You are not logged in.
My aur package superslicer-stable (and some others) were flag for deletion.
So I have answer to the email which has inform me about this.
The mail was send to aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org , the co-maintainer and to the requester.
But it is not listed at the mail archive.
So no trusted aur user has ever seen my response. I have also send a mail to the general aur mailing list, but it is also not listed at tthe mailing archive.
The package was deleted without any option to tell a trusted aur user, why the package should keep in the aur.
How I can sand mails to the mailing list?
mail I have send to aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org for superslicer-stable :
```txt
This package ist not at community.
This is the stable version of supersilcer. community/superslicer is
only a prerelease.
Please keep this package.
Version of community/superslicer:
https://github.com/supermerill/SuperSli … e/2.4.58.2 (prerelease)
Verison of aur/superslicer-stable:
https://github.com/supermerill/SuperSli … /2.3.57.12
(stable)
On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 23:56 +0000, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for superslicer-stable
> [2]:
>
> superslicer is now in the community repo.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/superslicer-stable/
```
mail I have send to aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org for superslicer-prerelease :
```txt
I would expect that community/superslicer ist only temporary a
prerelease, because they do not want to move aur/wxgtk3-dev-314-opt to
communtiy, witch ist still needed by the stabel version.
This also means this package will everytime be deleted if a stabel
verison is released and will be readded, if a new prerelease ist
avaible.
I do not think this is a good idea.
Furthemore this package is not exacty identical to
community/superslicer because it does use the alpha directory for the
configuartion, like the offical binary does it.
This avoid damage config and lost of hours of fine-tuning.
So please keep this package.
On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 23:56 +0000, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
> yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for superslicer-
> prerelease
> [2]:
>
> superslicer is now in the community repo.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/super … rerelease/
```
Offline
The deletion request would be https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/a … 73346.html ?
There have been cases where mails were blocked based on sender ip address or domain .
What domain (the part behind the @) are your emails send from ?
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
I have use @lukas1818.de. I own the whole domain and the mail-server is web hosted by netcup.
A friend of me have similarly problem with another Webhoster.
In the past I was able to answer to another request.
Registering with this mail at the aur, bugreport and forum has also worked.
Offline
If you are having trouble using the lists, please contact mailman@lists.archlinux.org.
You can try mailing that address or other communication methods, like https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_IRC_channels .
Aside from the mail issue I took a quick peek at the request and the deleted pkgbuild .
In my opinion a name change (maybe to superslicer23 ) might be enough to resubmit it without fearing deletion , but it also needs some improvements.
If you do want to go that route, create a new thread and ask for review.
Lone_Wolf
P.S.
keep in mind i'm just an aur user like you, the TUs that maintain aur may feel different .
P.P.S.
When aur packages are deleted the files/history are not removed from the aur repository.
In case you don't have the latest version anymore, use
git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/superslicer-stable.gitto retrieve it.
Last edited by Lone_Wolf (2022-07-10 10:21:25)
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline