You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#26 2020-04-07 18:56:47
- bisarch
- Member
- Registered: 2020-04-07
- Posts: 60
Re: [SOLVED] Weird behavior with g++ (v.9.3.0)
Try adding the following in the beginning and compiling using /usr/bin/g++
#include <cstdarg>This shouldn't be needed but just in order to diagnose.
Offline
#27 2020-04-07 19:04:31
- SyntaxError
- Member
- From: null
- Registered: 2017-07-25
- Posts: 35
Re: [SOLVED] Weird behavior with g++ (v.9.3.0)
Try adding the following in the beginning and compiling using /usr/bin/g++
#include <cstdarg>This shouldn't be needed but just in order to diagnose.
Sadly no difference
"Never miss a good chance to shut up"
- Will Rogers
Offline
#28 2020-04-07 19:19:58
- SyntaxError
- Member
- From: null
- Registered: 2017-07-25
- Posts: 35
Re: [SOLVED] Weird behavior with g++ (v.9.3.0)
Found the solution. In
/usr/include/c++/9.3.0/there was two symlinks which when removed resolved the issue. These symlinks where made by me some time ago.
"Never miss a good chance to shut up"
- Will Rogers
Offline
#29 2020-04-07 21:35:38
- Trilby
- Inspector Parrot
- Registered: 2011-11-29
- Posts: 30,330
- Website
Re: [SOLVED] Weird behavior with g++ (v.9.3.0)
Out of curiosity, what were they? They should have shown up in the pacman -Qkk output.
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
#30 2020-04-07 21:47:06
- SyntaxError
- Member
- From: null
- Registered: 2017-07-25
- Posts: 35
Re: [SOLVED] Weird behavior with g++ (v.9.3.0)
It was
stddef: /usr/include/c++/9.3.0/stddef.h -> /usr/include/stddef.h
stdarg: /usr/include/c++/9.3.0/stdarg.h -> /usr/include/c++/9.3.0/tr1/stdarg.h They were a part of a badly hotfix I applied a while ago.
"Never miss a good chance to shut up"
- Will Rogers
Offline