You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2006-09-07 21:47:32
- phrakture
- Arch Overlord
- From: behind you
- Registered: 2003-10-29
- Posts: 7,879
- Website
woah nanoblogger
Why have I not heard of this before!
http://nanoblogger.sourceforge.net/
Statically generated blog content from shell script for the win!
Offline
#2 2006-09-07 22:30:47
- stonedz
- Member
- From: Firenze, Italy
- Registered: 2006-08-29
- Posts: 30
- Website
Re: woah nanoblogger
Yes, this is a great tool, it produces quickly very clean and beautiful pages, I loved it!
If you're looking for something different try ou this ! A good advice, if I may say, phrakture. 
"Software is like sex, it's better when it's free." L.T.
Offline
#3 2006-09-07 22:35:21
- AllTom
- Member
- Registered: 2006-01-02
- Posts: 60
- Website
Re: woah nanoblogger
From the site: "codebase is large and complex".
I'm in!
Offline
#4 2006-09-08 01:04:02
- codemac
- Member
- From: Cliche Tech Place
- Registered: 2005-05-13
- Posts: 794
- Website
Re: woah nanoblogger
hahah,
I thought about using this for about 20 seconds before I saw that pyblosxom also can do static generation.
Not that I use it, but I'd much rather have the modular style of pyblosxom, and not some massive load 'o code.
o7 AllTom
Offline
#5 2006-09-08 01:31:31
- elasticdog
- Member
- From: Washington, USA
- Registered: 2005-05-02
- Posts: 995
- Website
Re: woah nanoblogger
Cool idea...the source code scares the bejesus out of me though! I wonder how hard it would be to do something like this in Ruby or Python...
Offline
#6 2006-09-10 07:54:52
- benplaut
- Member
- Registered: 2006-06-13
- Posts: 383
Re: woah nanoblogger
holy moly...
there's only so large a shell script should be before it starts to get a bit scary 0_0
Offline
#7 2006-09-11 15:06:13
- soloport
- Member
- Registered: 2005-03-01
- Posts: 442
Re: woah nanoblogger
At least it has to be a great resource for when you want to do something fancy in your own shell script. There's bound to be great examples, throughout. 
As for bloging, TiddlyWiki is my prefered tool. Can be published (RO, if you like) or can live on a thumb drive. I use it for project management. Couldn't live without the add-ons provided by TiddlyTools.
Offline
#8 2006-09-28 09:22:58
- klapmuetz
- Member
- From: Germany
- Registered: 2005-03-19
- Posts: 75
Re: woah nanoblogger
Cool idea...the source code scares the bejesus out of me though!
Ruby would be pretty easy. Require 'redcloth' and then either read STDIN or open a file and do run the method to_html ... python is probably the same, just that you have to use SPACE SPACE SPACE SPACE SPACE to_html.
Just kidding all you python folks. It's a great languag.e :-)
Hello girls, I like rock climbing, mountain biking and rafting! Write me!
Offline
#9 2006-09-28 09:37:12
- hehejo_
- Member
- From: Germany
- Registered: 2005-10-08
- Posts: 47
- Website
Re: woah nanoblogger
RedCloth is good for textile - but I recommend version 3.0.3 instead of 3.0.4.
3.0.4 messes up if :hard_breaks is set.
3.0.3 does it's job - however you can't have multipleline listelements (<li>).
Gruß, Johannes
http://www.hehejo.de
http://gallery.hehejo.de/jo
Offline
Pages: 1