 01:50:15)

graysky · 2019-11-09 06:10:34

dobie2564 wrote:

graysky wrote:
Are you using the nvidia-dkms package and do you have the corresponding headers for haswell install?
I don't have the nvidia-dkms package installed. Is it a new requirement?
Edit: I read back a few pages and saw the discussion of nvidia-dkms. I don't quite follow all of it. Is it correct to say that if you use the package nvidia-ck-haswell that nvidia-dkms is now a pre-req?

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 1#p1868051

graysky wrote:

With the recent update removing extramodules, I don't have the time/resources to keep providing the broadcom and nvidia* packages. With the release of 5.2.21 today, I will point users of broadcom-wl-ck, nvidia-ck, and nvidia-390xx-ck to install the official dkms package(s) which so long as you have the linux-ck-flavor-headers installed, will get built automatically for you. Since nvidia-340xx-dkms has been removed from [extra], please use the nvidia-340xx-dkms package from the AUR.

Tharbad · 2019-11-12 17:44:07

Found a pacman hook for nvidia-ck:

[Trigger]
Operation=Install
Operation=Upgrade
Operation=Remove
Type=Package
Target=nvidia-ck
Target=linux-ck-ivybridge

[Action]
Description=Update Nvidia module in initcpio
Depends=mkinitcpio
When=PostTransaction
NeedsTargets
Exec=/bin/sh -c 'while read -r trg; do case $trg in linux) exit 0; esac; done; /usr/bin/mkinitcpio -P'

Should I update it or just delete it?

cirrus · 2019-11-17 21:05:10

Tharbad wrote:

Should I update it or just delete it?

graysky wrote:

With the recent update removing extramodules, I don't have the time/resources to keep providing the broadcom and nvidia* packages. With the release of 5.2.21 today, I will point users of broadcom-wl-ck, nvidia-ck, nvidia-340xx-ck, and nvidia-390xx-ck to the respective dkms packages which are now live in the AUR and will build these for you automatically.
If you're using a linux-ck optimized package, you will need to change the respective dkms PKGBUILD to reflect that package's name. For example, linux-ck-zen. Look in the dkms PKGBUILD for the line defining the _kernelname variable. Change it from 'linux-ck' to 'linux-ck-zen' (or to match your kernel package).

I hope this answers your question regarding Pacman hook.

Tharbad · 2019-11-18 03:45:23

cirrus wrote:

Tharbad wrote:
Should I update it or just delete it?
graysky wrote:
With the recent update removing extramodules, I don't have the time/resources to keep providing the broadcom and nvidia* packages. With the release of 5.2.21 today, I will point users of broadcom-wl-ck, nvidia-ck, nvidia-340xx-ck, and nvidia-390xx-ck to the respective dkms packages which are now live in the AUR and will build these for you automatically.
If you're using a linux-ck optimized package, you will need to change the respective dkms PKGBUILD to reflect that package's name. For example, linux-ck-zen. Look in the dkms PKGBUILD for the line defining the _kernelname variable. Change it from 'linux-ck' to 'linux-ck-zen' (or to match your kernel package).
I hope this answers your question regarding Pacman hook.

Nope. I'll clarify:
I'm not sure if the dkms is triggering a rebuild automatically or if I need a hook. Since that hook was auto-generated by some package I assumed someone here will know.

cirrus · 2019-11-19 20:20:33

The respective dkms package will suffice, delete the hook nvidia-ck is no more.

Tharbad · 2019-11-19 23:28:53

cirrus wrote:

The respective dkms package will suffice, delete the hook nvidia-ck is no more.

Thanks!

Lockheed · 2019-11-23 21:45:27

I was trying to build linux-ck on a Pentium 4 machine (Pentium M). In PKGBUILD I changed arch=pentium4, so that compiler could start. However, after whole night of compilation, I got an error:

cc1: error: core model 'kernel' not supported in the 32 bit mode
cc1: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build.281: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile.1132:prepare0] Error 2

Have I missed something? Is there a way around it?

Last edited by Lockheed (2019-11-24 09:27:32)

Tharbad · 2019-12-10 20:42:27

Some pentium 4 CPUs are 64bit and some are not. You should ask in the general forum. There might be a special name for a P4 64bit arch.

Tharbad · 2019-12-14 14:23:38

Installing the new nvidia driver causes the system to fail on loading the login manager.
Journalctl shows those errors:
NVRM: API mismatch: the client has the version 440.44, but
NVRM: this kernel module has the version 440.36. Please
NVRM: make sure that this kernel module and all NVIDIA driver
NVRM: components have the same version.

modinfo shows that all the installed versions are 440.44.
Downgrading t0 440.36 solved this.

Note: there is a bug opened about this due to fact that 440.44 requires kernel v 5.4.3 and arch linux version is 5.4.2.

graysky · 2019-12-14 14:46:06

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=251380

Please keep posts in this thread about the repo or repo packages.

Tharbad · 2019-12-14 14:52:15

graysky wrote:

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=251380
Please keep posts in this thread about the repo or repo packages.

I saw that. The problem is that ck version is already 5.4.3 so there shouldn't be any problem. But there is one. Can you check on your end?

graysky · 2019-12-14 15:18:14

Nothing to check... if there is an issue building the driver, it is in the driver's dkms package.

Tharbad · 2019-12-15 16:41:30

Found the culprit: I use nvidia mkinitcpio hooks which means I need a pacman hook to run mkinitcpio after an nvidia-dkms update.

graysky · 2019-12-31 22:45:40

Added zen2 to the repo.

glitsj16 · 2020-01-04 11:03:48

@graysky Any reason why there's no linux-ck-core2 for 5.4.7 in the repo?

graysky · 2020-01-04 12:26:32

glitsj16 wrote:

@graysky Any reason why there's no linux-ck-core2 for 5.4.7 in the repo?

Not sure why it didn't transfer. Try now.

glitsj16 · 2020-01-04 19:03:48

@graysky Confirming linux-ck-core is back ^. Thanks!

Arch Linux

#3576 2019-11-03 13:00:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3577 2019-11-06 14:39:43

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3578 2019-11-08 04:34:09

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3579 2019-11-08 12:01:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3580 2019-11-08 15:20:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3581 2019-11-08 15:26:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3582 2019-11-08 16:10:35

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3583 2019-11-09 01:44:45

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3584 2019-11-09 06:10:34

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3585 2019-11-12 17:44:07

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3586 2019-11-17 21:05:10

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3587 2019-11-18 03:45:23

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3588 2019-11-19 20:20:33

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3589 2019-11-19 23:28:53

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3590 2019-11-23 21:45:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3591 2019-12-10 20:42:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3592 2019-12-14 14:23:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3593 2019-12-14 14:46:06

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3594 2019-12-14 14:52:15

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3595 2019-12-14 15:18:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3596 2019-12-15 16:41:30

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3597 2019-12-31 22:45:40

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3598 2020-01-04 11:03:48

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3599 2020-01-04 12:26:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#3600 2020-01-04 19:03:48

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer