You are not logged in.
SOLVED: It was a hardware issue
lspci -k
03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 (rev 78)
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi
Kernel modules: iwlwifi
iwconfig
wlp3s0 IEEE 802.11 ESSID:"Neidel's Netz"
Mode:Managed Frequency:5.26 GHz Access Point: 44:4E:6D:A4:46:1D
Bit Rate=390 Mb/s Tx-Power=20 dBm
Retry short limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off
Power Management:on
Link Quality=27/70 Signal level=-83 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:135 Invalid misc:226 Missed beacon:0
dmesg | grep -e wlp3s0 -e wifi
Using Network-Manager and latest Kernel (6.2.1).
Signal is never better than -80. Connection only works in the same room as the router and even there it has a hard time establishing and maintaining the connection.
My Fritzbox is reporting 65 Mbit/s, where other 5 GHz devices are doing >600 Mbit/s.
Last edited by jneidel (2023-03-05 09:49:24)
Offline
Connection only works in the same room as the router and even there it has a hard time establishing and maintaining the connection.
No wonder with
Signal is never better than -80.
That's terrible and -83dBm is borderline dead.
Do you get a better signal on 2.4GHz?
What kind of hardware is this? Notebook?
If yes: did you at some point open the case?
If not: did you forget to attach the antennas to the board?
Online
That has the smell of an antenna selection problem. Some of what I am going to ask for below will be redundant with what you have already posed.
What are the output of:
iw wlp3s0 station dump
iw phy
Edit: Although I am finding iwlwifi has no antenna select paramaters. You might try the suggestions offered here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Networ … ss#iwlwifi
Last edited by ewaller (2023-03-04 16:23:51)
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine. -- Alan Turing
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
Do you get a better signal on 2.4GHz?
I don't know how to test that.
What kind of hardware is this?
A refurbished Thinkpad X270 from ebay, which I did not open.
did you forget to attach the antennas to the board?
I assume laptops wouldn't have/need an antenna.
$ iw wlp3s0 station dump
Station 44:4e:6d:a4:46:1d (on wlp3s0)
inactive time: 2957 ms
rx bytes: 13170671
rx packets: 11620
tx bytes: 916625
tx packets: 6954
tx retries: 6390
tx failed: 57
beacon loss: 0
beacon rx: 3587
rx drop misc: 71
signal: -88 [-88, -91] dBm
signal avg: -86 [-86, -90] dBm
beacon signal avg: -87 dBm
tx bitrate: 390.0 MBit/s VHT-MCS 4 80MHz short GI VHT-NSS 2
tx duration: 0 us
rx bitrate: 65.0 MBit/s VHT-MCS 1 80MHz short GI VHT-NSS 1
rx duration: 0 us
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
associated: yes
preamble: long
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
DTIM period: 1
beacon interval:100
short slot time:yes
connected time: 371 seconds
associated at [boottime]: 19.097s
associated at: 1678005540993 ms
current time: 1678005912121 ms
You might try the suggestions offered here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Networ … ss#iwlwifi
Did not affect the signal strength.
What making this worse is that my girlfriend has the same machine (same wifi card) running the same Arch setup without problems.
Offline
I don't know how to test that.
Connect to some 2.4GHz AP, check the signal.
I assume laptops wouldn't have/need an antenna.
No, that's exclusive the ATX (and similar) boards.
Did not affect the signal strength.
The only parameter there that might actually impact the signal is the bt coexistence - but not on 5GHz (BT is 2.4 GHz)
A refurbished Thinkpad X270 from ebay, which I did not open.
Hardware issue w/ 99% confidence.
They removed or misplaced or miswired the antenna or shielded it otherwise or perhaps it broke (crosses the hinge)
https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/soluti … nkpad-x270
Ideally the antenna(s) are just not properly attached to the wifi-card, funmbling w/ the lid is probably nasty
Online
Hardware issue w/ 99% confidence.
Yeah, that's what I thought. They also stripped some screws so I'll have a hard time doing this myself.
Thanks for the sanity check!
Offline
To raise that to 100% you could boot some life distro w/ a different kernel/software stack and check the signal quality there - but I'd not be too hopeful
Online