[SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

seth · 2023-03-01 07:11:24

seth wrote:

Another curiosity is that
ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
turned
ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 4 SControl 300)
Next to the bisecting kernels, try to suspend and wake the system and see whether the drive shows up.

andertalez · 2023-03-01 07:53:52

I have exactly the same problem after system upgrade today.

I have similar configuration: main NVM drive where root folder is and secondary SATA 3 drive (Samsung) where /home folder is mounted.
After upgrade to Linux 6.2.1 the SATA drive is not visible on boot and can't be mounted.

Hardware is the same regarding SATA controller:
lspci -vvvk -s 10000:e0:17
10000:e0:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP SATA Controller (rev 20) (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0])
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 144
Region 0: Memory at 50100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K]
Region 1: Memory at 50102800 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
Region 5: Memory at 50102000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K]
Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
Address: fee01000 Data: 0000
Capabilities: [70] Power Management version 3
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [a8] SATA HBA v1.0 BAR4 Offset=00000004
Kernel driver in use: ahci

dmesg | grep -Ei 'ata|sata|sda|disk|ahci|10000:e0:17'
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000044b2f000-0x0000000044bfefff] ACPI data
[ 0.007909] RAMDISK: [mem 0x36051000-0x3701ffff]
[ 0.008200] NODE_DATA(0) allocated [mem 0x4b07fb000-0x4b07fffff]
[ 0.062860] Memory: 16047036K/16551224K available (16384K kernel code, 2097K rwdata, 12664K rodata, 3172K init, 4224K bss, 503928K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
[ 0.149363] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149368] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149503] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149507] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149512] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149517] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149522] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149526] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149531] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149535] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149540] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149543] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149548] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149553] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149557] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149561] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149721] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149725] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149857] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.149861] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150052] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150056] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150061] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150065] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150070] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150074] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150078] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150083] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150088] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150092] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150096] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.150100] ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20221020/psobject-220)
[ 0.174699] ACPI: EC: EC_CMD/EC_SC=0x66, EC_DATA=0x62
[ 0.239696] ACPI: EC: EC_CMD/EC_SC=0x66, EC_DATA=0x62
[ 0.241528] libata version 3.00 loaded.
[ 0.265816] VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.6.0
[ 0.335160] integrity: Loaded X.509 cert 'Acer Database: 84f00f5841571abd2cc11a8c26d5c9c8d2b6b0b5'
[ 0.361633] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 30720k
[ 0.362297] Freeing unused kernel image (rodata/data gap) memory: 1672K
[ 0.374246] rodata_test: all tests were successful
[ 0.480156] pci 10000:e0:17.0: [8086:a0d3] type 00 class 0x010601
[ 0.480177] pci 10000:e0:17.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00001fff]
[ 0.480189] pci 10000:e0:17.0: reg 0x14: [mem 0x00000000-0x000000ff]
[ 0.480201] pci 10000:e0:17.0: reg 0x18: [io 0x0000-0x0007]
[ 0.480214] pci 10000:e0:17.0: reg 0x1c: [io 0x0000-0x0003]
[ 0.480229] pci 10000:e0:17.0: reg 0x20: [io 0x0000-0x001f]
[ 0.480245] pci 10000:e0:17.0: reg 0x24: [mem 0x50000000-0x500007ff]
[ 0.480291] pci 10000:e0:17.0: PME# supported from D3hot
[ 1.515111] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x50100000-0x50101fff]
[ 1.515128] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 5: assigned [mem 0x50102000-0x501027ff]
[ 1.515142] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 1: assigned [mem 0x50102800-0x501028ff]
[ 1.515149] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 4: no space for [io size 0x0020]
[ 1.515152] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 4: failed to assign [io size 0x0020]
[ 1.515154] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 2: no space for [io size 0x0008]
[ 1.515157] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 2: failed to assign [io size 0x0008]
[ 1.515159] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 3: no space for [io size 0x0004]
[ 1.515161] pci 10000:e0:17.0: BAR 3: failed to assign [io size 0x0004]
[ 1.515272] ahci 10000:e0:17.0: version 3.0
[ 1.515282] ahci 10000:e0:17.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT A
[ 1.515284] ahci 10000:e0:17.0: PCI INT A: no GSI
[ 1.515452] ahci 10000:e0:17.0: AHCI 0001.0301 32 slots 2 ports 6 Gbps 0x3 impl SATA mode
[ 1.515458] ahci 10000:e0:17.0: flags: 64bit ncq sntf pm clo only pio slum part deso sadm sds
[ 1.516306] scsi host0: ahci
[ 1.516851] scsi host1: ahci
[ 1.516931] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x50102000 port 0x50102100 irq 144
[ 1.516937] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x50102000 port 0x50102180 irq 144
[ 1.828798] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 4 SControl 300)
[ 1.828841] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 4 SControl 300)
[ 1.929820] EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p5): mounted filesystem ea0369bb-095e-49fd-b7ba-ee65e176e115 with ordered data mode. Quota mode: none.
[ 2.049148] systemd[1]: systemd 253-1-arch running in system mode (+PAM +AUDIT -SELINUX -APPARMOR -IMA +SMACK +SECCOMP +GCRYPT +GNUTLS +OPENSSL +ACL +BLKID +CURL +ELFUTILS +FIDO2 +IDN2 -IDN +IPTC +KMOD +LIBCRYPTSETUP +LIBFDISK +PCRE2 -PWQUALITY +P11KIT -QRENCODE +TPM2 +BZIP2 +LZ4 +XZ +ZLIB +ZSTD +BPF_FRAMEWORK +XKBCOMMON +UTMP -SYSVINIT default-hierarchy=unified)
[ 3.567415] cfg80211: Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates for regulatory database
[ 888.574142] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 4 SControl 300)
[ 888.577702] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 4 SControl 300)

The laptop is Acer A514, I don't have settings related SATA and AHCI in the BIOS even in extended mode. In Windows other partition from SATA drive is mounted and works well. But Samsung Magican application in Windows shows that AHCI for it is disabled (not sure why).

Seems will have to rollback to previous Linux kernel version but hope that this issue will be fixed.

d.ALT · 2023-03-01 07:58:15

What if you boot one-time (edit "on-the -fly" the cmdline from your BootLoader) with noapic acpi=off kernel parameters?
If that will let the kernel show up your sda, post here:

# journalctl -b | curl -F 'file=@-' 0x0.st

andertalez · 2023-03-01 09:45:22

d.ALT wrote:

What if you boot one-time (edit "on-the -fly" the cmdline from your BootLoader) with noapic acpi=off kernel parameters?
If that will let the kernel show up your sda, post here:
# journalctl -b | curl -F 'file=@-' 0x0.st

noapic and noacpi didn't help - the same result as before. With acpi=off it didn't even start booting.

seth · 2023-03-01 11:33:17

1. Please use code tags, https://bbs.archlinux.org/help.php#bbcode
2. Don't empty-post "#metoo"
3. loqs shared a bunch of bisecting kernels and I asked multiple times to test whether the ssd shows up after an S3 (and thins being a race condition)

emmixis · 2023-03-01 11:55:33

Experiencing the exact same problem on a HP Pavilion 14-dv0589na laptop. Had to roll kernel back, as /sysroot was failing to mount...

lspci output below:

0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 9a04 (rev 01)
0000:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP GT2 [UHD Graphics G4] (rev 01)
0000:00:04.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation TigerLake-LP Dynamic Tuning Processor Participant (rev 01)
0000:00:08.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation GNA Scoring Accelerator module (rev 01)
0000:00:0d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Thunderbolt 4 USB Controller (rev 01)
0000:00:0e.0 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation Volume Management Device NVMe RAID Controller
0000:00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP USB 3.2 Gen 2x1 xHCI Host Controller (rev 20)
0000:00:14.2 RAM memory: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Shared SRAM (rev 20)
0000:00:15.0 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Serial IO I2C Controller #0 (rev 20)
0000:00:15.1 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Serial IO I2C Controller #1 (rev 20)
0000:00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Management Engine Interface (rev 20)
0000:00:17.0 System peripheral: Intel Corporation RST VMD Managed Controller
0000:00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device a0be (rev 20)
0000:00:1c.7 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP PCI Express Root Port #8 (rev 20)
0000:00:1e.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Serial IO UART Controller #0 (rev 20)
0000:00:1e.3 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Serial IO SPI Controller #1 (rev 20)
0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP LPC Controller (rev 20)
0000:00:1f.3 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP Smart Sound Technology Audio Controller (rev 20)
0000:00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP SMBus Controller (rev 20)
0000:00:1f.5 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP SPI Controller (rev 20)
0000:01:00.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTS522A PCI Express Card Reader (rev 01)
0000:02:00.0 Network controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIe Wireless Network Adapter
10000:e0:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP SATA Controller (rev 20)

I note the same chipset and SATA controller in common, and both appear to fail at the end of early userspace, during the sysroot mount.

andertalez · 2023-03-01 12:18:03

seth wrote:

seth wrote:
Next to the bisecting kernels, try to suspend and wake the system and see whether the drive shows up.

I tried to go the system to Sleep and awake after that - SATA devices was not detected after resume.

andertalez · 2023-03-01 12:45:50

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke … 4759f6dc3e
Recently there was this change for Linux kernel, it might be a cause of the issue, because all customers had issues with Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP SATA Controller

loqs · 2023-03-01 13:41:51

andertalez wrote:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke … 4759f6dc3e
Recently there was this change for Linux kernel, it might be a cause of the issue, because all customers had issues with Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP SATA Controller

In https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 7#p2087297 chanow reported the issue was not present in 6.1.14 which contains 939640b997438ea2214d71f644f8d34759f6dc3e

Last edited by loqs (2023-03-01 14:20:06)

emmixis · 2023-03-01 13:49:28

loqs wrote:

andertalez wrote:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke … 4759f6dc3e
Recently there was this change for Linux kernel, it might be a cause of the issue, because all customers had issues with Intel Corporation Tiger Lake-LP SATA Controller
In https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 7#p2087297 chanow reported the issue was not present in 6.1.14 which contains 939640b997438ea2214d71f644f8d34759f6dc3e

Chanow claims in the referenced post that the problem exists on 6.1.13.1-lts. Kernel version 6.1.12 is mentioned as "the last version to work properly" on that post. I'm inclined to believe the change that broke Tiger Lake happened between 6.1.12 and 6.1.13.

loqs · 2023-03-01 14:05:35

What if the kernel parameter libata.force=nolpm is added?
Edit:
If that does not work what about reverting 104ff59af73aba524e57ae0fef70121643ff270e
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EITlud … share_link linux-6.2.1.arch1-9-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xx0Hd5 … share_link linux-headers-6.2.1.arch1-9-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst

Last edited by loqs (2023-03-01 14:30:00)

chanow · 2023-03-01 14:29:45

loqs wrote:

What if the kernel parameter libata.force=nolpm is added?

I just tried it on 6.1.13.1-lts and doesn't seem to change anything.

The results I have up to now point to changes between 6.1.12 and 6.1.13. I have not posted the output from dmesg and lspci, as they are quite similar to ones posted by andertalez and Blitz67.

loqs · 2023-03-01 14:31:18

chanow please try kernel from my edit to post 36 which reverts the commit andertalez found.

Last edited by loqs (2023-03-01 14:37:10)

chanow · 2023-03-01 14:42:05

loqs wrote:

chanow please try kernel from my edit to post 36 which reverts the commit emmixis found.

I really wish i could,but my linux skills are limited and don't go that far.

emmixis · 2023-03-01 14:47:24

chanow wrote:

loqs wrote:
chanow please try kernel from my edit to post 36 which reverts the commit emmixis found.
I really wish i could,but my linux skills are limited and don't go that far.

It's simple to manually install the package, same as if it were locally built:

 pacman -U <package file (.pkg.tar.zst)>

seth · 2023-03-01 15:04:26

Concerned patch looks like "ahci.mobile_lpm_policy=1" would be relevant?

andertalez · 2023-03-01 15:11:16

emmixis wrote:

chanow wrote:
loqs wrote:
chanow please try kernel from my edit to post 36 which reverts the commit emmixis found.
I really wish i could,but my linux skills are limited and don't go that far.
It's simple to manually install the package, same as if it were locally built:
 pacman -U <package file (.pkg.tar.zst)> 

It requires *.sig files to install, do you have them or how to generate?

seth · 2023-03-01 15:13:31

It requires *.sig files to install

No?

d.ALT · 2023-03-01 15:15:58

seth wrote:

It requires *.sig files to install
No?

Indeed.
Anyway, you'll find 'em next-to .pkg.tar.zst inside ArchLinux's Archive.

emmixis · 2023-03-01 15:16:19

andertalez wrote:

emmixis wrote:
chanow wrote:
I really wish i could,but my linux skills are limited and don't go that far.
It's simple to manually install the package, same as if it were locally built:
 pacman -U <package file (.pkg.tar.zst)> 
It requires *.sig files to install, do you have them or how to generate?

If I recall correctly you can disable local file sig checks with this option in the pacman config:

LocalFileSigLevel = Optional

I may recall incorrectly though

andertalez · 2023-03-01 15:21:27

loqs wrote:

What if the kernel parameter libata.force=nolpm is added?
Edit:
If that does not work what about reverting 104ff59af73aba524e57ae0fef70121643ff270e
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EITlud … share_link linux-6.2.1.arch1-9-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xx0Hd5 … share_link linux-headers-6.2.1.arch1-9-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst

Downloaded this version of 6.2.1, seems without recent commit related Tiger Lake SATA controller, installed and it works !!!
System is booting well, secondary SATA disk is found and mounted.
Thank you!

BTW, sorry, it doesn't require SIG files, I tried to install by using file:// prefix before (from Arch manual), but actually it must be without it.

Last edited by andertalez (2023-03-01 15:23:14)

seth · 2023-03-01 15:33:39

In case anyone still has an unpatched kernel around, please try passing "ahci.mobile_lpm_policy=1" to the https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel_parameters

chanow · 2023-03-01 15:34:42

andertalez wrote:

loqs wrote:
What if the kernel parameter libata.force=nolpm is added?
Edit:
If that does not work what about reverting 104ff59af73aba524e57ae0fef70121643ff270e
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EITlud … share_link linux-6.2.1.arch1-9-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xx0Hd5 … share_link linux-headers-6.2.1.arch1-9-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst
Downloaded this version of 6.2.1, seems without recent commit related Tiger Lake SATA controller, installed and it works !!!
System is booting well, secondary SATA disk is found and mounted.
Thank you!
BTW, sorry, it doesn't require SIG files, I tried to install by using file:// prefix before (from Arch manual), but actually it must be without it.

I'll second that, it worked!

This forum seems to have nailed it, especially loqs and andertalez. Hope the results of this thread will reflect on next versions of the kernel.

chanow · 2023-03-01 15:45:07

emmixis wrote:

chanow wrote:
loqs wrote:
chanow please try kernel from my edit to post 36 which reverts the commit emmixis found.
I really wish i could,but my linux skills are limited and don't go that far.
It's simple to manually install the package, same as if it were locally built:
 pacman -U <package file (.pkg.tar.zst)> 

Thanks emmixis, on hindsight I thought it would be a lot more complicated.

As mentioned by others, I just edited /etc/pacman.conf to change SigLevel to reflect the absence of the signature file.

Anyway I will be returning to 6.1.12.arch1-1 until the next 6.2 kernel gets this dealt with.

seth · 2023-03-01 15:50:13

Hope the results of this thread will reflect on next versions of the kernel.

Don't hold your breath - the patch only hooks TL into an existing feature.

seth wrote:

In case anyone still has an unpatched kernel around, please try passing "ahci.mobile_lpm_policy=1" to the https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel_parameters

I just edited /etc/pacman.conf to change SigLevel

Undo that.
"pacman -U" doesn't require any kind of signature files.

Arch Linux

#26 2023-03-01 07:11:24

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#27 2023-03-01 07:53:52

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#28 2023-03-01 07:58:15

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#29 2023-03-01 09:45:22

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#30 2023-03-01 11:33:17

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#31 2023-03-01 11:55:33

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#32 2023-03-01 12:18:03

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#33 2023-03-01 12:45:50

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#34 2023-03-01 13:41:51

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#35 2023-03-01 13:49:28

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#36 2023-03-01 14:05:35

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#37 2023-03-01 14:29:45

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#38 2023-03-01 14:31:18

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#39 2023-03-01 14:42:05

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#40 2023-03-01 14:47:24

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#41 2023-03-01 15:04:26

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#42 2023-03-01 15:11:16

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#43 2023-03-01 15:13:31

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#44 2023-03-01 15:15:58

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#45 2023-03-01 15:16:19

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#46 2023-03-01 15:21:27

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#47 2023-03-01 15:33:39

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#48 2023-03-01 15:34:42

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#49 2023-03-01 15:45:07

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

#50 2023-03-01 15:50:13

Re: [SOLVED] SSD drive disappeared after upgrade to linux-6.2.1.arch1-1

Board footer