You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#26 2006-10-27 01:09:01
- ralvez
- Member
- From: Canada
- Registered: 2005-12-06
- Posts: 1,730
- Website
Re: Firefox 2.0 into release?
Shadowhand,
Yes ... network.prefetch-next = false DOES MAKE a difference! The old 'snappy' feeling is back!
Thank you... much appreciated!!
/*goes away jumping like a rabbit and mumbling like a mad man */ :smile:
Offline
#27 2006-10-27 07:38:50
- Romashka
- Forum Fellow
- Registered: 2005-12-07
- Posts: 1,054
Re: Firefox 2.0 into release?
Shadowhand, why does firefox not depend on xul-runner anymore? :?
Previous situation with xul-runner + mozilla-firefox + mozilla-thunderbird + whatever needs gecko was better, IMHO.
to live is to die
Offline
#28 2006-10-27 08:07:36
- benplaut
- Member
- Registered: 2006-06-13
- Posts: 383
Re: Firefox 2.0 into release?
.
Last edited by benplaut (2021-06-25 12:36:17)
Offline
#29 2006-10-27 15:18:44
- JGC
- Developer
- Registered: 2003-12-03
- Posts: 1,664
Re: Firefox 2.0 into release?
Shadowhand, why does firefox not depend on xul-runner anymore? :?
Previous situation with xul-runner + mozilla-firefox + mozilla-thunderbird + whatever needs gecko was better, IMHO.
firefox never depended on xulrunner. The first version of firefox that will depend on xulrunner will be 3.0.
Offline
#30 2006-10-27 17:30:46
- Romashka
- Forum Fellow
- Registered: 2005-12-07
- Posts: 1,054
Re: Firefox 2.0 into release?
firefox never depended on xulrunner.
Hmm... then I missed something... I'm confused. Nevermind.
The first version of firefox that will depend on xulrunner will be 3.0.
I know this but for some strange reason thought that Arch already had firefox/thunderbird based on xulrunner.
Maybe I confused xulrunner with mozilla-common... But I'm sure I had it installed for some reason, maybe some other package required it. Oh, how I wish reverse dependency feature somewhere.
to live is to die
Offline
#31 2006-10-27 20:53:27
- stonecrest
- Member
- From: Boulder
- Registered: 2005-01-22
- Posts: 1,190
Re: Firefox 2.0 into release?
Maybe I confused xulrunner with mozilla-common... But I'm sure I had it installed for some reason, maybe some other package required it. Oh, how I wish reverse dependency feature somewhere.
pacman -R mozilla-common, see what complains.
I am a gated community.
Offline
#32 2006-10-27 21:12:12
- Romashka
- Forum Fellow
- Registered: 2005-12-07
- Posts: 1,054
Re: Firefox 2.0 into release?
Romashka wrote:Maybe I confused xulrunner with mozilla-common... But I'm sure I had it installed for some reason, maybe some other package required it. Oh, how I wish reverse dependency feature somewhere.
pacman -R mozilla-common, see what complains.
This is not what I want. I want a way to know reverse dependencies of not installed packages, like this is done on some distros' sites (frugalware.org, gentoo-portage.com etc.) + the same feature in pacman. Anyway this is offtopic.
to live is to die
Offline
#33 2006-10-27 22:13:01
- 1c3d0g
- Member
- Registered: 2006-07-05
- Posts: 81
Re: Firefox 2.0 into release?
Bleh. I'm still waiting for a Tango icon ff2 theme... until then, i am unhappy
Same here dude, same here. 
Offline